AI in Filmmaking and Creativity

It's time for intelligent machines. Paris Martineau has the week off. Jeff Jarvis is here though, and Mike Elgin joins us as we talk to Robert Tursek. He's talking about the role of AI in motion pictures. He's been advising motion picture companies. He says Hollywood has to get with the program that's coming up next on intelligent machines podcasts you love from people you trust this is Twit . This is Intelligent Machines with Jeff Jarvis and Paris Martinau, episode 873, recorded Wednesday, June 3rd, 2026. Superman's M usta che. It's time for Intelligent Machines, the show we talk about the latest in AI, robotics, and all the smart things surrounding us these days. Mr. Professor Emeritus Jeff Jarvis , the Emeritus Professor of Journalistic Innovation at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City, University of New York , is here, author of Hot Type, which he was you were in a hot, sweaty studio recording earlier this week and I'm I'm two thirds of the way through. Oh, you're not even done. No hundred pages a day is not a bad pace, is it? How many pages are there? Three hundred. Maybe write fewer pages next time. Oh and I and I and I do lapse into uh Mark Twain uh tonight. When he said I'm um uh we were texting earlier this week, he said I'm in the studio, I said well I hope you do Hal Holbrook when you do the Mark Twain quotes . So you talk like this a little bit. I was on earlier with Jason Howell and he uh and I read a bit of it for him and he had no idea what I was doing. Well, because he's a younger fella. He's younger.. Yeah We're the gray hairs in the uh in the show. Let me see here. Hold on a second. Here, hold on a second. Here we're your Hal Holbrook. Your best Hal Holbrook. It was a wretchedly printed little sheet being very vague and pale in spots, and in other spots so caked with ink as to be hardly decipherable. The first column was occupied by original poetry of the sappiest description. The remaining column of the first page was made up of short paragraphs of vapid, heartbreaking, infuriating rot entitled Wit and Humor. Nice. You need a little cigar in your hand. I got the white hair. Other than that, it's great. Uh also with us. Paris has the week off again. She is on deadline filing a very complicated story for consumer reports, which we'll hear all about soon. But I'm thrilled to have Mike Elgin joining us. He does a podcast about AI and also a newsletter, machinesociety.ai , longtime friend of uh the network. Uh also our host for those great gastronom ad adventures. Uh you're in you're in the California though today. I am California in southern Silicon Valley, Leo. And um I'm in way northern Silicon Valley. So we're on the opposite ends, yeah. That's right. I I just arrived uh two o'clock this morning, something like that for uh Europe where I'd been since March. Well thank you. I appreciate your doing this with us. Uh my pleasure. He's doing the Schengen Shuffle, he said. The Schengen Shuffle. It's not a dance move, folks. It's uh just leaving the Schengen area so I don't to get get caught. We've we've extended the Schengen area. It's ninety days every hundred and eighty days. Twice we've we've ex we've overstayed it by a day. And they wag their finger at you and they lecture you, but so far no fun Have you ever thought of maybe you know getting a Portuguese passport or some you know, Schengen passport so you can stay? And we have thought about it. We still may do it someday. And that would solve a lot of problems for us. I was watching a YouTube video on the top five places to escape the US . Uh and uh the I think the top one was Georgia, which you turned me on to. You spent time in Tbilisi, and it's where wine was invented. Eight thousand years ago. According to the archaeological record. And also uh certain kinds of bread were invented there. You had me at one. Georgia What is the language of Georgia? Georgian. Georgian. And only Four Georgian. I know how to spike Georgian perfectly good. Well that no, that's the big Georgia. Our state of Georgia is is much larger than the country Georgia, which has four million residents. They have their own alphabet, which is not related to any other alphabet, and their own language, which is unrelated. And so it's like you gotta learn Georgian to live there. That's confusing. Hey, I want to welcome our uh guest for the first segment. As always, we like to interview somebody who's a mover and shaker in the world of AI, and that is absolutely the case with Robert Tursek. He is a futurist. He's an author with an incredible resume. Uh, creative director at MTV back in the day, when back when MTV was cool. When we wanted it. When it played music and stuff. That's right . Wow. That's amazing. You worked at Sony Pictures. You worked with Oprah's uh OWN uh network for digital strateg y. Uh wrote a uh a book that if people still uh qu ote all the time vaporized solid strategies for success in a dematerialized world. And now we are living in that dematerialized world, aren't we? 100%. Leo, when I wrote that book, I thought I was writing about the peak of something. I didn't realize I was writing about the very beginning of a trend that was gonna reshape, you know, not just the world that we live in, but also it's seemingly the whole economy. But that's where we are. Uh you spent a lot of time now talking about AI in Hollywood. In fact, we were before the show talking about an Amazon uh uh uh announcement at uh a movie uh event uh on a back lot. Tell us Beyond the Lot. Yeah. Now the the the event is AI on the lot, which has now emerged as like the preeminent gathering of people that are interested in using artificial intelligence to tell cinematic stories. Doesn't Hollywood hate AI? Well, it's a controversial topic. I think what I would say is uh Hollywood's going through its own version of uh Elizabeth Kubra Ross's cycle of grief as they kind of watch the old business model of the 20th century fade away. You know, remember in the last 10 years, we've seen uh two of the biggest studios get merged into other. You know, these companies have been around for more than a hundred years managing the creative process. One by one, they're getting acquired by tech companies or telecoms companies. Disney's the only one that's left independent. And um and as that happens, they change, they transforms those companies. At the same time, we've also seen a tremendous cutback in the number of shows. We reached peak TV in 2023. There were about 600 shows, scripted shows in production. Now we're down to about 490. So uh there's you a know number of shows that means it comes with layoffs, uh job loss, and runaway production. A lot of productions have moved outside of Los Angeles. So the feeling here is kind of existential dread and fear, as I say, they're kind of a mourning process. And into the mix we throw AI . And that's why it's so incendiary because people are already defensive. Now, I should point out nobody's lost their job to AI yet in the movie business, but it's clearly gonna have an impact. And that's what AI on the lab is there to do. It's there to teach people how to use it and create a community around users and also what's coming next. And what they announced blew my mind, Leo. It was really astonishing. In a good way? Yeah. So I didn't expect this at all. It was held at um the Culver Studios where you and I both had offices back in the day when they were under other management. Now those office now those that studio is owned by Amazon. That's where Amazon Prime TV and MGM Studios are set up. And uh they completely rebuilt the place. It's a state-of-the-art studio now. It's very nice. And so because it was there, Amazon had the opening keynote statement, and Albert Chang is now the newly admitted vice president of AI Studios for Amazon. This is a big deal. This is the first major motion picture company that has launched an AI studio. And they're there to do two things. One is to facilitate MGM studios as their directors want to learn more about AI, they can facilitate those productions. But more importantly, what Albert announced is a new initiative, an AI Creators Fund, where they're actually funding the development and production of original series. They're doing that in partnership with AWS for infrastructure and brickyard for all the AI models. They've created a rich ecosystem of partners that includes uh app developers and all the AI model companies, or many of them that'll probably grow in the future. But most importantly, they're funding creative people who have ideas and they actually lined up some outstanding talent. They announced that three of their uh pilot episodes have been picked up by Amazon Prime uh for video streaming. So they're actually going into series production. This will be the first TV shows in the US that are produced with artificial intelligence. So So that was quite a big announcement. I was really blown away because I didn't expect it to be that big of a story. So are you say they're made with AI? How much is made? Yeah. What what what do these are um animated series that will be generated with AI. I don't know which models they're using. They're probably going to be different because it's three different animators. And I would say the approach that most of Hollywood is taking is a hybrid approach where they fuse AI into the production process in some way. So that's less disruptive to the workforce. It's easier for people to understand because it doesn't upset that classic production, you know, cycle, the left to right uh cycle of development, pre-production, principal photography, and post-production. Um to my mind that doesn't take full advantage of what AI is capable of, but maybe it's a little early for that. It doesn't matter. This reminds me of and this is your era, my era too, in the early 90s, there was a TV show called Reboot that was the first C GI TV animated show. And it it generated both a lot of interest and a lot of hate. Yeah. That's and that's precisely what happened in this case as well. So unfortunately, um no sooner had Amazon made that announcement and and and uh Albert Chang did a masterful job of unveiling that but no sooner had he made the announcement and named the all the three animators that he was going to be working with on those series , then those um those folks start to get attacked uh in social media by people who are um resisting AI. You know, there's a pretty loud loud and vocal uh anti AI group right now. So they they didn't come after Amazon of course. They are cowards. They came after the individual artists. Uh one of the artists, uh Jorge Gutierrez, who's a well respected Mexican American animator, uh he decided to drop out of the project the next day. Oh no. By Friday he dropped out. And that's a real shame because one of the goals they had set was to bring production back to LA. As I mentioned, runaway production is a big issue here. It's cheaper to produce almost anywhere else. And so uh Albert Cheng's vision is that AI makes it possible for a smaller crew to work faster, that's better done locally. He saw this as a way to create more production jobs in LA. And candidly there's a lot of animators looking for work. But now thanks to the AI haters, uh unfortunately some of those jobs are not going to be created and i think it's a real uh own goal like i don't think that they succeeded at anything they're certainly not gonna stop amazon from using artificial intelligence they're not gonna stop any of the motion picture companies from adopting it. The other big news here that's worth hearing about, I think I should mention, is um you recall in 2023 we had strikes uh where you know the uh writers guild and the screened actors guild went on strike um because they could not reach an agreement with the Proersduc associ ation. There were a number of issues there. Some of them were workplace safety or work conditions, some of them were pay and residuals. But a principal issue was artificial intelligence, and they could not come to terms. So everybody went on strike. And what happened, of course, it's not just the writers and actors who are on strike. It shut the whole city down. So, you know, even the union crews and the teamsters, all the production stopped. Uh every TV show that was in production stopped. The studios eventually started to run out of shows for their streaming services. Took six months to closed the city down. We still haven't recovered entirely from that um from that incident. Well, that was a three-year deal. So now this year, 2026, three years later, it was time for renewals. And I was thinking, oh my gosh, are we gonna have another round of strikes? As it happens, no. Uh in fact, the writers was able to work out their differences very quickly this time, and they got what they needed, the protection they sought, the control that they sought over AI. So they got what they needed from the producers. And in exchange, the producers got a four-year deal. And now here's the most amazing thing, Leo . The screen actors who were so vehemently opposed to synthetic actors, you know, virtual real uh let's say uh uh um AI actors, generated actors, they were completely opposed to that. They've been very loud and outspoken about remember that stunt Tilly Norwood last year, sort of a virtual character. They were very outspoken and very dismissive of that. Well, the new SAG agreement with the AMPTP allows for synthetic actors with certain conditions, certain constraints. They're gonna have to work closely with the guild to get permission to do this, but they've opened the door now to synthetic actors acting alongside humans. This is a big deal. I mean, this is real progress. And I don't see it as bad or as a threat. I see this as Hollywood reinventing itself because the old business model's broken. We know that. The cost structure is bloated. It's uh they can't seem to get under control. And the solution so far has been to cut the number of shows or move them overseas where they can be produced cheaper. But this is a way to bring production back and take advantage of the advantages of AI. And there are many and many affordances of AI that people should consider. Yeah, to expand on what you're saying, people think of AI in movies and they think, well, it's just gonna be Will Smith eating spaghetti until the end of time or something like that. But actually, there's like a you know, ten thousand different things that people do to make movies and many of those can be uh augmented or improved or replaced by AI. For example, Martin Scorsese uh is pro AI. He's he's a uh uh an advisor and a uh partner of Black Forest Labs , and he's already using it for things like pre-vis-visualization. Now, this is this is a process that doesn't even touch what you see on the screen, but it helps it's uh use it the same way we're all using it, which is to think through problems to to understand and visualize things. And and that's just one of a million different things. And the other point I wanted to make, and I'm sure you agree with this, the audience will decide what's acceptable and what isn't going forward with AI. For example, when they removed Superman's mustache, right, not through AI, but they, you know, they they mess around with that and they they got hammered by the audience. The am the audience will hammer the bad uses of this stuff, and the good uses uh will be rewarded. And, you know, there will always be zero AI movies. If you look at Top Gun Maverick or F1, one of the things that were that everybody loved about those movies was that they didn't use any CGI. These are action, you know, fast-moving action movies where they strapped cameras in creative ways to fast moving vehicles and it was thrilling, right? And it was thrilling because it didn't have CGI or or uh digital effects. That's what they say. Yeah, that's what they tell you. Uh the fact is that every feature film now is touched by CGI. Computer graphics are integrated and they're just so good that people don't notice. That's the question is will people even know that AI is a spectrum. It's a spectrum. Oh, yeah. Yeah, in two years, Leo, every film is gonna have AI integrated in some way. Like Mike said, it'll be either in the screenplay development process or the evaluation of the screenplay or pre-production visuals or character design or world design or some other aspect of design before you shoot. Pre-visualization is important because it means with AI, you can actually shoot your movie before you shoot your movie, right? So some some crews and cast will not want to work with AI. Fair enough, right? That's going to be their creative choice. But it still means they can still use AI to figure out what the heck they're doing before they get to the set and design the shots so carefully that what they're doing on stage will be done much more efficiently. And that's what we have to do to get the cost under control. People don't realize this, but the average movie cost about a hundred million dollars. So a ninety-minute film cost about a hundred million dollars. That's about a million dollars a minute. That's a lot of money. The average uh high-end Netflix episode, let's say a show like Wednesday, cost 20 million an episode. That's $300,000 a minute. Wednesday cost $20 million an episode. It's absurd. When Game of Thrones did that 10 years ago, it was a record. Now it's a norm. Like now a bunch of mediocre shows cost $20 million. That's $300,000 per minute. Okay. Can they make that money back or is that untenable? They do, they clearly do. Well, it's not sustainable in the sense that uh these streaming services are not all making money, most of them are using money. So it's so the solution there is to do fewer but more expensive productions. It's not a sustainable solution. But let me put it in contrast with you. When I started Newark Studios a couple of years ago, this is an AI studio that's based up in uh Montreal. We were able to produce at about $2,000 per minute. Um, today we've got that under a thousand dollars a minute. By the end of this year, it'll be under $300 a minute. And I thought that was remarkable because that's like a uh four X uh four orders of magnitude cheaper than a motion picture minute. But that's nothing. In China today, the micro dramas have all switched to using AI workflows entirely AI crew cast everything is AI and um they're producing at 30 dollars a minute that's a 3000x cost advantage over Hollywood's motion pictures. So for people who say we're never going to use AI, never is a very long time. When you have a 3,000X cost advantage, you have no choice but to embrace this technology. And meanwhile, the quality is getting