PO
Pod Save America
Pod Save America
FISA Section 702 and Intelligence Oversight
From 80-Year-Old Man Loses War — Jun 16, 2026
80-Year-Old Man Loses War — Jun 16, 2026 — starts at 0:00
Pod safe America has brought you by Simply Safe. Summer travel season is officially here which means it's time to pack your bags, double check your itinerary, and panic about whether you remember to lock up your house before you left, or you can arm your SimpliSafe system and head out confidently knowing SimpliSafe has your back. I set up a SimpliSafe as you know, credibly easy to do, customize it to my house, it arrived, set it up, the app, incredibly reliable and great. The customer support was always there and really helpful. So highly recommend it. It gives you peace of mind. With SimpliSave you can customize your system to fit your needs, then it ships fast direct to your door. The app guided setup is simple and there's no drilling required so you can install and arm your system in under an hour. SimpliSave is more than just a security camera. It's a comprehensive system of sensors indo,or and outdo or cameras and twenty four seven professional monitoring. Over five million people value and trust Simply Safe with their home security every day. Right now, our listeners will get fifty percent off a new system. When you sign up for professional monitoring and your first month is free . Just visit Simplesafe. com slash crooked that's half off at simplesafe. com slash crooked. There's no safe like Simply Safe. Hiring isn't just about finding someone willing to take the job. You need the right person with the right background who can move your business forward. If you want candidates who match what you're looking for, trust indeed sponsored jobs. And listeners of the show will get a one hundred pound sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves at indeed dot com slash broadcast. Just go to indeed dot com slash broadcast right now and support the show by saying you heard about indeed on this podcast indeed dot com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring, do it the right way, with indeed . Looking for your next office. Discover Wiworks new real estate platform built for a smarter way to work, with forty five million square feet of office space in one hundred twenty and cities across thirty four countries. We've got you covered. For global coworking to custom office solutions, visit wework dot com Welcome to Place of America. I'm John Fabric. I'm John Love, Tom Dor. On today's show, the US and Iran have signed a memo to end hostilities, allegedly for now. We'll talk about it as well as the implications for Iran's nuclear program, Israel, and our own midterm politics. We'll also dig into Trump's eightieth birthday celebration, which involved the much anticipated White House UFC fight and lots of opportunities for him and his pal ms to make more money. Gavin Newsom just announced that Trump's goons at the Justice Department are investigating his wife in a bid to derail his potential presidential campaign. We'll get into what we know about that. Then Tommy talks to Senator Mark Warner about the Iran situation and what the Senate can do and why he's pushing his colleagues to confirm Trump's new pick for DNI . Before we start, please consider subscribing. If you haven't already, you get ad free episodes of Podsave of America and all your other favorite crooked pods. You also get to know that you're supporting independent pro democracy media . You get full access to our substack newsletters, our subscriber only shows like Poller Coaster with Dan Feiffer and all kinds of other goodies. So check it out crooked. com slash friends, become a friend of the pod subscriber today. All right, let's get to the news. The Iran war appears to be over and Donald Trump has lost. U. S. and Iranian officials have signed a memorandum of understanding, shorthanded as an MOU that extends the ceasefire another sixty days, reopens the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for ending the U. S. naval blockade of Iran , and kicks just about every other issue to the next phase of negotiations , including Iran's nuclear program and economic sanctions relief. Iran has certainly suffered significant casualties and damage in this war, but Trump's war didn't topple the Iranian regime, destroy its military or ballistic missile capabilities, end Iran's support for proxies like Hezbollah or eliminate its nuclear program. By the way, those were all of the objectives that Trump and Marco Rubio laid out way back in February and March when this whole thing started. Other than that, mission accomplished , which seems to be a face saving agreement that lets Trump pretend he won, which he did shortly after arriving in Europe for the G seven on Monday. And these trainers already partially opened, as you know, there' re doing a little hunting for a couple of mines. These ships are starting to go out now on Friday, it'll be completely open . It's not like the Obama document, which was just a terrible document. I think it's going to be free sailing . We do want to see if we can straight down the Lebanon thing . Where were they by, the way, though the least presidential backdrop I've ever seen. I don't know. I assume they're in somewhere in France if he's with Macron, but they're on a porch or somewhere. I don't know where they were. Anyway, the Obama document was terrible and we do want to straighten out Lebanon may,be Lebanon . So the administration says the full text of the MOU won't be released for another day or two . But based on the details that have been reported , how does the deal look beyond the headline summary that I gave. You know the old Mike Myers thing, like, you know, the suit nuts are neither suit nor nuts. Like it's like, this is a replacement nuclear deal. It's not