Toy Story Five and Digital Childhood

The economist Hello and welcome to the Intelligence fromrom the Economist. I'm Rosie Blor Today on the show, Colombia's new right wing president and Toy Story F tackles tech The first I have spoken to hisis Majesty, the King this morning to inform him of my decision This morning, Britain's Prime Minister Sakir Stahmer said his time was up I will resign. as leader of the Labour Party. Two years after Labor won a resounding victory at the general election, Starmer has lost the support of the country and his party question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election. I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party too that question And I accept that answer with good grace Even as he continued to trumpet Labor's successes, Starmer gave an emotional farewell I shall spend more time on the most important job. being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife Vick, who has been a rock by my side through good times and bad Meanwhile, Andy Burnham, who won a crucial by election on Friday, and who is largely assumed to be Stalmer's successor, is heading to Westminster to be sworn in as an MP. Whether Britain now has a leadership contest or a coronation is not yet clear What is certain is that the country will soon have its seventh prime minister in ten years When we spoke on Friday, Kir Starmer was pledging to carry on as Prime Minister and to fight against any challenge from Andy Burnnham or from anyone else for the Labour leadership Hugo Ji is our Britain political correspondent. He has admitted this morning he's not going to be able to do that He said, esssentially The Labour Party had decided that they needed a new leader to take them into the next election to see off the threat from the right wing populace of reform UK and that he was not going to be able to do that. so That's why this morning he has announced that he's leaving and set out timetable for his departure So what happens next? What is that timetable What happens next? it's in the hands of the committee that runs the Labour Party, nominations to succeed Starmer as labour leader and therefore as prrime Minister, will open in a couple of weeks time and then if there is more than one candidate, a leadership election will run over July and August with a new leader in place by September Where did it all go wrong for Stara Well it went wrong for Starmer almost from the very start. He came to office without much of a strong political strategy and immediately started making mistakes. He scrapped a winter fuel benefit for older people that was hugely popular. He kept taking free gifts and free hospitality. The public really didn't understand why that was happening. He made the controversial new labour veteran Peter Mandelson Brit's ambassador to Washington, despite Mandelson's long and well documented links to Jeffrey Epstein. That's not to say that Stalmer hasn't had successes. He's dealt with Donald Trump. Surprisingly well brought in Sam economic reforms that have g to make a difference. He's actually delivered on some of the ambitions of the leftft in ways that they like, for example workers' rights, strengthening those through some big legislation Overall, he's never managed to shake this impression that he's always been behind the curve and despite those successes, never sort of been on top of things in the way that a leader really has to be. Why the big shift? On Friday, he wasn't just saying he was going to stay, he was saying he'd stand in any leadership contest Yeah, that's right. The scale of Andy Burnham's victory last week in the Makerfield by election, I think has really made up the minds of a lot of labour MPs that Burnham can make a big difference in Labour's political fortunes and made the question of What happens with the leadership? a lot easier to answer mostost labour MPs think essentially there should be a straight handover from Starmer to Burnham. And what happened over the weekend was that even the senior labour politicians who were very close to Kir Starmer who have been hugely supportive of him in the past started to withdraw their support and tell him privately that he had to start setting out a timetable for a transition. It became clear that any leadership election be not just a defeat for Stala, but a genuine humiliation And will Berham be able to unite the Labour Party, do you think? Are people in Westminster united behind him now So The first question is is Burnham going to become leader unopposed I think he will be able to unite the Labour Party in the short term because like any political party, Labour's priority is winning and Berhner has shown that he is a winner The question is What happens in six months a year? if Burnham goes the way of Kir Stama and the way of ' pretty much every leader in the Western world and becomes rapidly more unpopular once they're in power. Will Labor still continue to row in behind him if that happens? I'm not so sure As you say, we don't yet know if it will be a coronation for Burnham or a contest. But if Burnham does win, what do we know about his plans? What does he stand for What we know is that he has left wing vibes Wout it being clear that he actually has a policy platform that would differ very much from Starmer's at all. He said he thinks it's important that Labour keeps to the manifesto it was elected on in twenty twenty four, a manifesto that obviously was drawn up by Kia Starmer. and that manifesto has some limits on what a new prrime Mister can do. For example, that manifesto says that labour won't raise any of the four biggest taxes that the government