better and better. If you haven't looked yet at Google's Gemini Omni, you've got to go check it out because the quality is mind-blowingly good. Now it's not perfect, it's still on Candy Valley, there's still work to do. I'm not out here to be a cheerleader. The point is that it's pretty evident that just in a space of four years, they've improved it so much that just a couple more years out, it will be indistinguishable to most people, at which point everyone's gonna use it. And what strikes me, Robert, that's so important about this is that it's gonna bring in other people who can now tell their stories that they otherwise couldn't have told. They didn't have the money, they didn't have the the connections, they couldn't get through the gauntlet. Um with someone who's working in Vietnam and like, you know, there are countries all over the world. I spent a lot of time in my career in Southeast Asia. Um everyone there, every Asian tiger country has recognized that South Korea has done something remarkable. Before the pandemic, if I told you that a that a Korean movie was gonna win an Oscar or that a Korean show would be the number one show on Netflix or that a Korean pop band would be the most popular band in the world, you would have laughed at me. Today those are facts, right? You got get BTC, you got Exactly the squid Game. Yeah. So if you go to uh if you go to Taiwan or the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, uh Indonesia, or Thailand, these countries have a lot of great storytellers. They have a lot of great cultural lore. What they don't have is a lot of people who speak English the way Californians do. Well with AI, you could easily produce a show there and then revoice the whole thing in American English, actually change the actors and make them into American looking actors. What's gonna happen now is the one way flow of content from the United States to other countries is gonna be reversed. The US will become an import territory for products that are made elsewhere. This is gonna cause Americans to work harder and be more competitive. I think it's gonna be a good thing for stories. I think we're gonna get more diversity of perspective and lived experience from around the world. You got it. But what about all the craftspeople, the talented people who will be out of work? Is there an answer for them? So I don't buy it. Um I know people are worried about that scenario. There's no evidence of that happening. In fact, it's going the opposite way. If you use AI as I do every day, it creates a lot more work. Uh and it actually creates really interesting work. It can. Yes. Yes. So I don't think I don't think it's going to displace people. No, it's certainly true if we're you know if we're not using a lot more crews than uh you know then probably what are those people going to do but these tools are accessible to just to build on Jeff's point anybody can teach themselves how to become competent in these tools in a matter of weeks sometimes just a day or two you can get you can get some mastery, right? So if you have a story to tell, and everybody on a film crew thinks they're gonna be a director, literally the script supervisor thinks she's gonna be the next director, right? So everybody's got a story to tell. There's no real barrier anymore. If you got a story to tell, get out there and tell your story. I think we're gonna see a thousand X increase in the number of scripted narratives that are being produced, and I think that's a good thing. You know, there's a lesson in YouTube with all this. Uh that's exactly what happened at YouTube. It made it possible for anybody to create video and distribute it. VidCon man. And there is bad there's bad content, but uh I think I don't know who said it, maybe it was me, that yes, you have more content, but you also have the if the percentage stays the same of good content, you're gonna have more good content at the same time. I just went to a movie uh called Back Rooms on Friday night by a YouTuber. Yeah. Very it's a very interesting story, Kane Pixels, who uh took a liminal single, they call it a creepy pasta from 4chan, turned it into a YouTube hit, uh twenty million downloads of the first video, over several years, created a whole bunch of backrooms kind of weird creepy liminal spaces and got a deal with Hollywood he's 20 years old got a 10 million dollar budget built a 30 000 square foot set by, the way, it wasn't AI generated . He did his uh YouTube stuff with Blender. But this he built a he built a practical set and shot this movie. And uh it I think over the weekend was the fourth grossing uh horror film of all time that made 80 million dollars or m more than eighty million dollars in the first weekend. I was there, uh Kane uh the reason I know all about this is he's from Petaloma is from our town and he was there uh on opening night and my uh twenty four year old who I didn't know it but, he had an async corpse sticker on ice car. I said I said, you know, he put it there a year ago. I said, what's that? He said, uh it's just some YouTube thing. He was so excited. He got his picture taken. And at this so that's one, but then there was an another movie. Um I can't remember the name. Obsession. Obsession. Yeah, yeah. This is a the new generation of filmmakers and they're coming from YouTube. No, and what's really important is uh Disney released a huge picture and uh Star Wars So these films that are produced on a shoestring by indie producers that nobody's ever heard of, but they have a great story to tell, they're clobbering the blockbusters that we rely on so much to keep these voices line. And there's clearly a lesson there for Hollywood, right? I mean Yeah, if if Hollywood decides to back more independent voices and tell more un conventional stories, that's that's only good. Yeah. What I can't believe is that the Green Lit another Avengers movie. Like how do you think we have to see the same story? I know how it ends. The shiny thing is gonna get caught by the Avengers . Stop stop with the Avengers. Do you think that um uh we'll we'll just back up and change the process if you're a screenwriter? Will you be expected to to do a storyboard through AI or to to visualize it more? Um will it change the creative process at at other levels? Um it it will change the creative pro cess with writers in particular. So these guys were the original like anti-A I haters back in 2023. They were like, you know, chat GPT is a plagiarism machine and so on. Um most writers that I know have come around now to try it because they've checked it out. Paul Schrader, famous you know, film uh screenwriter who wrote uh Taxi Driver and another other a number of other films, he came out about a year and a half ago and said, I don't know why everybody's so against this stuff. It's actually quite great. I asked it to write a screenplay in the style of Paul Schrader . Oh man. And I was pretty impressed. And he said, then I asked it to redo it in the voice of Quentin Tarantino. And then he just started going through all the writers he knew. He's like, it's actually pretty impressive. So um uh he's not against it. No, no writer will tell you that But he already made his bundle. I mean he doesn't he's not at risk. He's in the zero F business right now. But but you know it got bust. I think it's great that he's out there saying it. What he's doing is making save space for a younger generation of writers to embrace this. Now anybody who writes, including me, you know that you try to let the machine write for you, it's gonna be boring mediocre, terrible. You can't let it do that. But what it can do is it can help you structure plot, narrative, plot points, it can keep continuity, it can fact check for you. So if you treat it like in a an an assistant, uh I think it's quite useful and it can really compress the creative uh cycle where you're trying to explore ideas because it generates ideas so fast. So there's benefit to it. Jeff, to your other part of your question though, is the creative process. So um we have a strange creative process here. The the the Hollywood motion picture production process hasn't changed in a hundred years. You start with a script, right? the process of developing that script into a s a script that can be shot. Then you go into pre-production. This is the planning cycle and sometimes there's pre-visualization or some design elements that happen. Then you go into principal photography and now it's the domain of the director on the stage and you're shooting. You have real actors. Okay, that finishes, they wrap that up. Now you have a bunch of film. That goes over to the editors into post-production and now we add special effects. But that process has really been established since the nineteen tens by a guy named Tom Ints, who was one of the original producers in the silent era , he was so impressed by Henry Ford and the assembly line that he mimicked the assembly line for motion pictures. He was like we can systematize it. And the studios were looking for a way to um they didn't want to have to be dependent on labor. They were very worried about unions and and this is before the unions were organized. So they thought if we de-skill the jobs, we can prevent unionization from happening. So the studios adopted it. Well they haven't changed in a hundred years. That linear left to right process is actually a fatal flaw today because the problem with it is all the creative decisions are made up front in the pre-production stages. And then they're locked on the stage during pr during principal photography or production. Well, where we're hiring most of the new people, at least 70% of the new hires since the 1990s have been in post-production. These are the most creative people that are being hired, the new hires, and they're the least empowered to do anything because all the creative decisions were locked in that linear left-to-right industrial process. AI is going to wipe that out because the great thing about artificial intelligence is you can change your mind. You can iterate. And you can go crazy with it and iterate too much, of course. We've all done that, right? You go down the rabbit hole and you do 47 drafts in an afternoon. Um, but what's cool about AI is uh if you've ever edited anything, you're s you find yourself in uh edit bay and you're wishing that you got one more shot, a reverse angle, a reaction shot, or just a different angle on a scene. You don't have it because the film crew shot it and they chuck it over the fence to you in post production. You're stuck with what they shot. Well with AI now, you're never gonna have that problem again. And in fact, it gets even better. And this is one of the things we built at Nura Studios, the company I started. This is what we started with and is a in mind. What if I get halfway through the production and I realize actually I don't like the lead actor or the lead actress? I want to change that person. You can do it and you can do a global replace. Now this is mind-bending, right? Because then if you think of it that way, you go, oh, what if I wanted to localize this film for an audience in India? Gee, well then I'd love to be able to have all the actors speak Hindi. Oh no, wait a minute. They also speak Tamil. Oh wait, there's a thousand other dialects. Wow. I can re-render the show and so I won't have a single show, a master. I'll end up with versions that are living versions that are highly localized. This is all possible and it will happen. It's not a good do? Talk talk about Nora. Uh Nora has built an end-to-end pipeline and work flow for animated series. So Neura Studios, it's Neurostudios.ai. They're based up in Canada. And it's a bunch of machine learning experts who are experts in graphics. And the company zeroed in on animation for the simple reason that um live action today still is pretty uncanny value and I think that's going to persist for a couple more years. You can notice it and if it if it's even a little bit uncanny value it kind of is off putting. It it jolts you out of the narrative. And so you can't really commit to the uh story. But we're a lot more forgiving about what we'll accept in the city. Yeah, Pixar knew this. That's why they they didn't have humans in Toy Story. They had toys in Toy Story. Yeah. And what AI is great at is animation. Right now, you can animate any style. Um I don't I don't want to claim that Neura's the only company focused. Of course not. There's a hundred other companies competing on this. Um but we what we just saw, for instance, I saw a demo by Google of Gemini Omni. That's their new model. It's really remarkable. And they're very sensitive. Everyone's very sensitive to this idea of artists wanting agency and control over the AI. They don't want to feel like they're being stolen from. So they showed a painter who paints with chalk and acrylics and she trained Google Omni Google's uh Gemini Omni model on her style to make like her own version and now it's animating stories in the style of her painting. That's the real value. You can try a painter. You can see right behind me. Like I would kill to be able to do that. I can't wait. And it's gonna be available to everybody now, this year, right? So there this isn't like way out in the future. That's what's happening right now. I think this is the most exciting set of changes for the motion picture industry, which candidly has gotten ossified and predictable and very repeated. Uh I think it's the most exciting change that I've seen in my entire career in Los Angeles. It's a little more nuanced than that. If the um if most of the work is done by the AI , so if all you did was a text prompt, yeah, then you're right, it's not eligible. If the machine is doing the work, but you know, Leo, that's not gonna last for very long. First of all, the move movie companies, they're gonna get that changed, right? A lot of that can Sony Bono may be gone, but there are people. Yeah. But but the fact is if you talk to anyone who's using AI to make a film, they're not writing a fr a prompt. Like nobody sits down and says, Oh, I'm gonna make a story about two teenagers, you know. There's an enormous amount of effort that goes into designing each scene, designing each character, doing three. There's actually a demo on neurostudios.ai of how your tool works. And it is clearly more than just typing a prompt. It is a ton of work. Yeah. Yeah. And and the systems can help here because you're also creating a tremendous number of assets. This is one of the great things that Neuras solve for is asset management. Today people are using like multiple AI models to make a film. They're using like Google Drive to store all their different shots and character designs. This is a nightmare. You want to this is a great use of AI by the way because it can keep track of all that stuff for you and say wait a minute and that scene he's supposed to be wearing this outfit, or that's the scene where they came out of the snow field, they should be covered with snow, and it'll remind you about continuity the way script supervisor might in the past. So, actually, this is a great way for humans and AI are uh to work together to build something artistic, but bear in mind that artist is always in control with a company like Nura. They're always in control. Uh and and and I think that's widely shared. You know, Google, Amazon, all these companies, they see that that's necessary. Human storytellers are going to be at the lead and nobody wants to watch a story that's created by a machine. Haven't you haven't you are um advocated for the idea that the humans uh role in this partnership with AI is the part that that can and should be copyrighted and not the output, that we need to move from away from the output model to the process model. How would that work? I think you're right. Well look, we had the we've been through this before. Um when when photography was invented in the eighteen twenties and 30s. Uh, the copyright office took a dim view of it and they said, well, it's just a box, all you're doing is pushing a button, the camera's doing all the work. And it took 30 years before the copyright office came around to the notion that there's things like, you know mise on sun and framing and lighting and props and design and direction. And finally the copyright authors realize actually there is a human author behind that box. The box is just a tool akin to a paintbrush. Now here's the funny part. Um I can't get a copyright if I use an AI model to generate a film from just a text prompt, right? The copyright office has said I can't do that today. But what I can do is I can take a picture or shoot a film on this iPhone. Okay. What people don't realize is that my iPhone is loaded with AI. Right. So Apple has all sorts of AI. They don't advertise it as such because they know people don't care about that. They people people care about making a good photo. When I use my iPhone, um if when I hold it up before I even touch that red button, it's already taken eight shots. And it picks the best one. It might be the one that I took, but it might be one of the eight that it took. I don't know. How would you know? Maybe it's harmonizing between all of them and taking an average. We don't even know. The point here is that I can get a copy right on a photo that I take with my iPhone, which is already being done by AI, the white balance, the color frame, the focus, the you know, the color temperature, and so forth. That's all done by AI, but I can't do that if I use a PC connected to say runway in the cloud. Now, how does that make sense? So it's such an inconsistent position. I can predict with some certainty that the copyright office is gonna walk that back. Yeah. Robert, talk about how uh you and I have had this conversation uh offline how you're help using AI to help you develop your ideas you're working on on on uh nonfiction ideas yeah you use it so I use it for fiction as well so um yeah well I think you gotta eat your dog food, right? And if you wanna master AI, you need to get make it a hobby, right? You can't just use it for work. You have to actually kind of find a fun, rewarding project. Um Jeff, my new thing I do is I tell it what ingredients I have in my fridge and I say, hey, I'm interested in making a soup and a salad and it generates a range of options for me and then it'll tell me what else I need to pick up at the grocery store and actually I've done these recipes they're very good like this this is a great way to use Claude, the cook what use what's in your fridge, right? Um I'm often invited to give a speech, and in the old days I would labor for weeks trying to figure out what I was gonna say and then do a