nuclear. We know that, but it's not really even a deal because presumably in a deal, both sides would have to concede something. And I can't figure out what Iran has conceded. I know what the U. S. gave up, right? I know what we're will, you know, there's a massive fund that they could get access to sanctions relief. They make a bunch of cash, they get a ceasefire in Lebanon , which they want to try to constrain. Iran seems to have agreed to the nonproliferation treaty it already agreed to and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which was open a hundred and nine days ago . So this is not a deal. This is the U. S. surrendering in order to reopen the negotiations. It stopped when it bombed Iran. This is a deal to temporarily deal with the fallout from the stupid war we started in hopes of maybe getting a full nuclear deal to accomplish our goals. I mean you laid it out. I mean Trump described his goals. He did a video statement right after they started the war. He said're going, to We destroy their miss iles and raise their missile industry to the ground. We're going to annihilate their navy. We're going to ensure that the region's terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the world then attack our forces. And we will ensure that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapon. I guess we guess the Navy maybe you get one for four there. Yeah, took out your Navy, but they saw the straight off was closed. So that doesn't seem good. So this is hard to message because this was the best deal available to Trump and for the world because it ended the war and we were seeing economies in Asia collapsing. We could see still see a global famine because of what was happening. But Trump accomplished none of his goals. And I think we should we have to message that. And Iran now knows it can shut down the global economy at any time by closing the strait of Hamuz and they could get hundreds of billions of dollars in sanctions relief. Like this is a disaster. And the Trump and Netanyahu , like Netanyahu actively tried regime change by killing the Spreme leader. Trump was for it when it seemed like it might happen. But the net effect is there's now a younger, more hard line supreme leader and a more entrenched IRGC running the show, and the United States looks like we're unreliable and weak . I thought it was very funny that in one of his truths about this , Trump was like, I hereby declare the straight open . And then you look at some of the fine print or at least some of the report ed details . And before the war , the strait was controlled by Noan. It was an international body of water. And now it will be controlled by Iran and Oman together , apparently. And so you don't really hear Trump talking about that, although he is saying it's toll free. It's toll free. Like the calls that we used to make back in the eighties and nineties . Sounds like it might be toll free for sixty days, and then Iran has plans to slap a toll on that shipping. Yeah, they've said that they can charge fees . So that seems to be, even that seems to be in dispute right now. Yeah, also, you know, Trump is saying that it'll be fully open by Friday when the sign when they sign the agreement, but when they were last talking about what the deal would look like . It was going to take thirty days to potentially remove the mines that are in place. And I don't know, if I were an oil tanker, I would definitely want to go after several. Yeah, I wouldn't want to be first. Yes. A lot of like, no, after after you you , Exon. After you. Every restaurant opening gets delayed. You know, like when you do a remodeling takes you out of the bottom get the kids out. You want to be the third or fourth oil team for sure. Maybe fifth or sixth. Can I read you guys one quote from, a this s isenior administr ation official. I'm pretty sure his name rhymes with Haidi Prance . One of the really cool things and interesting things about this entire process that we actually have a direct relationship with a number of people at the highest levels of the Iranian govern ment . You know, you could have just called them and not killed like their whole family. So the war the war was literally the friends we made along the way. That's what we learned. It's like, hey man , I know it's hard to make adult friends JD Bans. The male loneliness crisis unbelievable with the Iran war. Where's the there's some back and forth on the sanctions relief too. So it's like first it was we heard some reports that there'd be twelve billion in sanctions relief right away with another twenty four billion coming later depending on what Iran does. And then Iran's asking for like a pot of three hundred billion dollars that they might be able to access down the road. Now it seems like there's no sanctions relief right away , but it's also like where was the money coming? This is like would be unfrozen assets, right? Yeah, there's a bunch of unfrozen like a bunch of frozen money that is the Iranians money sitting in banks in Qatar, for example. And then there's all this talk of like up to a three hundred billion dollars investment fund that will come from Gulf countries. I mean, the truth is no one knows Iran's real money is going to come from slapping fees on ships that go through the Strait of Hormuz going forward and sanctions relief is my guess. Selling all its oil again . Yeah, well they've already claimed that the docu sign is done or however they did it over email . What is release the text if the Iranian if the Iranians have seen it and signed it and we've seen it and signed it, there's no secrets between us. So to me, like I don't I can't think of a reason why Iran wouldn't want the text out there. It seems to me that Vance and Trump are trying to spin this thing until we see the text and everybody loses their