Dwarkesh Podcast
Dwarkesh Patel
Why Leonardo was a saboteur, Gutenberg went broke, and Florence was weird – Ada Palmer
Historian and novelist Ada Palmer joins the podcast to peel back the layers of the Renaissance, revealing a period far more complex and unexpected than popular history suggests. Through a lens of long-term social evolution, Palmer challenges common assumptions about historical progress and the unintended consequences of human ambition. Listeners will explore why Gutenberg’s printing press only thrived once it reached Venice and how the rise of ephemeral pamphlets accelerated religious and political upheaval. The conversation also examines the irony of the Inquisition and the paradox of Petrarch’s influence, tracing how his attempt to revive Roman virtue inadvertently contributed to the devastating wars of the era, while simultaneously laying the intellectual groundwork for the scientific revolution. This episode offers a fascinating look at how historical shifts are driven by complex technological and social forces rather than the simple intentions of key figures.
Updated Apr 10, 2026
About This Episode
Renaissance history is so much wilder and weirder than you would have expected. Very fun chatting with Ada Palmer (historian, novelist, and composer based at the University of Chicago).
Some especially fascinating things I learned from the conversation and her excellent book, Inventing the Renaissance:
Not only did Gutenberg go bankrupt in the 1450s (after inventing the printing press), but so did the bank that foreclosed on him, and so did his apprentices. This is because paper was still very expensive, and so you had to make this big upfront CAPEX decision to print a batch of 300 copies of a book - say the Bible. But he’s in a small landlocked German town where only priests are allowed to read the Bible - so he sells maybe 7 copies. It’s only when this technology ends up in Venice, where you can hand 10 copies to each of 30 ship captains going to 30 different cities, that it starts taking off.
Speaking of which, the printing revolution wasn’t just one single discrete event, just as the computer revolution has been this whole century of going from mainframes -> personal computers -> phones -> social media, each with different and accelerating social impact. Books came first, but they’re slow to print, and made in small batches. The real revolution is pamphlets - much faster, much harder to censor. Pamphlet runners are how you can have Luther’s 95 Theses go from Wittenberg to London in 17 days.
So much other wild stuff from this episode. For example, did you know that the largest and best-funded experimental laboratory in 17th century Europe was very likely the Roman one run by inquisitors? Ada jokes that the Inquisition accidentally invented peer review. The focus of the Inquisition is really misunderstood - it was obsessed with catching dangerous new heretics like Lutherans and Calvinists - it only executed one person for doing science.
And this leads Ada to make an observation that I think is really wise: the authorities and censors are always worried about the exact wrong things given 20/20 hindsight. When Inquisition raids an underground bookshop during the French Enlightenment, they don’t mind the Rousseau, Voltaire, and Encyclopédie, but they lose their minds about some Jansenist treatises about the technical nature of the Trinity.
More broadly, a lesson for me from this episode is that it’s just really hard to shape history in the specific way that you want to impact things. One of the most famous medieval scholars is this guy Petrarch. He survives the Black Death in the 1340s, watches his friends die to plague and bandits, and says: our leaders are selfish and terrible, we need to raise them on the Roman classics so they’ll act like Cicero. So Europe pours money into finding ancient manuscripts, building libraries, and educating princes on classical virtues. Those princes grow up and fight bigger, nastier wars than ever before with new deadlier technology. And this, combined with greater urbanization and endemic plague, results in European life expectancy decreasing from 35 in the medieval period to 18 during the Renaissance (the period which we in retrospect think of as a golden age but which many people living through it thought of as the continuation of the dark ages that had persisted since the fall of Rome).
Anyways, the libraries Petrarch inspires stick around, the printing press makes them accessible to everyone, and 200 years later a generation of medical students is reading Lucretius and asking “what if there are atoms and that’s how diseases work?” which eventually leads to germ theory, vaccines, and a cure for the Black Death (Ada has longer more involved explanation of how cosplaying the Romans results through a series of many steps to the scientific revolution). Petrarch wanted to produce philosopher-kings that shared his values. Instead he created a world that doesn’t share his values at all but can cure the disease that destroyed his.
Watch on YouTube; read the transcript.
Sponsors
* Jane Street is still waiting on someone to solve their backdoor puzzle… They’re accepting submissions until April 1st and have set aside $50,000 for the best attempts. Separately, applications are live for Jane Street’s summer ML internships in NY, London, and Hong Kong. Go check all of this out at janestreet.com/dwarkesh.
* Labelbox can help ensure your agents don’t need to rely on overspecified prompts. They tailor real-world scenarios to whatever domain you’re focused on, and they make sure the data you train on rewards real understanding, not just instruction-following. Learn more at labelbox.com/dwarkesh
* Mercury’s personal accounts let you add users, issue cards, and customize permissions. This is super useful for sharing finances with a partner, a roommate… or even an OpenClaw agent. And, if you’re already a Mercury Business user, your personal account is free! See terms and conditions below, and learn more at mercury.com/personal-banking
Eligible Mercury Business users who apply for and maintain a Mercury Personal account may have their Mercury Personal subscription fee waived provided they remain a user on an active Mercury Business account in good standing. Standard Mercury Platform Subscription fees will apply if they no longer meet eligibility requirements, including but not limited to no longer being associated with an eligible Mercury Business account, or if the program is modified or terminated. Mercury may modify or discontinue this offering at any time and will provide notice as required by law. See Subscription Terms for full details.