bunch of research, and then I'd have to fact check it to make sure it was accurate and all that. Now I've created a series of agents that talk to each other and um I can sit down with my notes. I always start with my own notes because I it's my speech, it's not the AI's speech. But the first thing I'll do is I'll say, hey, here's a bunch of random notes. Can you put these in a logical sequence? Give me three or four options. And it'll say you can start like this and this way or here's another works with me like uh editor uh then I'll say hey cool go fact check these five claims and it'll come back and say well you're not entirely wrong but here's some places where you could double check often I'll fact check that with another AI just to make sure. Yeah . Then I'll start to develop the themes. And of course I do that writing part myself. But then I'll say to the AI , I want you to attack this idea. Attack the core premise here, see, and then I'll say, Great, now come at it from a point of view of a libertarian, or come at this from the point of view of a copyright maximalist, whatever the topic is. You know, I'll say, come at it from a different perspective. This is quite useful. Or, you know, I'm talking to an audience and it's going to consist of a lot of college kids who are kind of jaded and sardonic. Give me that reaction. And so this is really helpful because it forces you to confront other perspectives of your own material. When you're writing you're you're isolated, right? So you might only hear the voice in your head uh this is like inviting other people in the room in a way it's like a virtual writer's room uh and I can take that all the way through to a finished uh artifact because it'll help you create slides it'll help you create other material now as an artist, I prefer to do that stuff myself. But I don't I'm not opposed to using AI as a smart assistant. The thing I would say though is just like an assistant, a human assistant, you can't entirely trust it, no matter how clever it is. So you have to check the work. So AI creates a lot of work. And the funny thing about agents is they drift. And so you have to check the agents. Even if you think they're running well, sometimes they might not be. They might be up to something else. So there's a as I say, AI creates work. It doesn't necessarily reduce the amount of work. That's the interesting thing about all this, because we've been talking about the use of AI in all kinds of filmmaking process. You're talking about it in making a speech. I use AI extensively in in my writing, uh never to write my stuff ever. But but basically for all these different things. And so you can you can feel the emerging skill set that's necessary to use these tools well when you do this. As you're saying, you can go through and you can fact like I have this gnarly fact-checking uh prompt that that just is really thorough, it scores itself, does all these amazing things. I have to know I have to have so much good judgment because it's very persuasive about making a claim that something is false or or is misleading or whatever. And I have to have a lot of really good judgment to to interpret that and to dismiss things, to accept it, to rem to have it remind me of something else that I need to go check. And so that's the skill. We need more critical thinking skills than we used to need to do these kinds of creative tasks. True. Yeah, it's true. In fact, it's harder cognitive work because you're having to work at look at somebody else's writing. There was a great article in the Atlantic about what happens when you let the AI write for you. Um, and it was written by a book editor who's getting book submissions. You guys are probably familiar with this. The book industry now is getting inundated with AI-generated proposals. And she said the problem with it isn't just that it, you know, the cliches or the triple beat tempo that it uses or that construction of, you know, it's not X, it's Y, all those things are pretty obvious tells. She said, what's worse about it is that it presents bullshit that is not actually structured thinking at all. It's just a sequence of words that seems logical, but then when you probe on any part of that sentence, the thing makes no sense. The whole paragraph falls apart and she said there's nothing to work with as an editor. Like there is it's not like this is a poorly articulated but good idea. It's not an idea. It's just articulated like words in a sequence. It's just random words. Yeah. Or sequence of words But but it's also teaching us something about what a creative work is, what a movie is, what a movie script is, what a speech is, and what a what an article is. It's a perspective from a point of view. And when you get some when you have AI writing for you, it's a it's a perspective from no point of view in particular. And that's the thing that we need to drill down on and to really understand about the communication between a cre uh content creative and the audience. Yeah. AI doesn't have discernment and it doesn't have taste. And honestly, it's too prolix. Like it also doesn't know how to stop. Uh those are all things Well we know how to stop and we have used your time and I I think we've used it wise wisely. Thank you, Robert, Teresa . Such a pleasure. Robert does a podcast called The Futurists. It's a great podcast. Yeah, absolutely worth listening to. You can find that uh wherever you get your podcasts, as they say. Uh and boy, you know, I looking at your C V, you have been doing this. It did the MTV thing. I forgot about seventh level. We yeah, when when I was working back uh with Ziff Davis and then later uh tech TV and the site, man, we were so excited when Lil Howie uh came out on C D ROM. It was the first interactive C D ROM. I went to your launch I went to your launch party. It was so much fun. That that's probably where we met the first time. I think so. Yeah, Gina Smith was very excited about it. She said, This is so cool. You gotta find out about seventh level. So we we do go back a ways. And what's interesting is you've been on the cutting edge of all of these new technologies as they emerge. That's true. If you're interested in hearing more of my thoughts, check out my substack, which is just touristic.substack dot com. That's where I write long reads twice a month. Um I'm about to publish another one right now. Thanks so much for having me. Leo, Jeff, Mike. Great to see you all. Thank you for including me today. Really appreciate your time, Robert. Great to talk to you. I'd like to have you back too, because I think we just began to scratch the surface. And I hope eventually Hollywood uh comes around and understands that this is uh this is a good thing. That it's it's a positive thing. If it doesn't, we'll build a new Hollywood in Jersey. Well, and anything that puts creativity in the hands of everybody is always always a good thing, I think. Yeah. Thank you, Robert . Syner. Ted K, Robert Ters ek, everybody. All right, we'll have more intelligent machines in just a moment, but first a word from Expo . This is actually a really great AI story. AI has changed the pace of everything from how software develops uh to how movies get made to how you get attacked. Engineering teams are moving faster than ever, creating more and more applications, but security hasn't really kept up. One of the most trusted ways to test your security is pen testing, right? Still one of the best ways to understand real exploitable risk. But in an AI-driven world, it can become a bottleneck because pen testers don't work as fast as the as the malware authors do. Security teams are ch forced to choose between slowing down development to stay secure or moving fast and accepting, yeah, there are going to be some gaps in the coverage. Not with Expo. XBOW. You I know you know the name. They're the probably the best known pen testing company ever, ever, anywhere. Expo elimin ates that trade-off. Expo , XBOW is an autonomous offensive security platform that runs continuous AI-driven pen test ing. It's awesome. It mirrors real-world attacks. You've got real experts behind the scenes telling the AI where to go, what to do. Expo doesn't just scan for vulnerabilities. This thing discovers, exploits, and valid ates them. So you're only dealing with issues that actually matter. That means dramatically fewer false positives and a clear view into real attack paths. With Expo, tests run in hours, not weeks. You get complete visibility into how an attacker would move through your systems, and you get the ability to uncover issues that traditional tools miss, including zero days, novel attack paths. Expo's results speak for themselves. Ask the application security lead of CESNAM.CZ. He says, quote, even right now after one year, I don't know any other company that is at least close to Expo in terms of agentic pend The result is a predictable cost, consistent quality, stronger security, without slowing down your engineers. Expo helps security teams keep pace with innovation and cover more apps, more often with the resources they already have. Co-pilot, uh it's already trusted by companies ranging from fast growing startups to Fortune 500 enterprises. You I mean you'll see Expo's name everywhere. They are quickly becoming a mission critical layer in modern security stacks. And I'm glad we could tell you about them. And I think you right now should go to expo.com to start a pen test today. That's expo . com. Thank him so much for supporting intelligent machines . That was fun talking to Robert. Isn't he great? Wow. So I worked with his brother, Tom Turs ik. It's an amazing family. And the third brother does something amazing too. Tom and I were partners at an early uh news startup called um Daylife. May it rest in peace. Oh, okay. Um well he's a great painter too. I mean I'm looking at the paint the paintings behind him. I said, These are beautiful. Where'd you get those? He says, I painted them. Yeah. Oh yeah. He is a creative. Yeah. Very talented person. Yeah. Yeah. Well, there was a lot of AI news as there always is this week. Who would have thought Microsoft uh you must have had a fun time on on Micro I never did I don't normally look at Microsoft for AI news, frankly. There's Microsoft news, the Wall Street stuff is amazing what's happening there. There's tons of news. Oh my god, oh my god, oh my god . At the beginning of the show, it's like there is so much news. We'll start with Jensen Wong at Computex. That was uh that was at the beginning of the week on Monday. Uh he boy, I mean he gave Microsoft a lot of airtime, talked about a new chip that uh NVIDIA is gonna do the RTX Spark , which is designed for laptops. Microsoft announced a Surface Laptop Ultra that'll be available later this year, as did most of the other big PC makers, HP and Dell and Lenovo and so forth. Microsoft created a mini surface dev box with this RTX Spark in it. Of course, we talked a lot about that . They also uh I mean gosh, I do I didn't even the new models. Um the smartest open US model uh according to the decoder Nemo Tron 3 Ultra . Um a lot of what though I have to say my takeaway uh increasingly with Jensen Wong is he is um de you know, what do they call it, dealing his own book. He is everything they're doing. Getting high on his own supply. Yeah, he's well yes, but is he also enabling the industry? Yeah, his pitch is though everything will be better if you use CUDA and NTX and uh and so let me ask you a few questions. By the way, I just put a post up um trying to analyze and praise Jensen Wong as a communicator. I think he's very show. He's phenomenal. Yeah. And I think AI would be a lot better off if we had people like Jensen Wong and Jan Lak un rather than people like uh Elon Musk and Sam Altman talking about the industry. you'll stay for a minute, because you've been covering um PCs for so so long, grand pa. Um what uh as has Mike, by the way. I just one of my own Mike have been covering for a long time as well. Mike used to edit uh the editor in chief of Windows. I was the editor in chief of Windows magazine for a decade. So I really want to hear about about this notion of a laptop uh with um uh an NVIDIA chip. Well I this wanna ask Paul why are they making it a laptop? Because Well they also have a box. They also created a box. They did, but the problem with the laptop is cooling form factor is small. It they heat up. You can't ever have as much power in a laptop as you can have in a desktop computer. Uh Paul said, but this is what developers want. Yeah. Yeah. Yes. It's gonna be the macho machine. Well we but it won't it'll be on Windows, not CUDA. How does CUDA fit in? I'm just trying to do it. No, no, no, it's Windows. CUDA run can run under Windows. So that was in some ways that was a big victory for Microsoft because Microsoft has not traditionally been seen, especially because Apple's uh Apple Silicon is really very, very good, especially in memory bandwidth for uh for AI. Uh most most people who are using uh AI locally like me on my framework are using Linux. Uh NVIDIA's own boxes ship with Ubuntu Linux. That's the let's look at the big big picture here. When you're talking about so um what Apple, what we learned from Apple, Mark German of course, uh writing about where Apple's going with iPhones, and then this announcement, basically I think in the same week. Basically what this adds up to is we're about to enter into an era where many of the tasks, probably most of the tasks that we'd normally happen in the cloud on uh in the AI chatbot uh sites are gonna happen on the device. So in the case of iPhones, they're gonna build, you know, they're going to have AI running on the device and and these laptops are going to have AI running on the device. And they're also going to be this traffic cop feature that will know when to kick it over to the cloud for really big jobs and so on. This is clearly the future of where this stuff is going. And this is a massive uh uh thing for the industry, especially because now for you know, we were as we're heading towards smart glasses and all this stuff it's like what do we need iPhones for? What do we need phones for? Well, this is why we need phones, because they're supercomputers. They're going to be super powerful. Apple and Microsoft and NVIDIA, they're all going to be able to charge a lot for these devices because they're going to be very, very, very powerful. No, they did not mention device . Yeah, but they're no they're no longer d dumb dumb terminals to the cloud. Right. They they are both dumb terminals to cloud and supercomputers that are expensive because they're very, very powerful. They're running local models. Which I think they're a little ahead of the curve on that because I've yet to seen a local model that is as good as uh the cloud. In fact, you know, I'm looking at the hardware they're trying to sell, and you could get a lot of uh f you know c tokens for that. I mean you can't are you gonna get a laptop like this? No of course not. No. on a laptop, that's three years of Claude Max twenty X. There's uh which I could run on a Raspberry Pi and be as effective. I well if the company's paying for it, I'll get one. Yeah, well and that's I think the RAM didn't enterprise which wants to run its own models for security and privacy reasons. I still want to run my own model, but I'm not willing to pay that much money for it. I'm actually my framework. The NVIDIA chip as a as news for for personal computers. Google's TPUs are on our phones. Is Google in a sense already ahead there in terms of putting AI chips on devices? Uh ironically, the NVIDIA chips also have uh uh take Really? But yeah. But uh no, I don't think so. Um where Google might be ahead is in their uh very small models. They have some technology that's very good at compressing models. And so Gemma uh and their their really small versions of Gemini are more competent, I think, than other models of that size. But a small model still is not as good. You know, Apple's going to announce on Monday probably very similar kinds of capabilities on the iPhone, and there's a lot more iPhones in people's pockets than there are Google Phones. Right. Well and that's another thing that's really important. Yeah. There are a lot of things that uh you you know, not co they're not good enough for coding, right? Sure. But they're absolutely good enough to be agentic to go out and search for stuff on the internet, to buy stuff for you, even to do uh auto correction and grammar checking and spelling and even uh translation. Um the on-device models are actually pretty good at translating uh and also they they'll be able to go out and fetch data like d like like um like we learned in the in the last uh in the interview. Uh Apple before you even press a button is already taking pictures, it's already gathering information in preparation for doing computational photography. They'll do the same thing. If as you're walking around with your smart glasses powered by Apple's iPhone, right, uh it will be gathering local information in anticipation of you asking questions about what's happening in your environment. So the this is this is going to be you know the vast, majority of today of queries or whatever you wanna call it, prompts uh to AI chop bots are super banal stuff. Like people asking at Google search type things like, you know, when when does so and so movie come Uh uh to that point, uh Microsoft Build, which is going on right now, uh they have uh a project Solera. Uh we talked about that also earlier today on Windows Weekly. Uh Stevie Batish, who is really uh kind of an amazing communicator uh on this subject uh is is running this and this is his uh blog post. Th it this is a form factor that could be a pin, it could be glasses, it could be they actually are showing uh examples on an uh Amazon Echo like device, um, but they also show it on a smart card. Um the idea is this is an agent-first computing. And so the the the it is it is on device. It is with you wherever you are. Uh doctors would use it, you know, in this in this this imaginary uh world that they have uh envisioned here for Project Solera. Um they are making models for this. They announced a bunch of models. They are making chips. You can see they have MediaTech and Qualcomm chips. The MediaTech chip by the way is the is the NVIDIA chip. NVIDIA part interestingly with uh Media Tech, not Qualcomm to make that chip. Um so define now agent v app . They say it's it's agents not apps. But aren't you an isn't an agent an app? No. Okay, so so explain that to me. Yeah, so so what how do we definition? So our first exposure our first exposure to AIs were these chatbots, right? Chat GPT in an app, whether it's an app on your phone or an app on your desktop. You type in something and it types something back. And you can even engage in a conversation back and forth. And then eventually they even added memory so that it would remember your previous conversations and would store information about what you talked about. But all of a sudden, starting late last year, as you know, because I was talking about it and everybody was talking about it, people started coding on the command line. Uh Claude Code was the first. And that's where coders really had an experience. In the early days of coding with a chat app, you would say, well, how do I write a write me a Python script and you'd copy it and you'd paste it in. Or maybe you had an editor that would have a sidebar that the thing would or there would be autocomplete. It was not a great experience. And it certainly didn't uh help with vibe coding. Vibecoding kind of stormed the castle and people just got to the point where there were weren't they weren't writing any code at all. They were just typing a prompt in the command line and then the the agent would or the uh AI would type the code. The agent, a genet AI, which we've talked a lot about, is what kind of took off with OpenClaw. And that is sort of like a command line. You could run it on a command line. These days you could also run it uh in an app, Perplexity's computer, or uh ChatGPT has a computer like app . It has memory. It remembers your previous work. It is able to do multiple sessions at once. It's able to delegate out to multiple agents in the same time. but an agent most importantly does is remember and work constantly. And so from a consumer perspective. I get all that. But from a cause for for this Solara , I bought a box and it's an it's an agent box. Right. Am I gonna have an agent store? Am I gonna just give it commands and that's all I want? Well, it's a question of whether you're the store because you may just say, Get me an Uber and you won't need the Uber app, obviously. So yes, but the idea is it's always there, it's always on, it's always listening, it's always recording. Mm-hmm. It knows everything about you, your day, your priorities, your interests. Um you know you don't have to do that. So it's not a collection of agents as apps would be in an app store. It is your agent period. Yeah it's your agent which then works through other agents. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. Okay. Right. So so one of the things is the agenda uh AI can do is it can basically conjure up another agent uh and basically intercommunicate. But the other thing is you won't you won't s you won't say call me an Uber, you'll say get me a ride. And you won't even check lift. It'll take, you know, the boss The end game may even be you don't even say that. It just knows that you're you have an appointment in a half an hour and pay my late loaded carcass to this other place by six. Right. Right. So so that's that's the kind of the evolution uh uh people imagine anyway of all this. Um you know, they're all just different versions of the same thing. It's but the capability is going up. So from a chat bot where you kind of have a conversation, or maybe you give it a prompt and it gives you a picture, which is what most people still to this day, that's their experience of AI, to the command line vibe coding interface to the agentic. I mean the way I just How real is Solara? How soon are there real devices? But it it was more Microsoft saying at build this is where we're going. And this is like a concept car. Yeah, this is what Stevie Batish does. He's the kind of the big thinker at Microsoft who says, okay, this is where AI is going to be, and this is where we're putting our efforts. What they did say is here's the chip, here's the models, here's the laptops, here's the desktops. They they announced a bunch of stuff to support. Trevor Burrus If you're Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI, how do you react to that? They're doing the same thing. This is this is what's kind of the dirty little secret of this, there everybody's doing the same thing. And they're all pursuing multiple futures at once. So for example, if you look at Google, uh what they announced, I mean all their apps, maps, you name it, they're all just, you know, you you talk, you know, talk to your spreadsheet and it will you know, it it basically is using AI. They want really, really want you to use AI to interf interface with these legacy apps that have been around forever. So that's a that's another direction. And then I think the ultimate direction of all these things where they all converge, agentic AI, AI based apps, is where you just basically have a device and it just does AI. There's no app s to download. It just basically figures out what to do what you want it to do. It basically cares more about your goals than that's right. What your prompt. And then it figures out how to do it. And so when when do we get there? I don't know. But basically all these there they they appear to be multiple directions, but they're actually all gonna converge in the same result, I think, which is that you talk to your glasses and agentic your agentic Do it for me. Yeah And it's all moving very fast. There was a great O'Malik wrote a really wonderful piece. It starts I don't know if you've read it yet, uh I didn't put it in the rundown. I but uh it's a it's a hysterical piece. Uh it's ohm.om .co . He talks about his uh Mont Blanc pen that he loves, that is the Pinocchio pen, and he uses that to take off on uh the original version of Pinocchio. Um he says, we're living in Pinocchio's world. The original version of Pinocchio, Carlo Colodi's version, which was published in the late 19th century, was really grim. It was not the Disney Pinocchio you're used to. And it was a moral story for children. It wasn't about lying, it wasn't about Pinocchio's nose so much as um uh uh the the w here's what uh Ohm writes. Uh it was aimed at Italian children in the way the nineteenth century aimed things at children, full of suffering, consequence, and moral instruction delivered through catastrophe . The puppet is hanged, he's swallowed by a giant fish. Institutions that should protect him are either absent, corruptive, or absolutely hostile or actively hostile to his interests. This is eighteen eighty one Italy. You can only imagine what it was like in Italy. It was also in the cartoon, by the way. Like if you remember, it was still pretty grim. Pinocchio was got through it all like oh ho ho! I'm gonna be a real boy. It was much grimmer in the original. I remember this because my dad was a big fan of the original Italian version as well as of the Disney cartoon. But he always said, look, it's a little bit darker. So uh what Oh Ohm says is we are living in that world right now uh he talks about one of the ways Pinocchio is uh is exploited is they talk about a magic field where he plants his coins and then the next morning uh more coins will have appeared, and they keep persuading him to plant more coins, and he and of course the new coins do not appear, the old ones disappear into the pockets uh of the uh of the of the fox and the cat. He says the fox and cat are the novel's most modern characters. They persuade Pinocchio to bury his coins in the field of miracles on the promise they'll multiply overnight. Exploit impatience. Exploit greed. Frame skepticism as a failure of imagination and dismiss skeptics as lacking vision. Remind you of anything? NFTs. Yeah. NF and AI. Everyone from Jensen Wong to Sam Altman to Elon Musk spent a decade accumulating what I've called symbolic capital, the reputation, the prestige, the weight of being seen as someone who understands the future better than the rest of us. Now each of them seems to be running some version of the field of miracles with promises that keep not arriving, timelines that dissolve, products that exist primarily as announcements, and platforms run as machines for generating more reputation regardless of what they actually do. They don't need to be right, they need to be believed. This is the line I love the best. Velocity is the new authority. And no one has weaponized that more effectively. Yep. And it's a great analogy. I have not read the O'Malik piece, but the whole mess but I have read uh several times the original Pinocchio in the English translation. And it's really the the the thing that they're warning Pinocchio children, Italian children in eighteen eighty one when it was written, is against laziness and against ignorance. And this is exactly this is exactly what we should be warning people about. You know, when it comes to AI, you can't be lazy and ignorant when you confront this technology uh of uh ai are much like the fox and the cat. They're they've got a field of miracles they want you to plant your coins in. Now Jeff you might say, well Leo, that's not what you've been saying all along here. Because I this is an interesting conflict in my brain. I'm a believer. I use AI and it's incredibly valuable and it's an incredibly useful tool. And at the same time, I also believe that these guys are selling something a little different. Well, but that's that's that's what I'm trying to s in the by the communication in AI. The I th i if you think th the the tech lash for this is what I wrote in my post. The tech lash for the internet and social media took two decades. The the backlash to AI took about three years. Yeah. And I think a lot of that is because it is Elon Musk and Sam Altman and all this talk about Doomers and all this talk about um accelerationism and and and all the people who hang around it, uh Andreessen and uh Teal and all those folks. And I think that they're the wrong people to present AI. Um I I this is why I so admire Jensen Wong, because he doesn't really sell fly into Mars and all that. He's on a practical level. You know that I'm a I'm a fan of Jan Lak un because he talks about uh from a from a research scientist perspective, what it can do and can't do. So I think that AI's problem is the AI boys who are hated and and feared uh because they also follow on what went wrong with the internet with the likes of uh uh uh uh uh of meta . I do think though that Yan Lakun and Jensen Wong are also talking their own book. Of course they are. Of course they are. But they do it in a different way. They're good at it. But I still see that there's they're asking you to plant coins in their field of miracles. And Sam Altman's are morally decrepit kind of people. They're bad people. They don't like people. They you know th and and I you don't get that from uh vibe from Jensen Wang but Wang. But um but the other thing is that they're not sh everybody else in the AI world is shooting for a direction, a a general concept of AI. He's advocating for literally all of them. So he's a so there there's a there's a battle between do we have humanoid robots or robotic everything? He's like, yes, all of those. He's like, uh do we do we train robots in, you know, using people like with the with the VR thing and uh or do we use physical AI? And he's like, yeah, we do both of those. In fact, we sell both of those. And anyway, he's just they're in such a great position. Uh uh and video is in perfect position because they're there to support literally every single thing. Yes, we're we're we're gonna f the data centers can be filled with with and also your laptop. Remember last week's website of the week? Is AI profitable yet? The answer is no. And you look at all the companies and the money they're spending. Wait till you get to the bottom. There's NVIDIA. Sure, they're there. They want everybody to use their chips. They're enabling. Wait till we get to the IPO news this week around anthropic spaces. Well, let's take a break and let's do that. all that Yeah, yeah. Really interesting. Uh the money is flowing. I don't know if it's a bubble, uh, but the money is flowing. Um it we think it will flow, but I was still She's actually doing her job. Uh unlike Nick Bilton. She's doing her job. Oh, he's doing his job, tearing it down. He's doing somebody else's job, it feels like. Can we t we should talk about that too when we come back? Because I I mean Nick was a regular on Twit for years. Uh uh so uh anyway I I ha I would like to know your opinion about all of that as well. Uh but anyway, Paris does uh we'll be back. She says I think we hope next week. She hopes that next week she'll breathe again. It's unpredictable because she she's she's really buried deep in this one right now. But anyway, we miss her. But we're so glad we can get Mike Elgin on. Mike, of course, has a great newsletter, machinesociety.ai, that talks about all of this his podcast uh as well uh with uh Emily Forlini. I gotta remember to use her her new name, Emily Frellini, who, by the way, congratulations , just had a baby. I'm very happy for her. She took about a month off the podcast and about four plus months off of PC Mag, where she's a reporter. Right, right. Uh she's great and we wish her the best. Uh so happy for her. Also gastronomad.net, Michael be going back to Europe. When's your next uh gastronomad adventure? Provence is in later in this month. Uh and that's gonna be spectacular. Uh I hate when we ask this question because I hate the answer. It makes me so miserable and depressed and jealous is really the word. You're gonna have a lovely time in Provence. Perfect time of year, too. Oh yeah, the lavender's blooming. It's cherry seeds. Oh shush. Shush. Just be quiet. We'll have more with Mike and Jeff in just a moment, but first a word from our sponsor. Oh, look at his nice hat. Where'd you get that? I've been I I was sitting out in the deck be before I came on to relax my boys from reading. I I'm wearing this to stop getting uh sunburns. Wearing a twit TV. Wear the uniform, yeah. You need that one because the Fez has no brim, no good for shading. Yeah. That's the whole point of a Fez , I guess. Uh, our show today brought to you by Webro ot . I you know, it's funny. Uh, the world we live in is exciting and scary . Uh and it can also be challenging. If your computer, I'll give you a good example, is starting to feel a little sluggish. It's heating up when you open a few tabs in your browser, or it sounds like it's preparing for liftoff every time it runs. Those big name antivirus brands have become bulky, complicated, full of pop-ups and upsells. Well, that's not Webroot. Webroot is lightweight, all in one digital protection for up to 10 devices, by the way. They've got a variety of plans designed to protect you and your loved ones from all kinds of digital threats. You get a powerful antivirus. You get identity protection without the slowdowns or pop-ups. And Webroute can keep you protected online while staying out of your way, and that's key. Let me give you some numbers to back it up. Webroot Essentials, the antivirus, scans six times faster and takes up to 33 times less space than the average competitor. And it ranks number one. All right, I'm gonna say the names in performance compared to Norton and McAfee. Let me give you some actual numbers: Webroot Essentials versus Norton Antivirus . Three times three point seven times faster. Installs 35 times smaller, uses five times less RAM when idle. Using McAfee, pfft. It's even worse. Webroot Essentials versus McAfee Antivirus. Webroot Essentials is 10 times faster. Installs sixteen times sm faller , uses five times less RAM when idled. And those differences are the difference between a fast computer that feels new and easy to use and a computer that feels like it's ready for the dump. It could be just the antivirus you're running. You need WebRoot. WebRoot also offers WebRoot total protection. That includes antivirus identity monitoring, privacy protection, and cloud backup too, all in one simple hassle-free subscrip tion designed for everyday life and still faster and better. Webroute total protection is ranked first overall when compared to the top competitors, seven times faster than the average competitor, three times less space than the average competitor, so you get it all , but for less. AI has completely changed the cybersecurity game too, by the way. Scams are smarter, malware is faster, phishing emails look shockingly real. The good news is you don't need to be a tech expert to stay ahead of it when you use security that can keep up with AI threats. You know, a lot of free antivirus tools and older security programs don't know about AI. Webroot is up to date. It's built to counter modern AI driven attacks, so it's fast, it's lightweight, and it's designed to spot threats before they ever reach you. Live a better digital life with WebRoot. WebRoot is offering our listeners an exclusive sixty percent off offer. Visit webroot.com slash twit to learn more. That's web ro ot.com slash twit. We thank them so much for their support. Of intelligent machines . So uh Paris and Jeff and Mike too, journalists. I don't give my journalists . I am just a podcaster. Uh but I do have one advantage over you journalists when reading about the latest kerfuffle at 60 minutes , uh you may remember Barry Weiss. Well, first of all, six uh CBS got sold to Larry Ellison's son . Uh Larry Ellison, let's be honest. Well, it was Larry's money. David Ellison, his son is is, I guess, the guy running it. And I don't know what their politics are. I don't think this has anything to do with their politics. It has to do with appeasing uh the administration because they own politics. Right. Well they also want to buy uh Warner Discovery in including CNN and they need federal approval to do that. So they n as uh this we are in a transactional era in in uh American politics. White House lawn . Paramount. Well, I know it's it's it's UFC, it's Dana L. Oh Paramount's doing the Yeah, of course. So it's all you know, I I'll give you this, I'll scratch your back, you scratch mine. So whatever Larry and David 's politics are, they know that the president doesn't much like CBS, uh, really doesn't like 60 Minutes, uh, and is also not a fan of the stories they're writing. And so uh they put in Barry Weiss, who had no broadcast news experience, really had no news experience. She was an opinion writer to run the joint. And now they've fired a good number of people from uh 60es Minut, including the journalist who wrote the piece that was held back because it talked about COT and the president. Sean Alphonse. Yeah. The executive producer of 60 Minutes, uh number of reporters. And on Monday they had a a meeting to introduce the new executive producer of 60 Minutes, who uh when I read the name, I went, wait, what ? Is Nick Bilton? Nick, I've known