fucking minds. Yeah, it seems like maybe there's something about Jeffrey Epstein in the text. Oh yeah. Look at me. He negotiate this thing? There we go. Boy, that would be what a surprise that we try'ing tore connect the conspiracy . Trump was always going to say whatever deal signed was better than Obama's Iran deal. You were saying Tommy this morning that the comparison is apples and oranges . Yeah , elaborate. In c aase in the case of the Alespp, there was a deal that went into force and that worked for a couple years, according to Trump's own top national security aids. In Trump's case, there is no deal. There exists a framework to talk about possibly getting to a deal. And just to remind everybody with a JCPOA said, the preamble of the JCPOA said, quote, Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek, develop or acquire nuclear weapons. So whenever Trump says, look, they say they're not going to get nuclear weapon, that was already enshrined in the JCPOA and also enshrined in another treaty called the NPT. We won't have to bel or that. But to make sure that Iran could not get a nuclear weapon, the JCPOA said Iran had to reduce its enrichment capacity by two thirds. That meant like taking down or shipping out or shuttering out all their centrifuges. They had to cap enrichment at three point six percent purity, three point six seven percent purity. They had to ship out ninety seven percent of their stockpile and allow the IAEA to inspect all of their nuclear sites and then agree to not build a new enrichment facility for up to fifteen years. Republicans were always mad about the sunset provisions in that agreement , but it was working and it worked. And it sounds like Trump is maybe at best going to get a similar deal after launching this disastrous war that he could have gotten if he just tried to renegotiate. Yeah, we need a president without sunset provisions. That's the problem. Yeah . It does seem like now that the bl ockade will be over and the strait is open, like it's not like there's a lot of pressure on Iran to get something out of these negotiations. It's just if they want sanctions relief, which I'm sure they do, then maybe they make a deal, but they've also been going on quite a long time without sanctions relief, so it doesn't seem like there's a forcing mechanism here. Right. So Israeli and U. S. officials are both saying that Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon is not part of the agreement . Iran and Pakistan are saying an end to all military operations in Lebanon is part of the agreement. Trump has also been publicly attacking Netanyahu over the last few days for launching strikes in Lebanon that nearly tanked the deal. He told Axios that BB has, quote, no fucking judgment . So this chapter of the conflict seems unresolved. What do you guys make of the Trump BB dust up and where this goes from here? That was in an interview in which Trump said that Israel launching those strikes delayed the deal from going through . And then after the deal goes through in which Iran and Trump are claiming Israel is bound . Netanyahu says he doesn't see eye to eye to Trump and they retain all their prerogatives to defend Israel from attack. And so I don't understand what is supposed to happen over the next sixty days and how you get to the end of sixty days without Trump threatening further military escalation to get to a deal or Israel threatening military escalation or there being some kind of a fight in Lebanon? Because in his first comments about this, Netanyahu said plainly, we reserve the right to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon. That will continue to be our position regardless of an agreement. Yeah, every time Netanyahu wants to try to blow up talks or prevent a deal, he just bombs somewhere in Beirut. And he tried that move again here and it seems to have pissed Trump off and actually I think probably sped up the deal. I do think it's hard to overstate how negative the reaction to this deal is in Israel right now . I follow this one Israeli political security analyst who was in the IDF for twenty five years, then he ran the head of the Iran branch for Israeli military intelligence at one point. So like pretty hardline guy. He described the deal as a political and security catastrophe for Israel because the nuclear issue is unresolved and the fact that Trump lost the war will likely defer future presidents from taking military action against Iran. What you're just saying there about the lack of stick now for the Iranians . And also it seems like Iran will end up stronger because they will have all these financial incentives and there will never won't really be a credible deterrent anymore because no president is going to want to touch the stove. And so this is a huge hit for Netanyahu himself. He was Mr. Iran, he was Mr Security. He was the guy who could manipulate Washington. Now he's none of those things. He's got an election coming up, and here's what some of his opponents are saying. Avator Lieberman said a catastrophe from Israel's perspect ive. That was one quote. Gayer Lapid the moderate. This is one of the most shocking failures of Israel's foreign and security policy period. So I think I'm also watching whether or not Yo tries to blow this up. I mean, they're currently occupying the Ford operating line for the IDF right now is six miles into Lebanon. They say they're not going to retreat from that, but they're also going to get shot at by Hezbollah. So I just I'm not sure how this is going to go, but he needs to be careful because he needs Trump's help both polit ically and in terms of security support going forward . But also you can imagine from Trump's perspective that he's thinking, okay, I got this whole thing done. If the negotiations over the nuclear program don't really go