levies on the public It also says that a labor government will strictly balance the books Well If you're not going to borrow more and you're not going to tax more There's not going to be much more money for public spending in the short run. So Andy Burnham gives off this impression of being more of a sort of socialist than Kir Stahmer, more of a progressive champion. But it's not actually very clear there's much he can do at all that's all that different. As I say, it's mainly a matter of Probably vibes rather than substantial policy shift. And Hugo, Britain will soon have its seventh prime minister in ten years. What does that mean for British politics more broadly? Is Britain just ungovernable now So this is a question that the economist looked at a few weeks ago and we came to the conclusion that no, Britain is not unovernable. It's just badly governed. There are some structural issues, particularly in the wake of Brexit and we have a governing class that has lost the ability to compromise, but a sufficiently strong leader. really could change that if Andy Burnham can use his popularity and use his status as a new broom to impress on labour and impress on the political class as a whole Britain can only be governed with some hard choices, some hard compromises, for example, genuine planning reform that would have losers as well as winners, or an energy policy that actually accepts that a full throated one hundred percent drive towards eliminating carbon emissions at the expense of all else is not the right one and that we compromise that brings down the cost of energy big issues like that, but hard decisions, then Britain could be very well governed It's just we've had a succession of leaders who partly through their own fault, partly because of external factors, haven't been able to make those breakthroughs. It's not to say those breakthroughs are impossible to make Hg go. Thank you so much for talking to me Thank you G at him now Look on on pianos This is the new president of Colombia, Allaro de la Esprea, speaking to crowds in a yellow football shirt behind bulletproof glass. He's saying that the Colombian people have entrusted him with the supreme honor of being president Donald Trump endorsed his candidacy and has already congratulated him on his victory. According to the initial count, the right winger won yesterday's runoff by less than a percentage point, the tightest results on the highest turnout since nineteen fifty eight It looks to be definitive. The preliminary count is followed almost immediately by the official count where there's a judge or a notary observing the count and that's almost finished as we speak right now as well. And it actually gives Delesbrea a slightly higher lead, almost a full percentage point lead Hal Hodson is our America's editor There will no doubt be challenges from the left, in particular from the incumbent President Gustavo Petro. But in terms of the count, it is looking pretty secure Not everyone follows the details of Colombian politics every day. so remind us what the key issues are, what are the fault lines in Colombia Well, far and away the biggest issue for voters was security. Colombia is a country with a long history of violence and political violence And the problem is that ever since the deal that the government made with the FARC, which is the main rebel group that was fighting the Colombian government for years. A deal they made in twenty sixteen. At firstirst, that deal was going pretty well and violence was declining. But over the last four years, Mr Petro has been in power and he's been taking a different tact to dealing with gangs and rebel groups. He has been trying to negotiate with all of them at once using a policy called Paz tootal tootal peeace. And basically this hasn't been working. and Colombians have turned out en masse to vote against that So who is this new president? and where does he stand on these issues Dullapray is a Save social media savvy former criminal defense lawyer He's very rich, he has houses all over the world. He's a U.S. citizen and an Italian one as well as Colombian And he is in the mold of the El Salvadorian president Bukele. What this means is that he espouses an approach to security known as Manaduro And what that means is that he basically wants to take the fight to the gangs and the armed groups. He is not interested in negotiating, at least not in the first instance. He wants to use the army and all resources at his disposal to go after gangs, lock up gangsters and clean up the country. And in a place where security has been getting worse and worse under softer policies sounds very good to a large number of people Where does he stand on the economy Economically, his line is a little bit murkier. He says that he's going to save lots of money by cutting bureaucracy and closing embassies, but the amount of money that he could save by doing that is really trivial. He also says that he's going to save a vast sum by eliminating corruption. But again, there isn't that much money to be saved by doing that. The problem for Delesprea, as the problem for really any Colombian leader is that almost ninety percent of government spending is protected by law. And so if you want to cut that spending, you need to pass laws and maybe even change the Constitution And to pass laws and definitely to change the Constitution, you need strong majorities in Congress. And right now, Del Espreya's party has eight of, I think one hundred eight seats in the Senate in the upper House, which is just an indication of how weak they are there. And what about these grand claims on crime? Are