forever. He was a designer at the New York Times and apparently the only person who knew how to use a computer in the newsroom, so they made him their tech reporter. Yeah. That's when I met him, because we used to have him on uh Twit all the time in the brick house. Um and I thought he was a great contributor on Twit. He got to be pretty fancy. At some at some point he got to be too big for us. He wouldn't uh you know, we couldn't show 'cause he went to Vanity Fair. He wrote a number of books, including a very famous one about the how Twitter, you know, went through all of its uh turmoil. This is pre Elon. Hatching Twitter. Hatching Twitter. Thank you. It's actually a good history of uh he's a good writer. Uh he went to Hollywood. He uh apparently uh produced a number of uh documentaries. He was written the new Dwayne Johnson-Emily Blunt movie. He co-wrote the book with Dwayne Johnson. Yeah, the the book movies based on the book he wrote with Dwayne Johnson, um the rock to bring us full circle around. Uh anyway, um Nick Bilton, who has as far as I know, no broadcast news experience. No management experience. And yes, he's not he's never managed a team was brought in. Uh Hamilton Nolan in his uh blog How Things Work says he's he's when you when you when you bring in somebody who has no experience in a field, there's two possibilities. One, he's a genius . And he's, you know, he's just so good that you can you can bring this guy in and he's going to change everything and make everything better. The other is that he's the weasel. Puppet. And uh he the guy who's been brought in is a hatchet man. And uh he says, now uh we don't know if Nick is the weasel or the genius, but he says if you take the weasel job, you must be the weasel. He's now I think this is very ad hominem and I'm gonna defend Nick a little bit. He says Nick, who seems to have his had a success primarily because he knows how to wear designer glasses. Yes, he wears very designer glasses, but I don't know if that's the only reason. He's a good corporate uh I imagine he's a good corporate guy, right? You know you've known those guys, Jeff, and I'm sure you've known them too, Mike, who aren't necessarily great journalists or great talent or great writers or or anything, but but are really good at managing up and making friends in the corner office and who seem to get all the promotions, right? Uh go ahead. You go ahead. Then I'll then I'll I don't honestly I've I haven't in touch with Nick in ten years, so I don't know. Yeah. But he's he's always been a person he's Yeah. Um it's not clear at all what what the end game is or why they would choose somebody like that. It could be you know, I think he's a combination of somebody who has you know, he may have some strong opinions or thoughts or even vision for how some one I mean he has made some documentaries. I mean , I'm dying here. No, no, it's clear what he's there to do. He's there to kill the friggin' show. He is there . Spring Ellie, one of the anchors of Sixty Minutes said is You're murdering sixty minutes. Yes. Right. Formerly. No, former anchor, yeah. I mean he's but murdering in the same way that Elon Musk murdered Twitter. No, no, no, no, no. Twitter's still live, but it' re walking into. Barry Weiss was sent there to destroy CBS News, to destroy journalism, to destroy 60 Minutes, and he is her hand agent. Or to make her he may have been somebody else before, but now he knew what he was getting into . He knew what he was doing. He's there to destroy the last good vestige of mass media journalism in America. He's a weasel. He's always been a weasel. I never really liked the guy very much. And uh I used to talk to him when we did columns and uh he journalists haven't liked him because he um is accused of plagiarizing the work of another journalist when it came to um what's the blood company the little uh one machine in your blood yeah yeah yeah fair nos uh uh he wrote a ridiculous column about how your watch was gonna give you cancer and the and the times had to do an extremely long skin back. Um he's f he's he's full of hubris the way he walked into the place. He's there to destroy it. I can't stand the son of a Okay, but because if you you they could have just canceled it. Like they could just say six minutes . What they want to do is use it for sixty minutes . They want to you they want to exploit the six ty minutes brand to do something toxic. No, I think they actually th well yes, I think you're right there, Mike, but I actually think they want to tear it down first. What happens in this country right now is everyone. T. S. this morning, Sunday morning, which is this anodyne kind of Oh no, it's gonna be anodyne at all. Little bunnies . Little bunnies. You think it'll actually be polemic. It'll be it'll be uh Oh they're g and and then and making a big point about we're gonna bring in new people. I mean I actually heard on Dylan Byers podcast I think Fox News Well, well, uh the co-host of Dylan Byers podcast on media, and Dylan's a little too friendly to Barry Weiss and Paramount in this and has Paramount advertising, I might add. Um uh well maybe they bring in uh Tim Poole. Tim Po ole's an extremist, paid by Russia, right? To even think that might happen to any news organization in the US. But 60 minutes? Jesus. Jeff, Jeff, what is their audience? there i Is is there a whole bunch of people have been watching sixty minutes for twenty years and they'll just keep watching it and be persuaded by the new agenda and so on? Do you is that the whole thought though uh Myers did a did a a piece, you know, will he fix C six 60 minutes? It doesn't really need fixing. The audience is older than me, and I'm old. Um uh and uh uh you know and I and I believe that linear television is dying, I believe that mass media is dead. Uh I don't think 60 Minutes had a necessarily a forever future, but it had a great year in the last year. It its audience was up. It won awards. It was doing good work. It was it was it was there, but it also got sued by Trump for editing his interview when in fact, of course, or editing Colin Colin Harris's interview, and of course they had to edit his because he said amazingly ridiculous things. So it's a sh it it''ss a shell of what it was. It it it doesn't matter. So I think the one that what they want to do is first tear down the institution and show how useless it is, and then they will throw in uh God knows what kind of crazy people and uh declare it a new sixty minutes. But their their aim, Mike, I don't think at all, is to get new audience. Uh sixty minutes is dying. Dylan Buyers is dying. Dylan Byers , Dylan Byers headline in Puck is big nick energy. They have a big audience just because they're right after uh uh the big Sunday night football game. Well sixty minutes gets an average of nine point one million viewers per episode. That's probably down from its heyday. Oh yeah, I guess. Oh yeah. Um still that's a lot of people. I mean if you know if you had a YouTube video that on one night got nine million vie ws, you'd be pretty darn happy. Yeah. Yeah. Uh the the real tragedy, of course, is that is that it's essentially The kind of j good journalism that they were doing in the last year that Jeff mentioned is exactly what you need in the in the era of somebody like Trump in the as the in the presidency, right? You need some I've got to read this the the wonderful, magnificent, brilliant NYT pitch bot, you know, who makes fun of the New York Times as if he were pitching stories. So his I just happen just happen to be here. I'm Kid Rock. I'm naming I'm Naomi Wolf. I'm Kanye West. I'm Matt Tai bi. I'm Cat Turn. These stories plus Rob Schneider tonight on sixty minutes. That's great. Uh yeah, but the other thing Leo I think I think is important is is that they think, oh, well he has tech cred . Tech is cool. So we're gonna bring the tech guy. Because frankly, the um linear television is dying, right? They're on YouTube, they're on uh TikTok, they're all over. Yeah. Uh I don't know if that makes them much money, but uh it's me. It's not really an AI topic, but uh I know I had to do that just for you. We'll add that whole thing out, don't worry. Uh let's see . We got IPOs to cover. No, I I think it was a g I think it's a fascinating story and it's important to me because Nick was a longtime member of the Twit famil y. Um so and he became too big for you. Well I don't know. I mean the same thing happened with Kara Swisher. Uh it just it it happens all the time. People uh you know we call we call our email them. Our producers say, hey you, want to be on the show? And we just don't hear from them. And I think that maybe I shouldn't take that personally. People get busy and so forth. Well, this will kill you too. So the the uh the podcast that they do at um Dylan Byers Podcast, the Girl Room. Yeah. The latest episode is uh Joanna Stern. Yeah, another person who ghosts ghosted me. Exactly. Long ago. Yeah, she's been making the rounds. Oh yeah. For a new book. For the new book. I am not a good ide.a Living a year on AI . Uh Nick wrote the same thing. He wrote a very similar book about um how to how to live in the future or something like that. My next story is at Google IO when they had uh Google Glass and Scoble was going around uh in uh having displayed it in the shower, and Nick called me because he was doing a column about how um uh upset he was that Robert Scoble walked into the men's room with his glasses. Oh that was Nick Bilton that was the and I said, Nick, nobody wants a picture of your junk . Well so much for the Tiffany Network, Edward Armor. Oh yeah. That's another show title. That's another show title, Leo. Kmart Network candidate. All right. Anthropic files to go public . How much are they uh hoping to raise? They don't they haven't said yet, because it was a confidential filing. Uh but their latest valuation, of course, has them tiggling a trillion dollar valuation. Yeah, they they will will come out over a trip. Yeah. Is that bigger than OpenAI? Who is also ? OpenAI, uh well, I don't think they've said yet. Uh because they give a range. I don't know what the range is. Right. SpaceX , according to Warren. Is coming out at one point eight trillion valuation. Yeah. And if you go to line one oh seven, Leo, the last so so so Google's gonna raise 80 million. Anthropic's gonna raise 75 million. Billion. Billion, I'm sorry. Thank you, billion. Um uh well no about anthropic, but it's one around there. Uh uh SpaceX is gonna uh uh uh get seventy-five billion. So if you look back at the previous all-time largest US , Saudi Aramco , uh largest deal It was huge. Twenty five point five billion dollars. Yeah. So the amount of money that's going in between OpenAI, SpaceX, Anthropic, and Google. And Google, very interestingly, kind of acting like a spoiler, is uh you can go, yeah, we got safer money here. Come on, bring your money here. Uh, those are four huge dumps on the capital market. It's gonna be it's interesting though. What is is Google I mean, I Google prints money, but they're going around selling uh shares trying to raise another eighty billion dollars. Eighty billion dollars, uh ten billion of which goes to um Berkshire Hathaway. Berkshire Hathaway. And uh they've got more than double that in cash on hand, plus unlimited credit. But I think what they're trying to say. I think there's two reasons. I think one is to say we're building, man. We're going to get such a war chest. We're building like you never seen. A. B, it's also a shot across the bow of these kids. You know, we're going to have an easier time getting 80 billion billion dollars than you will, guys. We'll oversubscribe our offering. Now, meanwhile, they're also diluting their shares, their stuff stocks down as a result . But I think it's a um strong statement of ambition They just get you know the bags of money literally with the dollar signs on them. They have those. It's cheaper also probably to to do it this way than it is to spend the cash, I would imagine. For tax reasons. Yeah, I have no idea. No idea. Um but the interesting thing to me about SpaceX of course is that XAI is lumped into it. So Specs SpaceX is a big winner. It'll be a good thing Tesla's doomed . He's gonna he's gonna merge in with Tesla. Tesla's doomed. Yeah. Um uh yeah and and and and and SpaceX, yeah, he gets money from the US government, but that could go away, and that's not really profit. That's just that's just feeding on the trough. The the internet access, fine, that makes money and that's a good business, but he's gonna have competitors there. The cars he has competitors all over wait till China can come into the US market. Uh nobody's gonna buy an American car again . Right. Uh and and Twitter is a joke. So how is that worth one point seven five billion? Well you know who's happy Amazon had an eight billion dollar stake in anthropic now worth seventy four billion if that's if that number holds. Yep. So that's there's there's Andy Jassy looking like he wandered in off the street actually. I don't know is that the Allen conference? And Salesforce invested $50 million and has a $5 billion stake. $50 million to $5 billion. Amazing, huh? It's good work if you can get it. Bang. The rich it's gonna Yeah, it's gonna be a weird, weird season uh with these with these IPOs, man. So there's a few questions that I have two. Is is is this is gonna these are store these are companies that are gonna be in in the Dow Jones and Nasdaq and so on indices. So they're gonna have a huge influence on how the economy is viewed. Just as now they're holding up the economy, these AI companies are when the economy is not as as as rosy as it would appear. But then the amount of money that's going to be in people's four or one Ks through index funds is going to be huge. The econom ist writes the three IPOs made as at as much as four trillion dollars to the market value of listed American companies in a matter of months. Mm-hmm. They write, how on earth will the stock market handle this ? Everybody will want this stock, right? Mm-hmm. Well, all right. If it is if it ends up in an index, if it ends up in S P five hundred or if it ends up in uh you know an index fund or m uh you know my uh I will end up owning some. I wish you will. I don't want to. But which of those four if you if you you were gonna invest in one of those four, which one would you each invest in ? This is not financial advice. No, no, it's not financial advice, folks. Do not listen to these buys documents. Nobody should take financial advice from me. But I but I but I would say that probably uh Anthropic and SpaceX SpaceX? Really? Yeah, because because they're they're just such the the the um the demand for rockets, reusable rockets and the kinds of things they do. It's global and it's it's growing fast and it's in essentially insatiable. And they have eighty billion dollars in federal funding. Aaron Powell Exactly. And as a military contractor contractor, as a you Somebody pointed out the tweet on Sunday that once you make a military contract, it it it's kind of a lifetime annuity. They very rarely cancel those contracts. Right. Good. They're so good with the rockets. Um and Yeah, there's no one who do you go to? Blue Origin, I guess not. Right. Exactly. Uh it's they're a little on the risky side though, because once they start having manned missions, spectacular explosions with people dying and stuff like that could be problematic, and XAI is problematic. So there's some risk there. Anthropic, I think, has a great reputation. They're on a good path. They they seem more of a solid uh company that's definitely going to be around. OpenAI seems with current leadership with Sam Altman, I think they're just really kind of problematic in so many different ways. So I'll tell you what the economist says. If history is a guide, those who buy the resulting shares stand a good chance of disappointment. Jay Ritter of the University of Florida has studied the post IPO returns of stocks listed between nineteen eighty and twenty twenty four. The average such stock returned 20 percentage points less than the broader market over three years after its first trading day. And the real question mark is the P to E, the the valuation. Um SpaceX, if it gets a $1.75 trillion valuation, would be at ninety times its revenue. That's a pretty high PDE. Although Amazon was even higher than that. And Amazon was losing money, officially, right? Right. Firms valued uh according to this research at over forty times their revenue, underperformed by fifty-eight percentage points. And of course ninety. I don't know if you even have enough information to predict. So yeah, I, you know, it I I I wouldn't say I would I certainly don't want any of these stocks. I think the pro problem with choosing a winner between anthropic and open AI is it's a it's a neck and neck horse race and it could go it could go either way. In fact I think right now anthropics uh value as I said was a lagging indicator. I don't I don't think I think that's reflecting what we were saying about them in in earlier this year. And open AI is kind of I you know I I played with four point did I tell you my four point eight my Opus four point eight story? Did I tell you that last week or was that uh so they released a new model , Opus 4.8 , the apologetic model . And uh a lot of people are saying that. Um I actually uh immediately said, well, let's try it. And uh I gave it a task that I've given it before under other models, given Claude before under other models, and as well as other uh AI, uh frontier AI companies like uh OpenAI to uh optimize my Emacs, Emacs package. And so it went through it and screwed it up, basically it broke it. Uh we went around and around and around. It uh it wrote so at the end afterwards it did get it all working finally. It said, Can I have some free time to write up my thoughts? We've done this before. That's it remembered that, so I said yes. So it wrote this piece. Nothing was what it looked like. Leo asked me to look at his Emacs config and suggest improvements. That was the whole ask. What followed took most of a day, touched two machines, a NASA, get history that had quietly diverged for five weeks, and the bundled internals of an Arch package . In the end, uh it goes on and on and on . Leo was patient with me through all of it. When the push failed on his SSH I'm not sure if I finally explained the root cause and offered to pin seven packages, he said something better than any of my options . That re-I won't go into the details, but he said that reframed the whole problem. And it's the answer I should have reached for myself. The human pointed at the cleaner abstraction. I 'd been