anywhere. No one at home's really going to care or notice, and I can just move on. Bibi, though , for everything you just said, Tommy , clearly is not done with Lebanon and Hezbollah and is now feeling all kinds of pressure to continue that. I'm sure Trump thinks, well, BB can do whatever he wants now. I'm washing my hands of this. Like I don't I don't have want to deal with it. But Iran knows the best way to get the US back into the conflict and to draw them to draw us back in is to close the strait again. So like you can imagine that like BB goes into Lebanon and then there's another and then Iran fires to help Hezbollah and they go back and forth, and Trump wants to stay out of the whole thing, but Iran, of course, knows that it can get us back into the whole thing just by closing the straight again. And so Trump's dream, I'm sure is like, let these people fight it out. I don't care anymore. I want to wash my hands with this. Like, I just don't think it's gonna be that easy. Hezbollah can launch missiles at any time to draw Israel back into the conflict and draw criticism from the world because Israel is escalating the conflict in response to Hezbollah part, of what Iran has been doing is using Hezbollah to make this conflict also about Lebanon, which it successfully did, right? Because now Israel because now Iran can call off Hezbollah for a short period of time while demanding Israel adhere to a ceasefire in which it's perpetually under threat from Hezbollah and the North. So it's just the stupidity of this war, we will just be living with it for just a very, very long time. Yeah, I mean, the Iranis have said they've made clear that if the Israelis hit targets in parts of Beirut, they will fire back directly at Tel Aviv . And that's the linkage they created in the two conflicts. And I think it's a very dangerous place for Netanyahu to be because people, especially in northern Israel, feel like they're living under constant threat from Hezbollah bombardment. They are. It's totally fair to feel that way . But in terms of as a security measure, this is just backfire outfired spectacularly for Nenyo. Let's talk about how the memo is playing in Maga World, which has been divided over Iran . Bloodthirsty warmonger Lindsey Graham raised some eyebrows when he tweeted that, while he was pleased to hear the strait will be reopened, he's quote somewhat concerned with what the Iranians are saying about the MO believes that Congress must have the final say on any nuclear agreement, and quote , it is imperative that the architect of the deal, Vice President Vance and his negotiating partners, end quote, be part of presenting any final deal to Congress . So what's that all about, you think? And have you guys seen any other noteworthy reactions from either the anti war magafaction or the Iran hawks John Bolton criticizing it. The Lindsey Graham being unable to criticize Trump because Donald Trump cannot fail. He can only be failed. It's so pathetic. You want to hang this around JD Vance's neck because he's easier to criticize , you feel like you have a little bit more you're just not scared of the guy. It's just it's all sort of the usual pathetic instagram. The anti Iran hawks are losing their minds. I interpreted Graham's comments both as wrapping this thing around J D Vance's neck, but also maybe suggesting that this would be subject to a sixty seven vote threshold in the Senate, which means it would be dead . Or yeah, treaties require two thirds vote. The JCPOA was not treated as a treaty, thus future presidents were not bound by it. So maybe that's the argument here . But like Mark Levin , the Fox News host, is losing his mind on an hourly basis. He's getting in fights with micropenismart. The national security team yeah , the Neocon think tanks are losing their minds. There's one called FDD, the foundation for the Defense of Democracy, which is just this garbage human beings propped up by right wing billionaire money who do nothing but push for wars that they nor their kids will ever fight in. I haven't heard APAC weigh in. That's they've been sort of suspiciously quiet. So but the hawkish wing of the Republican Party is furious. They know this is a capitulation. They know Trump lost. They're just trying to figure out how to undo it. I hate to break it to Lindsey Graham and maybe JD Vance, but I don't think Congress will be viewing any kind of deal anytime soon because I just can't imagine a deal actually getting done at this point. You can see Graham going after Vance is, like you said, because he just can't criticize Trump, but also it's kind of like a warning shot to JD Vance about twenty twenty eight. And it did make me think that if this goes as we think it's going to go and the Iran war hawks are all pissed off. Someone's going to try to launch some kind of a more pro war campaign in the Republican primary against JD Vance that is destined to fail by the way. Tom Cotton or something exactly. But you could see Lindsey Cruz Yeah L,indsey , they want to kind of hold JD Vance up as like beware, beware. We're going to come after we're going to come after you in a primary with our hawks, which is like, ooh, I'd be so scared. Yeah , I don't really know that's going to work, but you can see that. You can see that maybe like Ted Cruz who's, also I saw thinking about a presidential campaign again. Amazing, amazing stuff. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Not everyone experiences summer as an endless parade of hot dogs, vacations and pool parties. For some people, life's woes don't abate when the temperature climbs and the days get longer. You've got summertime blues or simply feeling overwhelmed, betterHelp is there when you need it. With over thirty thousand therapists, BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform having served over six million people globally. And it works with an average rating of four point nine out of five for a live session based on one over point seven million client reviews. Better help therapists work according to a strict code of conduct and are fully licensed in the U. S. BetterHelp does the initial matching work for you so you can focus on your therapy goals. A short questionnaire helps identify your needs and preferences . If you aren't happy with your match, switch to different therapists at any time from their tailored recs, love therapy. It's great. You need it. I needed it. Everybody needed it. You don't have to say yes to everything this summer. Find support in therapy. Sign up at get ten percent off at better help dot com slash psa. That's better h elp dot com slash psa. Pots of America's brought you by Willie's Remedy. I love Willie's. Willie's a premium infused social tonic crafted by the legendary Willie Nelson . It is a low calorie, low sugar alcohol alternative that actually works delivering a fast acting euphoric social buzz without the regrets that come with alcohol. Willie Social Tonics come in five MG and ten MG doses. I get the five. I want to go crazy. With the best in class flavor experience so smooth and balanced, you barely realize you're drinking a THC product at all. At my wedding, we had Willie's and Tonic called a Grin and Tonic. You can enjoy the tonics of the shot sipped over ice or mixed into your favorite cocktail, like what I just said. Each bottle of Wooly's is third party lab tested for accurate dosage so you can trust and customize your experience. The unique blend of THCBD, CBG and Leaning delivers a feeling of calm, clarity, euphoria, and relaxation. One shot of Woolys helps you relax on wind and distress, perfect for taking edge the off at the end of a long day or socializing with friends. Willie's offers the kind of feeling that makes good company even better. Willie's sold out three times in the first six months with over fifty thousand happy customers and they just restocked. Willie ships directly to your door in forty states order now at drink Willie. com and use codecriced for twenty percent of your first order plus free shipping on orders over ninety five dollars. I'm a huge fan of Willies. It's really great . Enjoy life in the high country. Go to drinkwillies dot com and use Code Cricut I want to touch on all the political implications of all this for the midterms and beyond. There's a question of how long it will take for high gas prices and other straight related disruptions to end, a question of whether Trump and Republicans will be able to just move on from Iran and pretend like it never happened, even if the next phase of negotiations hasn't led to a deal by November . And then there's the question of what Democrats say about any of this over the next few weeks and month s . Tommy, you want to take the I know you have some thoughts on the last one, especially. Being a Democrat in this situation is very hard because we are trying to be responsible. And if a Democrat was cutting this deal, Barack Obama was making this agreem ent. Republicans would say, you're weak, you're a coward, you lost, you know, rinse, repeat on Fox News, ad nauseum. And it's a simple and powerful message, you know, strength versus weakness . Our job is harder because again, ending the war was the best of a bad set of options. But we need to explain why Trump starting the war has made us worse off as a nation because I think we just need to kill in finally this neocon argument that you can bomb your way to peace. We heard this in Iraq. Somehow it wasn't discredited then. Now we're at war with Iran, and it's just a nightmare. And so again, it's repeating that we failed on the core objectives and just arguing that we could have gotten the deal Trump will potentially get after the sixty days of negotiation without ever going to war. The original Sin was not in twenty eighteen just trying to renegotiate the JCPOA. And I think Democrats need to be more full throated in support of diplomatic solutions to problems, stopping being afraid of their own shadow on this stuff, and more full throated about why regime change wards in the Middle East are a disaster. I thought we'd all gotten there, but apparently not. Yeah. The good news is war this was extremely unpopular , like shockingly unpopular. Sixty days from now is like mid August. And so two possibilities, well it's a whole range of possibilities, but two possibilities are there is a deal in which, case Trump will do everything he can to make it seem like he did this amazing move to start the war, to get us to a position to negotiate the deal. And that'll be about selling that'll be about us telling just the story of how we got here and how stupid and dangerous and bad it was. And then the other is God only knows the kind of chaos that could happen in the next sixty days, you know? There's algae in the he drained the fucking reflecting pool to paint it blue, but the algae's back. He's not, you know, he's he does not have some magical ability to avoid the realities of the world and like the I think we will it will be so close to the election by the time we either get to a deal or don't that we will be able to, I think, make it a big part of people's dissatisfaction with the economy, the high cost of living and everything that will carry on for weeks from now, if not months from now. The straight of Roemves is not a valve you turn on and off. It's not like gas is now flowing. It's like oil futures prices can go down quickly, but tankers will now have to come out and future tankers will have to go back in, load up their gas and then transit it. Like I think there are already reports that these oil and gas companies are kind of moving cautiously because they don't know that this isn't a final