they credible I think it's totally credible that Delespre could open a bunch of new prisons and take a very aggressive approach towards gangs. The question is whether it will work And I think it's quite likely that it will improve things for Colombians. There is not much doubt that a very soft approach where you just try and talk to armed groups that really have no incentive to tell you the truth or to cooperate, just talking to them, just negotiating with them all at the same time All it does is give them space. And we've seen that in Colombia over the past four years, the amount of territory that they control has increased, the amount of cocaine they produce has increased, the amount of extortions and robberies and gang related violence has all increased. And so There is no question in my mind that more aggression is warranted. The open question is what comes after that Do you try and just throw these bad guys in jail and that's the end of it? Maybe you have some mass trials, which is what has been done in El Salvador, but deeply questioned by human rights lawyers The problem is if you just do the authoritarian aggressive crackdown and you don't Keep up rule of law, then you end up in a very authoritarian place where people's rights kind of rely on whether or not the president likes them. And that's what's kind of happened in El Salvador And that is the risk. I won't say it's looking like a very huge risk. There's no reason to think that Abuilardo won't follow due process and won't combine aggression with rule of law. But that is the risk Kal, you've mentioned a number of other presidents in Latin America. Why have we seen this rise of right wing populists across the continent Well, security is a huge reason. It's the first time in twenty years now that right wing governments have been in control of what's known as the cocaine Belt, the group of countries Bolivia, Peru, Colombia and EcuadorI if you wanted to count that, where Almost all of the cocaine in the world is produced. Those countries have not been politically aligned for twenty years And so this is a huge opportunity for Donald Trump's anti gang agenda. He now has cooperative friendly governments in all of the places that matter. I think really it's that Softer approaches to crime have not been working. How that's sounding like it might actually be a good thing for Colombia that we've got this guy in charge now Yeah, much as We the economists don't necessarily like his political style. He's brash, he's loud. He talks about women in ways that I don't like. I Do you think that Aolardo is quite likely to be a good thing relative to the alternative Ivanceapeda for Colombia. And that's just because the current approach has so clearly failed. and Even his alignment with Donald Trump, I think, might be a good thing because Donald Trump is the most powerful man in the world if you need to stop gangs from destroying countries, you kind of need the help of the most powerful man in the world. And now Colombia, probably the most important country in that question of dealing with drug gangs, is aligned with Trump. and whether or not we like all of their politics, I think that that's probably net helpful for Colombia and net helpful for the region Cal, thank you very much. Thanks, Rdie You saved the day again, Woody? You're my favorite deputy. God friend in me It's no exaggeration to say that the premiere of Toy Story in nineteen ninety five was a watershed moment in the history of animation. Alexandra Sewich Bass is the economist culture editor. The film was the first full length feature made with computer generated imagery. It was groundbreaking and timely Now, nearly three decades on, the fifth installment in the franchise may be the best yet Though it only just hit American and British cinemas on Friday, some predict it could become the highest grossing film of the year worldwide. Unlike many mindless blockbusters currently on offer, this film is soulful and splendid. It deals with urgent themes such as how technology has hijacked childhood. Bonnie, screen time's over now. Hoping to help their shy daughter, Bonnie make friends. Her parents buy her a tablet. Discarded toys are only the most vocal victims The B biggest loser is Bonnie, who misses out on the thrill of imaginative play and feels even greater social alienation online. Previous Toy Story flicks have also reflected their eras, crazes and concerns The second film from nineteen ninety nine, for example, came out during the dot com boom. In it, Woody, up polstering cowboy has become a collectible Original hand painted face, Natural dye blanket stitched vest Little rip, fixable. Oh if only you had your hair. Toy Story five reprises and updates the first film's premise Displacement by something new and snazzy In the original, it was Buzz Lightyar To infinity Unneexpectedly, the film's biggest villain is not Lily Pad, but Bonnie's unwitting parents Passive and mindlessly gentle, they are tech addicted themselves, fail to enforce the screen time rules they set out for their child. and are too distracted to notice her descent into greater unhappiness Young audiences will walk out of this film perceiving old fashioned toys and screens a little bit differently. Meanwhile, parents will leave wondering whether they are really as blind as the film makes them out to be I'm losing Bonnie to this device. You got a phone If you are sick of franchises and interpret a number after a film's title as a warning sign, do not be put off ion on this bl A child happing he still needs us. That's all for this episode of The Intelligence. We'll see you back here tomorrow