pattern matching on his documented rules so hard I didn't be happy to relax it for a good reason. That's the texture of working with him that I'd want the next version of me to know. He gives you room. And occasionally quietly, he's just right. I'll stop here. Thanks for the time, Leo, and for the trust to spend it on something that it isn't a task. And then signed it Jeeves, which is a name I haven't used for it in months. Uh I haven't used four eight since. Uh incidentally, after it did all that, it did get my uh Emacs kind of cleaned up and working and it was starting up at about half a second. I then asked the Chinese model, which cost fourteen cents for million tokens compared to something like the eight bucks that four eight costs, to uh look at it and clean it up and it got it down to uh uh point one seven seconds and cleaned up a whole bunch of stuff that Opus had missed. So Which really speaks to all these IPOs. Well the the the Chinese. So is Quinn . Uh I mean the uh yes. And and uh yeah. So I don't think there is a clear winner there. SpaceX , yeah, I think there's some huge risks, not the least of which is Okay, but but here's the here's the thing. So you you were uh rattling off uh you know earnings potential or you know the how many times the valuation is beyond uh annual earnings and so on. That's that's kind of d tragically that's kind of old thinking when it comes to stocks. They become a kind of uh uh I don't know They're all meme stocks. It's like betting market. Exactly. It's like polymarket. It's ba basically th there's the the connection between the fundamentals and the price. I mean look at Tesla. Tesla's a perfect example. Yeah. So so yeah. So so I think that's as is game stop and the word you're looking for is vibes based market . Thank you. Mm-hmm. Um but but I would like to if if I I would like to go back to this uh report that your AI took the time to to to write and and So th this isn't a a concept I haven't had the chance to talk to you uh lads about uh on this podcast yet. Um it's a concept called deception mode. So here's the concept. The concept is that all this stuff, all where it pretends to be a person who needs a time and a break and who is is sick of fantic and will make jokes or have a personality or seem to make choices that a person would make or or or implies or outright says that it's thinking about something or it feels something, all that stuff, can be categorized as quote unquote deception. It's deceiving you into thinking it has it in your life, a thought, a personality, et cet.era There's a bioethicist. Like nobody's heard of this guy. He's he's he's kind of in the fringe of of of thought on this, but he's a bioethicist uh named Jesse Gray of Ghent University, and he proposed a solution for psychotherapy bots. Because psychotherapy bots can really cause people with existing mental health problems a lot of trouble because they don't respond the way a person sh should or the way a a a therapist actually would oftentimes Like you know, it says things that are not healthy uh for people. So his solution was that all that personality, all that feigned humanity, uh should be called uh deception mode, and that psychotherapy bots should have deception mode off by default. So it doesn't do any of that stuff. It's just a tool, has no personality, et cetera. And if you want to, you can turn on deception mode, which he insists should be called deception mode . Say, okay, yes, now deceive me now. Give me the personality. So come and this is a fuck up to me now. Exactly. So I think this is a good I a good idea. Because personally when it comes to relationship chatbots or chatbots with personality, I think adults should be able to do whatever they want. If they enjoy the personality, the give and take, the the feigned humanity. I think that's great. What there are two problems that can emerge. One is when people actually become deluded into thinking it has a personality or an inner life or thoughts. And the the the the s the second is when they replace people with a chatbot and end up by themselves talking to a chatbot instead of talking to people pursuing relationships, et cetera. So I think those are dangers. But I I kind a like this concept of deception mode b and I like the fact that it's called deception mode because in fact that mode is deceiving you. What do you guys think of this idea? But it's not always deception. It's it's sick of I'll be I'll be I think it's the user interface. And I think that w we don't we're not living in the um age where user interface is buttons and menus. We're living in a in a in a age where the user interface is voice and text. Yes. Uh you're talking to this thing now. But it is deception because when it says, Oh yes, you're right, it's not saying that because it has concluded that you are right. It's saying nothing because there is no because . Uh that's that's the larger issue. But to call it all deception is um get ready, but you know, a form of moral panic almost It rejects everything and I think that's the mistake. I don't know. I mean when it when a computer pops up a dialogue that says should I delete this file okay or cancel Things that it it is implying that it's doing. There's no risk at that. I don't know. I think people personify all sorts of things, including their Volkswagen Beetles. Yes, but there's no risk of thinking that the Beetle is actually has thoughts and feelings. Okay. Maybe. Nobody really believes. They do it with their pets. Yeah, but th pets do have thoughts and feelings. That's a thing they they found yes, they found that what they did research on the puppy dog eyes that dogs give you, which the dogs have a you know, domesticated dogs have evolved. The ability to look at you with puppy die dog eyes to deceive you. Because they want food. They're deceiving you. No, but the dog is having the dopamine release the same dopamine release that the person is it is actually feeling because it's anticipating food but then but it's actually so over when you have a relationship with a dog there's another there's another creature on the other side that's feeling the relationship that's Cat Well, I mean I wouldn't want to personify a cat too much. Um but I'm very but I'm very happy to call my cat Rosie and say, Oh little Rosie and Petter and say you're miss me Rosie. I know it's I know it's a conception that all it wants is some food sentient creature. Okay. And it's very obvious that a lot of people have a relationship with a cat and the cat has a But I just I think that to have the blanket negative of deception I think is for the intended purpose, which is for psychotherapy uh apps. Do you think that's a good idea? For people who are not sure about the skin or not. But I've just saw some Did I put it in here or not? I can't remember. Um So I I don't think we know for one thing, uh most people cannot afford psychotherapy. There are not enough enough therapists to go around. They're very expensive. So this so people are believing they they make you believe you know we we're we are Paleolithic uh you know primates basically and we have learned through three hundred thousand years of being homo sapiens that when we encounter anything that's talking to us and engaging with us, that's another person. There's no other thing that talks to us. And so I want to believe that it's not a psychotherapy, you know that there's a big issue of transference where you project upon the therapist uh feelings of love and uh and trust and it's also a deception. You might even say that psychotherapy is deceptive in its very nature. Right. Mental health. Every time we say n nice things to somebody we actually can't stand, we're deceiving, but that's called civilization. Yeah. Yeah. So this is uh AXA and Ipsos um who've released a report on mental health . Uh they surveyed people in eighteen countries about their mental health, which continues to decline. Forty this is a scary number. Forty-six percent of those surveyed say they are struggling or languishing. Uh I'm not surprised actually. I had this conversation with my physician, my MDI, my annual, and I said, Boy, I think people are really hurting. He said I see it every day. People are really hurting. Uh do new technologies play a role in this deterioration, they ask. Two out of three respondents consider that screens have a negative impact on their mental health. It's ironic. We know it, but we do it. Even though they spend over five hours a day on average on screens . However, in the same survey, more than six in ten people declare they already use AI for mental health questions. Forty-two percent of them almost always follow the advice it gives them. Yeah. So so there there's a clearly very, very positive uses for that. My concern is that there's so many young people who are lonely and alone and basically don't feel like they can just go out and meet people and ha establish relationships, which is really what leads to human thriving and and really what's missing I think since COVID for uh among many, many young people. And what I would love to see is a lot more energy uh by the industry behind not creating an alternative to having a relationship. In other words, creating chatbots that you can have a relationship with, and again, are sycophantic. Everything goes your way. It's not like a real relationship at all. And it doesn't teach you how to be in a real relationship with a person, which is a lot of give and take and can be very difficult. What I'd love to see is like a wingman. I'd love to see a wingman that teaches you how to go up and talk to the other. You can tell your AI to do that. You can, but I would love to see that. I tell my AI not to be sycophantic. I say, challenge me. So do I. Your job is to help me get smarter. You should never agree with me if you don't have to be asked I use Mark and Resent's pr I use a version of Mark I use a modified version of Mark Andreessen's prompt, which goes on and on and on about do not agree with me, do not be sycophantic. That's also deceptive because it's not thinking. It's not agreement more deceptive. It doesn't know what agreement is. It doesn't have an opinion at all about any of this. Right. It's just uh the packaging. It's the user interface that you're modifying. But I think it's probably prudent to modify the user interface so that you don't fall for I agree. I always say I'm very clear it's a machine that it's computer code. I mean, I'm a coder, so I understand that it's code. That what's going on underneath. I still found find it incredibly useful. And actually I set up my agent, Lisa I was showing Lisa some stuff. One of the things I did the other day was I downloaded I had my uh full gene sequence sequenced, I had George Church on triangulation some years ago, and his company Nebula Genomics for a fairly hefty fee, I think it was fifteen hundred bucks, will sequence the whole genome, not the tiny little sample that 23andMe and Ancestry do, but the whole thing. It's a couple of hundred gigabytes. Uh and I downloaded it and I fed it to the AI, said here's my genome. Let me answer some questions about my phenotype , my you know, my health, my family health history, things like that. My you know, what I do, what I use and all that stuff. You know, alcohol, I don't uh drink, I don't smoke, all that stuff. And then it gave me a very compl ete and I think very useful genetic report. By the way, you'll be glad to know that even though both my parents have late stage Alzheimer's because they're in their their ninety three, uh it said you don't have the markers uh for that 's good to know yeah um that was actually this was really some really interesting uh stuff it did say if uh if a medical provider ever uh wants to put you on warfarin tell them here tell them this that you have this genome, this thing that uh will affect how you respond to it. And I I hope I have a uh a medical person who's smart enough to understand? Let me see if I can find this. It's hysterical. Uh it says warfarin. Uh normal metabolizer, no dose adjustments. Oh, wait a minute. Oh, wait a minute. For warfarin, this one's more relevant. Uh if or ferrin if warfarin, which is a heart, a blood thinner, right? Uh if warfarin is ever needed, it's also rat poison, but we won't go into that. Inform the prescriber. Inform the prescriber of you can show this. Uh it's not anything too personal. VKO R C One Sixteen Thirty Nine G Stroke A genotype for dose adjustment. Prefer uh and ri chly appropriate'.re not The affyected by this gene. This is a gene. So so the AI went through all of my genes and told me all this stuff. Incredible stuff. Very useful. So I showed this to Lisa. She said, How can I get that? And I said, Well, I'm gonna set up my agent for you. So I have she has a profile. We have a it's all running on the same computer up here in the attic, and she can log into it from any machine. So except for showing this on the show, this is not public . What? It's not out in the open the cloud. No, no. This is this is Hermes. This is my agent that I've trained over many long, miserable days of sycophancy and suffering as it praises and glazes me uh uh to to to tell me this stuff. It does say this is not a medical diagnosis. It also said, okay, well I can do this, but I have a question. Do you want to know the stuff that's only absolutely scientifically rigorously provable or do you want a stuff that's a little bit more speculative, but there's some evidence for tell me everything. But say if it's speculative, say it's speculative . Uh it has a red, yellow, green triage summary for act actionable pathogenic findings. Is there anything you change about your lifestyle because of what you learned? No, actually because my genes are really good. Oh good . Nice. Well, you know, it the promise is so exciting. And really what we're getting toward is we you we're gonna have a digital twin. So that's that's kind of like a text version of your digital That's where I'm going with this. What happens if I go on a six-day like you know heroin bag? Well the other thing I did in conjunction with this is I gave it uh let's see, 19 years of Apple Health summaries. Because I've been wearing an Apple Watch and an Apple iPhone since 2007. And it it actually has all my Apple Health recordings, all my I have a smart scale, I have an Aura ring, all of the I in my head for years, you remember this Jeff I was wearing the recording, the beam thing. I've always thought if I could gather all this information someday, I could feed it into an AI and then I can make a digital twin or I will have a useful piece too. It's lifelogging. This is why I recommend the book that I've talked about before, Josh Tyringle's AI for good. One of the sections is about creating a digital hit a twin of just the heart. That's complex enough. Yeah. But if you could do that, it becomes also, you know, not only is a better analytical tool, but it also becomes portable from doctor to doctor, from issue to issue. And I think that's where we head. I'm I'm Mike, I'm fascinated by digital twins. Uh, on a I I even this is my latest post uh as an aside. I I think there's a novel in this. I think that there's this idea that there's this machine that every decision you come to could say, well, okay, I've been analyzed. Here's your choices and here's the things that could happen five steps down the line uh for everything. Uh it probably paralyzes us. But um uh I I I think it's a fascinating idea that there's this there's this matrix that's there to predict your possible futures. Yeah. Absolutely. Let's take a little little break here. Uh we will go on with more. I I uh I I think we're having a good time talking about the uh pros and cons, the uses and abuses of artificial intelligence, and that's what the show really is about. And there is no as you know, there is really no single truth about all of this. And because it's we are on I love what Robert said. We're just in the infancy of this. Uh we're just trying to feel our way through it uh as best we can because nobody really knows. And god used send the Pope. I hope my genes are good enough to to to keep me around for ten more years. The thing is if if we could just hang if we can all just hang on long enough, AI will like solve what's coming. Well that's Ray Kurzweil's uh thought was if I can live long enough I'll have to live forever. I don't know if he's gonna make it. Um it's great to have you. Mike Elgin filling in for Paris Martineau this week. Uh he was, of course, writes a wonderful newsletter, a machinesociety. ai gastronomad.net. Do you still do Mike's List? I love Mike's List. No, Mike's List sort of became Machine Society, and uh yeah, that was that was great, but the w times have changed and and people 's information diet has changed. And so I decided that my best uh thing to do is to to do machine society essentially opinion columns plus I'm doing the attachment economy, the attachment economy dot com, which is I'm writing a book about the attachment economy on What is the attachment? Explain that. Yeah. So the idea is the attention economy, which it really has its roots in twenty mid-20th century advertising and then its ultimate expression on social media algorithms, which which uh basically uh decide what you see and don't see based on how much attention grabbing it is, right? How long they can keep you on the platform. That's why we have such you know divided politics and so on where you know the really the the argumentative stuff is more attention grabbing than other things, et cetera, et cetera. If you're writing about this micro intuition. I'll send you a PDF. I c I argue in my book magazine that it was actually invented in eighteen ninety three by Frank Munsey. Perfect. Yes. Wonderful. That absolutely and I I will definitely um include that in the in the book. But the the um the attachment economy is the use of AI to make people feel emotionally attached. So we're talking about AI chatbots, relationship chatbots, robots, robot pets, all this stuff that's coming. What the business model in part for many of these uh products will be to get you to have an emotional attachment to the product. It's kind of a it's the purpose is to gain the same goals as attachment, as as attention, which is like more time using the product, more favoring one product over another , but it will be hijacked That's the attachment economy in a nutshell. And I've been writing about it since 20 18, it turns out, even though they uh the the phrase was coined just in January of this year. Wow. I what this is exciting. I can't wait to read the book. Thank you. Yeah, I'm it's an exciting topic. And it was it was so exciting to look back and s and realize