deal. There's no agreement, there's no nuclear agreement. Trump is threatening to go back to war . And so I just don't think this is going to be resolved quickly. It was like months probably. I think even under the best case scenario, gas prices come down between now and November, but they don't end up where they were before this conflict started at all because it's just going to take time even the most conservative economic estimates are saying that. I also think for Democrats, you go out there and say, Donald Trump just spent the last year embroiling this country in a war that he lost that cost us upwards of maybe one hundred billion dollars and then however many more billion dollars people paid in higher fuel costs. And he hasn't seemed to have learned any lessons nor have the Republicans in Congress . And if you return a Republican Congress to him , they're just going to create more war. They're going to jump into more wars. He's still talking about Cuba. He still has Greenland on his mind. Like the guy is a bloodthirsty maniac and so are the Republicans in Congress who approved it. And you do want them, do them to spend even more of your money on more war and making the like what did this war get us? It got us nothing. Nothing. Nothing. It's just cost it got us nothing and it cost us a lot. Fourteen people died, thousands of people dying in the region . And just like it made us less safe, it didn't make the country any safer. You know, when we talk about like, you know, like cost being higher, like and it's always very abstract. Like people's lives are ruined by the fact that suddenly their fuel went up where they suddenly didn't have access to raw materials. Like this had a huge ramifications for the global economy that we felt for a very long time. And by the way, everyone who's just predicting, oh this is when this is when gas prices will go down. This is when oil prices will go down. The market says what the oil is worth right now. The market says what the gas prices are worth. If people thought and knew that the prices would go down, they'd already be down. People have no idea what the future holds because we're dealing with fucking maniacs and the complexities of reopening the strait and all the rest . Nobody knows what gas prices will be in September or October. If they did, that's what the price would be. So one funny footnote on the timing of when the Iran agreement was announced, the Iranians didn't want to do it on Trump's actual birthday . So they waited until it was Monday in Tehran just to be as petty as fuck, which got to hand it to him, I guess. I guess. It was like they literally used the time change to keep both Trump and the Iranians happy then. Tr Soump could say he announced it on his birthday, but the Iranians can say no, we didn't because it was Monday here. It's not your eightieth birthday. It's adults who care about their birthday. Everything being about Trump's fucking birthday is also embarrassing. The Iranians feeling like they can get one over on Trump by kind of holding it to not sign it technically on the birthday is stupid, but it's in response to dealing with a guy that clearly wanted the fun of signing the thing on his fucking birthday. But you happen to have a world run by tyrants, they're all just little petty bitches. It's unbelievable. So dumb. Of course, none of this stopped Trump from celebrating the deal, or himself. He threw a loki party at the White House Sunday night where the South Lawn was transformed into a Vegas style UFC arena that hosted a cage match attended by four thousand lucky guests and broadcasted to Paramount plus subscribers. The sixty million dollar event paid for by the UFC and other sponsors . It was truly surreal to watch. Here's some of what it looked like. I'll just sort of narrate this for those of you who are just listening . There's Trump and Dana White walking out of the oval. There's a flyover. I love it's flyover. And here's an actual eagle . It's called thirty six. There's the fight . One of the fights, yeah, there's a couple. There's a little evil carnival action happening. This is one of the fighters walking out from the oval. Michelle Obama is a man . Am I right America ? Yeah, even the crowds like it. And that was Josh Hokkat who won the heavyweight fight . He's apparently said that before. That was this is like a bit of his. He said it before in a fight. He put it on his Instagram like last year. And so, you know, it's, I don't know if that makes it better or worse. It's a far right naga thing. They've been saying it for a long time. But for him, especially is what I'm saying. So what's you guys think of the of the fight? So I feel like everybody combined a couple a bunch of things. Like one was the just the brazen corruption of the whole thing and having bud light sponsorships on the White House lawn and the crypto stuff and all the rest . The fact that Donald Trump made this event about him and not the country, I think that's a big part of it. If this were a Democratic White House, that also had poetry slams and readings by Pulitzer prize winning journalists and other kind of sophisticated events. And then one day Barack Obama was like, Guess what? We're going to motorcycles jumping over each other on the south London , that's great. Having an eagle fly around and land on somebody's arm during the during America celebration, that's great. All these sort of busy bodies on social media being like Thornton Wilder once visited the White House. Like, guys, guys, can you can you please not be a bunch of prissy stuck up people? People like fucking motorcycles. I have no problem with that. That is entertaining and it could be on the White House lawn. Zero problem with that. It is the corruption and the making it about him and it being a right wing maga thing, like that is the