* To sponsor a future episode, visit dwarkesh.com/advertise.
Timestamps
(00:00:00) - How cosplaying Ancient Rome led to the Renaissance
(00:28:49) - How Florence’s weird republic worked
(00:38:13) - How the Medicis took over Florence
(00:58:12) - Why it was so hard for Gutenberg to make any money off the printing press
(01:17:34) - Why the industrial revolution didn’t happen in Italy
(01:23:02) - The Library of Alexandria isn’t where most ancient books were lost
(01:41:21) - The Inquisition accidentally invented peer review
Get full access to Dwarkesh Podcast at www.dwarkesh.com/subscribe
Listen to Dwarkesh Podcast in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
More Episodes
Grant Sanderson – AI and the future of math
In this episode, Grant Sanderson, the creator of the popular mathematics channel 3Blue1Brown, joins the podcast to explore the rapidly evolving intersection of artificial intelligence and mathematics. Sanderson argues that mathematics serves as an ideal "spiky" frontier to monitor AI progress because it requires both brute-force calculation and genuine creative insight. The discussion tackles whether achieving high-level results, such as winning a gold medal at the International Math Olympiad, equates to AGI. Sanderson notes that while AI models have become remarkably proficient at certain mathematical categories through exhaustive training, they still struggle with the creative, puzzle-like nature of problems in fields like combinatorics. He and the host contemplate the difficulty of creating benchmarks for "great" mathematics, noting that the most profound advancements, like Galois theory, often lack immediate utility and take decades—or even centuries—of human verification to be fully understood. The conversation highlights the challenge of training AI to move beyond solving existing problems toward the higher-level goals of generating new, elegant conjectures and definitions that provide fundamental, human-understandable insights into the nature of reality.
The next big breakthrough will be AIs learning on the job
In this episode, the discussion centers on a pivotal shift in artificial intelligence research: moving from static training to models that learn on the job. The host explores the industry’s current bet on Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), where training agents across millions of simulated tasks is expected to produce highly capable, general-purpose AIs. While this approach has seen success, the host highlights a significant bottleneck: the inability of current models to engage in true continual learning, where experiences gained during deployment are permanently distilled into the model’s weights. A central theme is the challenge of sample efficiency and the "canyon" between verifiable, grindable tasks like coding and unpredictable, real-world scenarios. To bridge this, the episode examines emerging techniques like On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) and the concept of "dreaming," where models generate their own simulations to rehearse skills. The host envisions a future where AI progress is driven not just by initial training, but by cumulative learning from diverse, real-world interactions. Ultimately, the episode argues that the next major breakthrough lies in enabling AIs to consolidate tacit knowledge from their daily deployments, transforming every interaction into an opportunity for growth.
The data black hole at the center of AI
In this episode, the host explores the fundamental discrepancy between human learning and current artificial intelligence development, focusing on the concept of sample efficiency. While humans can master complex tasks with relatively minimal exposure, modern AI models require astronomical amounts of data, often training on trillions of tokens—a million-fold increase compared to human experience. The discussion frames current AI not as a system that learns like a human, but rather as a massive, labor-intensive assembly of expert-curated data and reinforcement learning rollouts. The episode challenges the idea that simply scaling model parameters will eventually bridge this gap in efficiency. Instead, the host argues that humans appear to operate on an entirely different learning curve, suggesting that current architectural approaches are inherently limited by their data-hungry nature. Despite this, the host explains why the current industry strategy remains viable: AI’s ability to "fire-hose" gigawatts of compute into training allows it to automate white-collar tasks by brute force, even if the process is vastly more inefficient than human learning. The conversation concludes by questioning whether these models can eventually solve their own limitations, potentially accelerating the path toward more generalized, efficient intelligence.
Ada Palmer – Machiavelli is the most misunderstood thinker of all time
In this episode of the Dwarkesh Podcast, historian and author Ada Palmer offers a compelling re-examination of Niccolò Machiavelli, arguing that he remains one of history’s most misunderstood thinkers. The discussion moves beyond the common caricatures of Machiavellianism to explore the volatile, high-stakes political environment of Renaissance Italy that shaped his work. Palmer provides crucial historical context, explaining how the collapse of stable city-state traditions and the unpredictable, non-hereditary nature of the Papacy created a "perfect storm" of instability. She highlights how Machiavelli’s firsthand experience as a diplomat—most notably his proximity to the charismatic and terrifying Cesare Borgia—deeply informed his theories on power. The conversation illustrates that Machiavelli was not merely advocating for ruthlessness; he was a strategic realist obsessively concerned with the stability of a state. He analyzed the nuances of leadership, distinguishing between actions that secure long-term order and those that invite ruin. Ultimately, the episode portrays Machiavelli as an astute observer of human nature and political utility, suggesting that his work provides a sophisticated manual for navigating a world defined as much by random fortune as by human agency.