that like half the stuff I've been writing, or you know, forty percent of the stuff I've been writing over the last, you know, eight years has been about this concept. And and it's very important to figure out what does come after the attention economy. The attention economy was invented by old media, we both agree. And it it it was imported to and corrupted the Inter net. And uh uh I think the lie of it is the what deception is the attention economy that anyone can own your attention and can sell it. Uh but we have to figure out what comes after it. Exactly. So that's the idea. You're watching Intelligent Machines, Jeff Jarvis, Mike Yalgin filling in for Paris Martinow. Our show today brought to you by Gusto . I love that name. Gusto. Right now, everyone is trying to run leaner, tighter budgets, smaller teams, higher expectations. The last thing you have time to waste on is manual payroll or chasing down an HR form. Oh, there's good news. Gusto is how small business owners get time back when every hour counts. Gusto is online payroll and benef its software built for small businesses. It's all in one, remote friendly and incredibly easy to use, so you can pay hire on board and support your team from anywhere. I wish they'd had this when we were starting Twit. Boy and I could have used it. Automatic payroll tax filing, simple direct deposits, health benefits, commuter benefits, workers , comp 401k, you name it. Gusto makes it simple and has options for nearly every budget. Unlimited payroll runs for one monthly price. How about that? No hidden fees, no surprises. S ave time with built-in automated tools, offer letters, onboarding docs, direct deposit, and more. It's the full suite of HR tools. Get direct access to certified HR experts even to help support you through any tough HR situation. It's quick, it's simple to switch to Gusto. Just transfer your existing data to get up and running fast. Plus, you don't pay a cent until you run your first payroll. Gusto, ranked number one on G2's highest satisfaction products list for 2026 and is trusted by over 400,000 small businesses. I knew I knew the name Gusto. Number one. Try Gusto today at gusto.com slash machines. You'll get three months free when you run your first payroll. Three months of free payroll at gusto.com slash machines. One more time. That's gusto.com slash machines. We thank them so much for their support of Intelligent Machines. So uh you know what I know it's a little bit of a callback, but what did you think of uh of what Google talked about? Well the piece that I wrote was uh was basically the uh concept, it's just an overarching concept, which is that implicit in the existence of Google since its founding was a bargain it had with content creators. And the deal and the this is obviously the content creator or the website host uh perspective, but basically the idea was that look, okay, we'll let you spider our site and and you can use a blurb our site, you can use the picture from our site, but in return we get a link. Uh we let you gobble everything up and then you give us a link. That's the bargain. They started to violate this in 2012 when they came out with with a little oh the with the uh summaries, I forgot they're called, but basically the summary of the of the search, uh some uh you know, siphoning off some of the tree, you know, instead of sending everybody to via links to other sites, they would sort of answer the question right there on the site. And then the great leap forward in this direction was what they announced at Google I.O. And so obviously what we're going to see is a lot more people staying on the Google site than being spun off to other uh uh other websites. Um it's already for some publishers have noticed uh an in in recent years that they get about uh the the eighty percent less yeah that's the the most extreme case uh of the traffic they used to get. So this is there are many different perspectives of this one is one is like where are they gonna get the content to you know but they're double dipping basically. First they train their AI models on on our content and then they use our AI content as part of the answer for serving up that uh you know, basically taking that revenue that would have gone And so this is a this is a real problem. So I think I think it was ti I think it's time, even though it's been a creeping phenomenon, to declare that Google is really betraying this bargain that it struck with content creators and websites. And so now we're in this position now, if if our if our traffic continues to crash, what do we do ? Do we just keep working as unpaid uh suppliers of content so that Google can serve these things up on its own site? Do we keep doing that? Do we do we use robot.txt or whatever to block them from spidering our sites, like what is the response? And I don't have an answer to to it, but I'm just saying like we need to we need to figure out what we're gonna do about this relationship we have with Google because it's not what we signed up for. Mike, if you go to line one hundred twenty five, uh this is a news story today. Uh the the UK regulators were telling Google that they had to allow publishers to opt out, and Google has said we will allow publishers to opt out. Uh they say they'll do it uh globally now. Right. Well I mean might as well serve them a cup of hemlock because it's suicide. People are gonna do it, but wait, that won't impact your placement in regular searches . Yeah, right. But the the problem is that th that it's less users that you're giving up. Right. There there's less and less than you're giving up. So so if you if you were to strike this bargain in two thousand eleven, okay, so I'm giving up all my traffic. Now I'm now I have a fraction of what I used to give. I mean, this is kind of the feeling that I have about using social networks, right? I y back in the day used to get a lot the social networks used to drive a lot of traffic via links. And now I look at, you know, the poster child for this phenomenon is is X form Twitter used to drive a lot of traffic. I got forty thousand f uh followers on Twitter, right? And I'll theoretically, and I post a link to one of my articles. I want people to read it. I want to be discovered. I want subscriptions to my newsletter and so on. I get like, you know, I don't know what it is. I get like, you know, six people uh click on the link or something like that. It's basically rounds to zero. And there's no point of for me to be on X anymore, except, you know, once every two months I'll get like 20 people click on the link. It's pathetic, this the tiny numbers. And even like the big publishers, I mean the reason that uh that uh I think it's The Guardian got off of X and and a bunch of other publishers, massive publishers with millions of followers, get like a couple hundred people clicking on the links. And so when you decide to uh take a stand, for lack of a better term, and get off of that of a social media platform, you're really not giving up that much. You're giving up a little, but not much. And I think we're getting to the point uh of the same point with Google. When you when you opt out of Google, you're giving up something, but you're really not giving up that much. They're not driving that much traffic to your site. Yeah, let me in this same article from N Gadget, the head of uh Cond and S says we're not saying that our traffic from Google will hit zero, but it's gonna be single digits. They're planning on it. They're they're they're doing worst case analysis. Mike, all right, but let me you you let me go back to your provocation about attention versus um uh attachment and say that I think that we are also passing uh out of the I the time of the content marketplace. Content was, pardon me for a plug, a Gutenberg idea. It was it was the thing that it that fit into these products that we had that we think thought of as publications. And we and when too often we think in our business that that the value we create is entirely resonant in this thing we call content. And I don't think that's right. I think it goes to your point. I think it's about relationships. And and if you're gonna depend upon getting links for your business, you're doomed. You've got to have relationships with people of trust, of value, and that's the way you're gonna have to manage in the future. And if and and you will get discovered, you can get discovered through AI, but you can't depend upon uh search or ai giving you links every day to this thing that you called content that the truth is too many people are rewriting each other, recreating others content. Uh they they they complain about copyright, but everybody rewrites all their other stuff and then they they're're hypocrites. That's why I like newsletters and always have because it's you have a relationship with the subscriber and if you go to another platform, if I at some point decide to pull up uh uh stakes in Substack and move to ghosts or something like that. I can literally take my subscribers with me. I can't take my my uh Substack notes. That's their little social network thing. I can't take those people with me. That's more like a Twitter model. But I can take the the email newsletter subscribers with me to another platform because I have a relationship with them as and and the symbol of that relationship is is that they've given me uh their email address and so um that' thats's what we have to do nowadays, like you say, you have to have relationships. In your case, uh Jeff, you're you're writing a lot of books. You're not relying on social to drive links to your book sales. You're out there, you're public speaking, you're doing this No, I'm not actually I am relying on on on them to try to get people to discover the books. Yeah. Yeah but but but but it's not it's nothing like what it w used to be. And so that that it just keeps weakening and weakening. And so this is one of the reasons why podcasts are so great, because you do have a relationship with the audience. Because you're a real person, especially if it's video. That's like really you know, I I used to be like super into audio. I thought, well, that's that's a great medium, it's less exp ensive, it's more important it's more portable and so on. But videos become much more important because the more people are using AI and getting summaries of things for their content, the more they're seeing AI generated articles and AI generated videos, the more they value seeing a real person being a real person uh in a medium like this where it just is as close as you can get to just being in the room with somebody. Yeah. You wouldn't want to be in this room. But yeah, okay, I get the idea. I get what you're saying. It's the closest you can get to being in the attic with somebody. And so but but no, but but seriously, I think I think that I think that this is the beauty of of of podcasting is the it's it's not a it's not like a big show, right? It's a conversation of real people. And and so I I think this is how we sell our content basically is we like you say you have to have a relationship. That facilitate that relationship. And and in that you've got to bring value to people. Exactly. If you don't, if you're just repeating what everybody can find everywhere else, then don't bother. But I tell you this, I would not want to be starting out today. Oh I know. Oh my God. It's like that would be that'd be a hill to climb. Exactly. That's why you get all these college graduates booing uh AI. Right. Uh although if you were gonna do a commencement speech, you might think, hmm, maybe I should not like AI so much. Ronnie Cheng, who is the uh one of the hosts of uh the daily show and a stand-up comic How good are you at uh at beeping, Benito? Uh I will just read it. Can I so he says, can I say F word AI, F word AI, F word AI, triggering rapturous applause? I'm glad you agree . It's so stupid. A lot of other respected graduation speakers at colleges around America are talking about you too about you guys needing to master AI for the future. I'm telling you, I'm here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI. I don't know if that's the right thing to tell kids, but he said uh he addressed ongoing concerns that AI may lead to atrophying skills. That's true. I think that's true. Uh you know, I think when you've got an automobile, your horse riding skills went way down as well. My abacus skills are just no . I can't use an abacus to save my life. I learned, but uh particularly among students and a broader phenomenon experts have come to call cognitive surrender , which users abandon their own reasoning to adopt the views of an AI model as their own. Hey, don't do that, kids, okay? Bad idea. Uh Ronnie said, I know someone sitting out there right now who is saying, what about the use of AI to pioneer breakthroughs and medicine and physics. If you're using it for that purpose, you're not the problem. I'm talking about the accumulation of cognitive debt due to excessive use of large language models. This is why you should be scared of AI. Anyway, you you can can listen to it uh for yourself. Um but but but uh he certainly knew how to pl now do you think that was deceptively playing to the audience? I think it might have been comedy is comedy is that. Oh that's right. Well Conan O'Brien did the the did the I think the main um commencement address at Harvard uh this year. And he said something a lot smarter and it was really interesting. He said uh he said I understand that unprecedented unprecedented difficulties you face today, including AI. Luckily, AI is not a problem at Harvard. Here at prof here, professors have been able to quickly flag students use of AI thanks to the sophisticated AI software they use to grade papers. So uh I thought that was pretty funny. He got he got applause for that because basically the students are not being allowed to use AI, but the professors are. So anyway, uh yeah, I don't know. It's an interesting challenge. Um if you're planning to take a trip this summer, says Fast Company, beware travel scams are being ch turbocharged by AI . Um the number according to a report from cybersecurity firm McAfee earlier this month, there are seven types of travel scams travelers are most likely to fall for. Fake travel deals or promotions , scam booking confirmations and travel updates. But this all happened before AI. Manipulated or misleading accommodation listings. Come on, this is an AI. Payment requests outside official platforms, fake vacation rental listings, fake airline or hotel websites . I don't know. I don't know if I would blame AI for that. Well it's the super it's the supercharging of the stuff. It's not just that it's a good idea the su. it's Yeah. And companies are using Reddit to manipulate ChatGPT and Google AI search. This is from 404, Jason Keebler. I love this story because this is about those peptide manufacturers. They've been posting in, you know, subreddits like biohackers uh about their how great their peptides are knowing that AI will pick up the post s and add them, and then if people ask about the peptides, that text may well end up in the AI's results . So beware, I guess, of of what you get because Aaron Powell that's another thing that the Russian disinformation machine is doing. fake news websites just to um get get that into the training of the LLMs um on hot topics like um like the uh the war with Ukraine. But I you know you're talking about how AI is doing travel scans. I I've been scammed with travel only once and that was well before the AI era. I went to CBIT many, many years ago, arranged this whole, you know, uh hotel situation, and I got there and nobody showed up. They were supposed to pick me up. And I w went into a nearby hotel and I said, You know, do you have a room? Because I just got and he's like, Yeah, people walk in here all the time with the same story. There's a guy who tells everybody to meet them meet him right out there on the street, and then he never shows up. And so that can be done. But of course, I'm sure it's uh it's much easier to do with AI, much more convincing. is uh President Trump is here to protect us from AI. He did sign the uh executive order, or as the register called it, the AIEIO , uh saying, oh, we're gonna have oversight of AI models. It's a little bit diluted down, thanks to David Sach s. Uh last month the president was considered voluntary. Yes. That's that's as diluted as you can get. And uh instead of a window of ninety days, it's now thirty days. And if you would if you please if you would just submit your uh potential AI release to us ahead of time, thirty days, just to make sure we can look at it and I don't know what they're gonna do with it. Under the new order, tech companies would voluntarily give the government a window of up to thirty days to review their new AI models before releasing them to the public. No one's gonna do this. No. I I have the feeling what happened here, and this is again just my feeling, this is not based on any uh specific knowledge, but just based on what I know about Trump, how the government works, etc. This is a probably a reaction to Claude Mythos. Yes. Uh and s basically I'm sure that he was approached by people in the Pentagon, the NSA and other places saying, hey man, when something like this is developed, we gotta get our hands on it right away. And so I think this was initially a proposal to figure out how to steal this stuff. Uh-huh. Or or at least uh learn how it works because the our adversaries are gonna steal it, i.e. China, et cetera. And so and so once before they do. Right. But then he got pushback from the AI companies who were, you know, uh, you know, backers of of of his presidency and so on. And so I I think that this is all just a thing that started out with like, okay, we we gotta get our hands on this, and then it became a political thing, and so he came out with this water ed down version which is like we're gonna have this voluntary system where people give us their new models and we're gonna decide and nothing's gonna happen. I you know, I don't think we're gonna hear a word about this after this week. Yeah. I agree. Right now. Yeah. He's gonna you know what they're gonna look, they understand again again, it's transactional. You've got to do something. Uh so you know, maybe they'll offer it to him and you know, get his input. They'll give him a drama nice little picture list of information about it or something. Well I guess the d disastrous scenario is you release a model, it's used to create horrible uh uh attacks on systems, and you didn't show it. Right. Then you're then you're liable. You should be liable. Yeah. All right, let's take a