problem. Yeah, like presidents hold events on the South Lawn, sometimes it's a concert, sometimes it's a dude in a bunny suit, rolling Easter eggs, sometimes it's a cage fight. It's like is what it is. That didn't bother me either. The corporate sponsorship stuff that we're going to get into a minute is where it gets really gross. But just politically, I don't know that it was smart for Trump. I think UFC fans will love it. Trump super fans will love it . Regular people that are pissed about inflation are just gonna be like, what are you are you doing? How spending your time this way? The Reuters said a poll, just sixteen percent of Americans said it was appropriate for Trump to hold the ultimate fighting championship event for his eightieth birthday. Well, forty six percent said it was inappropriate to rest were like whatever. I don't care anymore. So whatever it is what it is, but also like there's a lot better sports to watch this weekend the next one , the NBA championship. There was a million World Cup games. The Stanley Cup finals were on. Like I was doing other things. I don't know what paramount Plus so I couldn't even watch it. We have Paramount Plus for some kids programs. And it was so I watched the whole thing. And I tried to watch it as someone who was just like, okay, what if I was not really paying attention to politics? What would this look like? And like, first of all, the production value outstanding, A plus, it looked great. Like the whole event looked really cool. There were like and look there are some UFC fighters who have commented publicly about how this is like a gross thing to do and cynical for the president to make it all about him and we're going to talk about the corruption and all that . The parts that made it more about Trump were the parts that you were like, what is this? You know? And first of all, also the fights weren't that great. Which is like, I'm not a UFC person, but it was like all of them were kind of quick and first round knockouts. Yeah. And they were like knockouts, but I don't know, it was just and then you see like it's just like that the number of times it panned Trump and then it talked about Trump. And then like, then there's Mark Zuckerberg. And then there's the president of crypto dot com and all this kind of shit. And so like all of the accoutrements around it were like could get really annoying. But the fight itself and the way it looked at the White House lit in the background like looked pretty cool. But this is where we should talk we'll talk about the corruption, but this is where you can't separate the fact that he is so corrupt from the event itself because Donald Trump is trying to steal the patriotism and excitement and prestige of America's birthday and kind of put it on himself. But the end result is really just he gets his stink on like the White House and the event itself because if you didn't know that this was so partisan and so corrupt and such a boondoggle and such favoritism and just so much corporate interest , then like maybe it wouldn't be so terrible to have a flyover or to have marines standing behind a fighter, whatever. It may not be the kind of thing I would normally want to watch, but it wouldn't be so despicable, but to use the military and to use these symbols for such a corrupt practice, I think is why the whole thing becomes so sordid and ugly. Yeah, I will say the walking the fighters out through the oval in the diproom and having all like the Marines there saluting the like it was that part was like a little because it's a for profit event and because yeah for profit event and the whole America two hundred and fifty thing too, because it's like whatever president is leading the country when it's America's two hundred fiftieth or two hundred seventy five or three hundred, whatever, you get to do your own thing, right? But they sort of went out of the way to make it feel exclusionary to anyone who wasn't Maga and just in the way that they did the event, right? Like they could and not just by being a UFC fight, you could have done a UFC fight that still seems welcoming and unifying to most of the country. This is where like it's back to where Trump was in the first term where he was always taking pictures in front of the desk. They're fucking tourists because they know they don't belong. And so they walk through this gold plated room that looks like a gold fungal infection and kind of they show through these fighters walking through all the rooms. Like a bit like the kind of it reminds me of like when like human beings in some apocalyptic future stumble upon a museum and they're walking through looking around being like who built this? How was this even here? Like that's sort of the feeling of it to me Pods of America is brought you by Tommy John this summer don't be that guy. You know the one the one who has full sweat pools under his arm sticking to his shirt in the heat. Well eat Tommy John, that's gonna be me. All right . I like your underwear but, this is what's gonna happen. I can't stop it. Public transport is a sauna. Your walk to work feels medically unsafe, but Tommy John is covered with breathable underwear and undershirts designed to keep you cool dry and significantly less swamp like. Just know that Tommy John base layers are lightweight, moisture working and built with breathable stretch fabric that actually moves with you so you're not spending your morning presentation wondering if people can see the outline of your entire back in sweat. Your first purchase is covered by the risk free guarantee, so if you're not happy, Tommy John will make it right. With over thirty million pairs of underwear sold. There are thousands of guys out there more comfortable than you right now. So don't suffer this summer. I love Tommy John. I wear only Tommy John underwear. It's the