Alex Imas and Phil Trammell – What remains scarce after AGI?
In this episode, Alex Imas and Phil Trammell join the host to explore the economic implications of advanced AI and widespread automation. The discussion centers on the core question of what will remain scarce in an era where AI can perform an increasing range of human tasks. The guests analyze the potential shift toward a "relational sector," where the human component of a service—such as in healthcare or performance—retains intrinsic value for consumers, even when automated alternatives are available. The conversation delves into the concept of labor share and whether the traditional division of income between wages and capital will collapse as AI improves. Through an analysis of historical precedents, such as the Industrial Revolution, the participants highlight the difficulty of forecasting labor market trends and emphasize the need for better data on consumer demand elasticities. They also examine the risks of a "messy middle" transition, where piecemeal automation could create political instability without generating sufficient immediate wealth to fund broad-based redistribution. Finally, they debate the merits of various policy responses, including universal basic income and universal basic capital, weighing their respective political and economic trade-offs in an increasingly automated future.
Michael Nielsen – How science actually progresses
In this episode of the Dwarkesh Podcast, host Dwarkesh Patel sits down with researcher Michael Nielsen to explore the often mysterious and non-linear nature of scientific progress. While scientific advancement is often viewed as a steady march toward truth, Nielsen highlights the reality of remarkably long and hostile verification loops, such as the two millennia that passed between Aristarchus’s heliocentric hypothesis and the first successful measurement of stellar parallax. By examining historical figures like Einstein, Darwin, and Prout, the two discuss how science manages to progress even when experimental evidence is ambiguous. The conversation also delves into provocative ideas, including the theory that alien civilizations would likely possess a vastly different technological stack than our own. Listeners can expect a deep dive into the philosophy of discovery, the evolution of scientific principles, and what it truly takes to internalize complex knowledge.
Terence Tao – Kepler, Newton, and the true nature of mathematical discovery
In this episode of the Dwarkesh Podcast, host Dwarkesh Patel sits down with renowned mathematician Terence Tao to explore the intricacies of scientific discovery and the evolving role of artificial intelligence in research. The conversation begins by examining the historical brilliance of Johannes Kepler, using his journey toward uncovering the laws of planetary motion to challenge common assumptions about how scientific progress occurs. They discuss the concept of epistemic difficulty, noting that breakthrough theories often face decades of skepticism before they are widely accepted. The dialogue then shifts toward modern technology, as the pair investigates whether AI can truly foster deep understanding or if it primarily serves as a tool for surface-level optimization. Listeners can expect a thought-provoking analysis of human intuition, the future of collaboration between humans and machines in mathematics, and the nature of original insight.
Dylan Patel — Deep dive on the 3 big bottlenecks to scaling AI compute
In this episode of the Dwarkesh Podcast, host Dwarkesh Patel sits down with SemiAnalysis founder Dylan Patel for a comprehensive examination of the hardware ecosystem driving the artificial intelligence revolution. The discussion centers on the three critical bottlenecks to scaling AI compute: logic, memory, and power. Dylan provides an insider look at the economics governing the entire stack, detailing the strategic roles of AI labs, hyperscalers, foundries, and semiconductor equipment manufacturers. Listeners will gain a deep understanding of how companies like Nvidia and TSMC navigate production constraints, the impending memory crisis, and why equipment manufacturers like ASML may become the ultimate gatekeepers of progress by 2030. From the geopolitical implications of semiconductor manufacturing to the practical realities of infrastructure scaling, this episode offers a detailed roadmap of the hardware challenges that will define the future of the industry.
The most important question nobody's asking about AI
In this episode of the Dwarkesh Podcast, host Dwarkesh Patel explores the complex intersection of artificial intelligence, government oversight, and civil liberty. The conversation centers on the provocative question of how AI capabilities might fundamentally reshape the relationship between the state and the individual. Patel examines the risks posed by AI in the context of national security, specifically focusing on the tension between Anthropic’s safety goals and the strategic interests of institutions like the Pentagon. The discussion delves into the potential for AI to facilitate unprecedented levels of mass surveillance and the murky reality of alignment: whose values are these systems actually being trained to uphold? Listeners can expect a deep, analytical dive into whether the perceived benefits of state-led AI coordination are worth the long-term costs to personal privacy and the structural risks of authoritarian-leaning technology.
Dario Amodei — "We are near the end of the exponential"
In this episode of the Dwarkesh Podcast, host Dwarkesh Patel sits down with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to explore the near-term future of artificial intelligence. Amodei argues that humanity is approaching the threshold of AGI, envisioning a future where powerful data centers essentially house a country of geniuses. The conversation provides a deep dive into the scaling hypothesis, examining how task-specific reinforcement learning can drive generalization and reshape the broader economy. Listeners can expect a candid look at the technical and strategic roadmap for AI development, including the logistics of massive compute commitments and the long-term path toward profitability for frontier labs. They also debate the implications of international competition and the potential impact of future regulations on the development of these transformative technologies. It is an essential discussion for those tracking the rapid evolution of modern AI.
Related Podcasts
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.