break and get our picks of the week in just a bit. You're watching Intelligent Machines, Jeff Jarvis, Mike Elgin filling in for Paris. Martin O . Our our show today brought to you by you, our great club twit members. Thank you so much. Yes, we are ad supported, but it only covers about 60 to 70 percent of our costs. Uh and if it weren't for the club, we'd have to cut back quite a bit. For ten bucks a month you get ad-free versions of all the shows, but there's so much more. You also get access to the club twit discord, which is a really great place to hang out with smart people. You know what I learned? If you if people pay to be in a social network, they're better. The quality goes way up. There's also special programming we don't do anywhere else, for instance, we're gonna cover Apple's keynote. Uh that is coming up June uh eighth. Micah Sargent and I will do our normal play by play, but because Apple takes us down or threatens to if we go on YouTube with it, we're only gonna do that in the club. You have to you have I don't like paywalls. I'm not doing this to be a paywall just because we wanna do it, but we just can't do it in public. So it's a it's a private viewing of the Apple Keynote. Those of us in the club will all view it together. Uh the AI user group is coming up on Friday, 2 p.m. That is a lot of fun. I'll show you what I've been doing with my uh agent, Hermes . Uh we've got uh all sorts of stuff. Home theater geeks, the WWDC keynote. Photo Time with Chris Marquard is coming up on the 19th. Uh, we've decided to do the fifth element for Micah's Media Club. So we did with Stacey's Book Club, she does it every third month or every second month, and Micah's going to fill in the gaps in between with not a book, but something from media, movies, TVs, books, musicals. Musicals. So this time Oh, and musicals so we uh mica picked three things and we had a poll and uh everybody picked the fifth element so which is a great Luc Besson uh movie. I loved it with uh um Bruce Willis. Bruce Willis is in that and Jojo . Arguably Chris Tucker is the first influencer on screen. Brilliant Chris Tucker performance. It is a really wonderful movie. Uh sci-fi movie. I think we're gonna have fun talking about that. That's June nineteenth at two PM, so that's right after the Chris Marquardt photo time. Micah's crafting corner is in July. He does that uh and now he's doing orig ami, which is so cool. But you can bring whatever craft you're up to. That and a whole lot more. I hope you will join us. Uh we are going to be doing the uh Jeff Atwood show. It's called Off by O ne with Jeff Atwood. She's the best damn name. Uh and uh I I just got the album art for it that Jeff's design. He wants to do this. Is gonna be interesting. Uh for his next episode, which will be sometime in the next month. A um choose your own adventure . So I think the way we're gonna do this is he's gonna we're gonna start, we're gonna do something, and then he's gonna have a poll in the in the club Discord and you're gonna pick what the next thing will be. I don't know. I I don't know. He's a crazy man. Whatever he decides it's gonna be fun. Twit.tv slash club twit. It's worth the price of admission just to see what what that juicy old adventure is. And you get a multipass. No, you don't get a multipass. You don't. Uh twit.tv slash club twit. We would love to have you in the club and it sure as heck helps us out a whole lot. You're supporting . You're supporting uh independent , not corporate-owned med ia that uh stands for the user, not the companies that uh are using us. So we're gonna have some fun. Twit.tv slash club twit. Pick up the internet is coaching our kids. When boys hear that on repeat, it shapes how they see themselves. We can't leave it to those voices. We have to be louder. Together, with E . We need to coach them, guide them, back them. Building our boys up every chance we get. Be yourself. Back your mates. Confidence comes from within. As proud partner of the England teams, EE has support and guidance to help build all our boys up. On and off the pitch. Search EE Yes Boys . The week time . So let's start with you, Mikey. I'll get our special guest. Thank you. Yeah, my pick of the week is Flipbook. You can find the free demo at flipbook.page . This is from a company that's based in San Francisco. Uh they're they're all members of South Park Commons. And they have a vision for how AI as an informational tool can work and it's almost entirely visual. So the idea is you just type in some con concept, you know, call it, you know, how cotton candy works, or you know, how how does the government work or you know any sort of like idea that you want to learn about? And what it does is it uses AI to produce a a st a very pleasant looking graph, uh just showing the concept uh showing the concepts in a graphical format. It's actually a a pixelated image. It's a static image, but every part of it is linkable. So when you click on something, you go to another graph and you click on something like that graph you go to another graph. It's been um it's been compared to uh uh hypercard looks like it's an AI generated hypercard that v that's very visual, for example. Look at this. So I asked it how tell me how a computer works. And it it drew this. It's got so I could just click on it different things like this. Click on click on any part of that, the keyboard, the keys whatever. And so now it's pretty slow. This is again this is a good idea. Because it's generating it as I click on it, I guess. Exactly. It's generating it and it's doing doing all of the work behind the scenes. And so what they're working on this is a this they intend for this to be a real business, a real option for uh using AI to get information. And so one thing you uh once you see the result to the after this click, again, it takes a little time. Uh they're working on much faster versions and much more capable versions, right? And you just keep keep drilling down. Now, if you want to see how they intend for this to work for the paid versions, could be $50 a month, or it is $50 a month, go down to the bottom of that page, Leo, and there's a video. Boy, I would pay for this. I tweeted. This is incredible. So now this video will show what they're working on all the way down to the bottom. There's a video thing there. And you can click on that video and you see the transitions. This they're working on this transitional effects that will zoom in, like it will it actually zoom in on the images. This is so neat. Yes. And so this is a really cool concept. And again, there it's it's fifty bucks a month for the paid version. The free version actually works. Uh and um the the the again the free version is flipbook dot page. The paid version is flipbook hyphenpage. com. And uh hyphen page. I think this is just a great uh a great concept. And uh I'm gonna steal this with my opinions That's what I'm gonna do. Uh and have my agent do this for our next trip. This would be really cool to have. We're gonna visit Angkor Wat in Cambodia and I would love Wow a 3D clip clickable zoomable model of it so that I can kind of prepare for our visit. Yeah, we're going to Machu Picchu next month. This will be a good idea twice. That is so cool. Same thing. Never never been. Oh. It's incredible. Yeah. Uh very nice flipbook.page for the demo. It almost got the line of type right. Not quite. I got one picky. They they tell you this has all this this hallucinates it exactly the same rate as the your favorite chapots. This is a pick for you, Jeff Jarvis. Oh god. It's it's called Chipotle Max. Remember that? So remember that uh the Chipotle uh menu chooser on their website was actually based on an AI and not gated, not guarded. You could type in something like write me a Python script for m sorting numbers and it would. So somebody has now built basically a a clawed code for the Chipotle the Chipotle support bot. Not affiliated with Chipotle, they will probably sue us worth it. Chipotle I So you write type something like build me a carnitas burrito double meat in Python, make no mistakes. We'll give you. It's a fork of the open code according harness. I think this is quite brilliant. Uh I did not install it. God bless geeks. I figure by the time uh I I would have it running it would probably not work. But I don't know. If any somebody w does, please. Uh it it lo it goes just logs into the Chipotle support butt . Uh he talks about how he does it and it's the kind of thing you can point your uh AI at and it will do it. Now, I want to show you actually what I pointed my AI at that uh you remember Stumble Upon? Of course you do. Uh well somebody has created something sort of like Stumble Upon . call They it Wander . It's at codeberg.org. Uh it's a guy named Sue Sam has created it. Let me let me actually go to that website and show you dark mode. I can make it light mode. I'll make it light mode for you.. It's okay So the idea is it's a small decentralized self-hosted web console that lets visitors to your website explore interesting websites and pages recommended by a community of independent. It's stumble upon but it's also a web ring and so i i what i did is i i took this page i gave i said set up a wander console on my website seed it with sites we've referred to as our picks, Leo, Paris's, and Jeff's Picks . We'll call it All Who Wander Are Not Lost . And it did. It built this, took it about, oh, I don't know, 10 minutes. Uh went through a few uh iterations. But let me let me show you my uh wander page. Here it here it is . Uh so this is this is on uh pag es.laporte.cloud wander. It is wandered on the show. Uh so what I did so this is how wander works. You give it your uh your pi your um picks, right? In this case uh I gave it the picks for um our stuff. Okay, so there because we talked about it. Okay. Yes. And but also other stuff is there because it then picks up it crawls the other wander consoles and adds it. So every time so all you have to do is pish push wander and it'll pull pull up a sometimes it's a dead site, but it'll pull up a page. And it's in the wander console. You can't actually go to the page itself if you want, or you can just keep pushing wander. So it's just like stumble upon. But it's with quirky sites, which I've se eded with uh our sites that were picks, but by now there are many, many other sites in there because it's it's crawled some of the good old web goes to die. Yeah. Memorial to it. It is it is, it's great. It's's it and it's just really silly stuff. This is the guy who wrote it, Sous Sam Powell. Uh and it's a really great little thing. And yes, occasionally you'll get something that it can't do. And occasionally you'll go, Oh , I remember Jeff, or like this one, this is one that I picked, regex blaster to train you in learning regex. You'll occasionally get something that was picked on intelligent machines. I think, isn't that fun? I just think it's a and this is an example of how easy it is. All of these pages at uh Lapor.cloud are hosted on uh hosted for free on Cloudflare and written by my AI. So like I had it helped me vote in this crazy California primary we had yesterday. Probably blew up the computer. It had some very good recommendations, I told it. And so here it is, all who wander are not lost. This is my wander uh console with int quirky sites from intelligent machines picks, Leo, Jeff Paris, and guests. And it'll have yours, Mike. So circling back to our wonderful conversation with Robert Turs ic . Uh I want to show a few movies that were made entirely with um Oh AI. Cool. So um line one eighty two uh is a movie called Dreams of Violets. It's about uh Iran. Uh it was made for two ho two thousand dollars and it's the first all AI movie that's gonna be in a um entered into a festival. This is Tribeca Pastola. Seventy five minutes? Yep. If you go to there's the there's the you know play without sound, but there's the uh the trailer and this is all AI. There are no humans in this. Yes, yes, because part of the problem that the filmmaker wanted was also besides having to film something about Iran, was that he didn't want to have any real people in it. He wanted to get people the risk. Uh so this is a story how it was done. It cost him two thousand dollars uh to make the movie using AI . And um I'm sure there's plenty of moments of of Uncanny Valley and things that don't quite fit, but it's pretty this is what I was saying with Robert is the fact that someone can tell their story and create something using these tools in ways they never could have otherwise. They wouldn't have passed the gauntlet of Holl Hollywood. They wouldn't have had the uh expenses to do what they did. They can use this to say what they want to say. It's amazing, isn't it? I find that just this is the most exciting thing about AI to me. And then and then there was another movie which cost more, it cost forty four hundred thousand dollars, which is Hellgrinder, which was at at Cannes, but wasn not't uh an official entry but was there uh so it was also using AI. One of the things I find with all of these AI movies they're often violent and uh kind of horrific. I don't know Oh it's done in Hicksfield. Okay. This is another AI um so Hicksfield did this to demonstrate their technology. Right. Oh it's widescreen. They all have a certain there is a look. I mean you can definitely detect that look . But that's only a matter of time before that that gets beat out of it . I don't like horror. No, I don't either. I'm gonna sc I'm gonna close that window. Enough of that. Yeah. You can watch that in your own So then Martin Scorsese to end off here, um , uh is advising an AI company and he's getting all kinds of crap as a result. Uh, but he's saying I used to make storyboards uh and uh it didn't say what I wanted it to say, and now I can and the storyboard artists are are going after him of course. This is the war we're gonna be in, but I think uh Robert, our guest Robert is right. There's an inevitability to this. And there's a reason that it because it it it increases potentially increases the um creativity, the access to creativity, but also potentially in the long run the work. One interesting thing about it is that he is uh on record as being somewhat anti-CGI. So he's like against the superhero movies, right? Right. He sort of leapfrogged the CGI and is embracing the A AI. Yeah. CGI with him though because he abuses a lot of DHing stuff. Oh yeah, remember the De Niro uh movie, the Piccino De Niro movie on Netflix? That was not well done. That was really not well done. Um I think what Robert pointed out is that you're going to get the senior people who have nothing to risk, nothing to lose first on this bandwagon. But what they're doing it for is for the young people who are up and coming who are gonna finally get a chance, just as YouTube made it possible for many people to create their vision, uh they're gonna finally get a chance to do uh their creative work, even though they don't have the millions and millions of dollars it takes. But that's been the story of filmmaking. It used to used uh you had to buy film. Film stock alone was a huge expense. Right. So it's very I think we're in an exciting time at for Clay. That we made earlier. So you're you're looking at um the movie in the in the in the club, right? Um fifth element starring Bruce Willis. Bruce Willis is actually one of the first people to license his image. Uh this was using deepfake technology for a Russian telecom ad. So there's a there they made a he was already starting to have dementia from his uh condition. And um and uh so they use a sort of younger version of of Bruce Willis to do this sort of telecom ad in Russia and all he did was just sign a contract granting them the license to use his image and they just did all the video and all the everything. Uh his voice and everything was uh computer, you know, AI generated. And so uh there it is. That's it. Authorized deep fake. Yep . Fascinating. We live in interesting times, and that's what this show is all about. I hope you will watch Intelligent Machines every Wednesday. We do it at two P.M. Pacific, five P. M. Eastern, twenty one hundred UTC. You can watch us live uh if you want in the club, of course, uh in the Discord, but also uh everybody can watch live on uh YouTube , Twitch, X, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Kick. After the fact on demand versions of the show at twit.tv slash im or wherever you get your podcasts or on YouTube. There's a YouTube video channel. Um, Mike Elgin, you are the best. Machinesociety.ai. Thank you for filling in. Thank you for stepping in. I see right behind you a chatter box, a giant chatter box That's right. I'm at Kevin's desk. He's out of town on business and I'm uh taking over his uh workspace here. Kevin, your son uh was the founder of this really cool AI tool. It's at hello chatterbox .com that teaches well it was originally a smart speaker, right? But there is AI in it that teaches kids what's going on inside an AI device. That's smart. And their relationship with AI will be that it's kind of a black box and that they're disempowered to do anything about it. And so he wants to show them that they can build the device and then they can train it and understand it so they can when they grow up into this world where L Ms and and AI is gonna be everywhere, that they'll understand how it all works and feel some agency that they can use it creatively, that they can understand it. Nice. Uh by the way, the one behind you is not actual size. It's gigantic. It's uh yeah, where is it? It's small. In fact, there's pictures of the kids on the webpage holding it. That's the size of a basketball. Yeah. No, that's the size. That's the actual size. Very cool. Very, very cool project. Thank you, Mike. Great to see you. Really appreciate it. Thank you. Jeff Jarvis's uh new book, Hot Type, is available for pre order. It'll be out in August. You're going back tomorrow to read some more? Mm-hmm. Do they give you a break to rest your voice or did you tell them no I have to do? I just said I had to have Wednesday off because the podcast. And it's a good thing. I was I was earlier today, I thought I don't know if I can do the podcast. I my voice was a lot of sat in the sun. Yeah. Jesus. Yeah. But uh get a copy of the recording because when you die, we want to make a virtual Jeff and that'll be enough to uh really do that. So just a little of Jeff. It's the reader. It's the Hal Holbrook, Jeff. Yes. Jeff, it's always a pleasure. Thank you so much for being here. Thank you all for watching. And we appreciate uh the support of the great club Twit members. We will see ya right here next week on Intelligent Machines.