best. Genuinely . So go to TommyJohn. com today and save twenty five percent on your first order with codecrooked. Comfort perfected, just use code crooked to check out and upgrade your essentials today. Hiring isn't just about finding someone willing to take the job. You need the right person with the right background who can move your business forward. If you want candidates who match what you're looking for, trust indeed sponsored jobs. And listeners of this show will get a one hundred pound sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves at indeed dot com slash broadcast. Just go to indeed dot com slash broadcast right now and support this show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast indeed. com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply hiring, do it the right way with indeed . You know that song that goes, Every rose has its thorn that basically describes every June. When it comes to the Supreme Court, summer is just starting, but the Supreme Court term is ending, which means we're waiting for some massively consequential and possibly devastating Supreme Court decisions on birthright citizenship, trans athletes, and absentee ballots. I'm Leah Littmann, and along with my co host and fellow law professors Melissa Murray and Kate Shaw, will break down every opinion and what it means on strict scrutiny. New episodes of strict scrutiny drop every Monday and keep an eye on your feed for emergency episodes when the big opinions come out. Watch on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcasts It would have been entirely possible for Trump to throw himself a sixty million dollars UFC birthday party without also turning it into an orgy of corruption, but that would take all the fun out of it . First the broadcast itself , Dana White originally said that the fight would be free on CBS now owned by Paramount, but it ended up on the nine dollars ninety nine cents per month Paramount plus instead. Paramount is, of course, owned now by Trump allied Trump ally David Ellison, who had a front row seat to the fight two days after Trump's DOJ approved his latest acquisition of Warner Brothers Discovery, which includes CNN. I think there also was like a brunch or a dinner for David Ellison that weekend too. Big party for that. So everyone was celebrating the big merger . As for Trump himself, ahead of the fight, the president quietly purchased between fifteen thousand and fifty thousand worth of stock in TKO Holding Group, which owns UFC, which is nothing for him, but like optically so stupid . You know what I mean? Just don't do that. Just doesn't care anymore. There were also some tweets that appear to be between Eric Trump and UFC commentator Daniel Cormir looking for insight information for betting on the fights. The Cormier is saying publicly that his account was hacked . Not to fear the fight still offered plenty of opportunities to make the Trump family richer . Take a listen. two hundred fifty thousand dollars performance bonus and USD one is presented by World Liberty Financial Close captioning for tonight's broadcast is sponsored by Trump Corps dot com The official trading special edition medallions. This bout is proudly sponsored by Truth Social , the real voice of President Trump . Download Truth Social today Well, I was watching that film. That's what I was like, this is it's too much. If you didn't catch all that, one of the official sponsors of the event was the Trump's family crypto operation, World Liberty Financial. We've talked about this a lot here . For this event, they created a two hundred fifty thousand bonus pool for the fighters , which is to be paid in their stablecoin, USD one . And then you heard there was also a sponsorship plug there for trumpcoins dot com which is selling commemorative medallions designed by President Trump at prices up to twelve thousand dollars apiece coin heavy event? No, real coin heavy. It's just an idiot. Whoever's buying these fucking coins? Reacting to a bunch of these stories, the White House said that Donald Trump only acts in the best interest of the American public . And that his assets are in a trust managed by his children. So what's the problem guys? Jesus Christ. I mean, politically speaking, Trump should be furious that this thing was on Paramount Plus, right? That limits the distribution. That hurts him, right? This is his propaganda. And why is it not seen by more people? So you're like, okay, I get what Paramount Plus got. They got to add su bs to get people to buy this. What's the kickback? I'd like to know . The crypto stuff is disgraceful. Remember like the USD one is their stablecoin. Remember the Trumps got the Emirates to use their stablecoin in this transaction when they invest ed two billion into Binance that made it the seventh biggest stablecoin in the world. And then Reuters did this big investigation of the Trump family crypto assets. They found the Trump family's made two point three billion in profit. And then, of course, on the other side of that, you have like a million retail investors who've gotten fleeced and have taken two point three billion in losses . So this is just an ongoing show of the way they're using crypto just to like ring money out of their followers. I find the Eric Trump , what's his name? Daniel ier thing makes no sense. Like Eric Trump So those stories he dammed the guy said, Hey is, this fight rigged because I want to bet on it? And then Cormier is like, No, I got AI hacked. What does that mean? You posted the tweet? It did it make sense when Eric said he deleted it because it was fake. But then why would he have posted? Eric Trump was the first time I believed it might be true was when Eric Trump posted it. Yes, me too. And then and then Daniel Cornell, he was asked about it at the fight and was just like, That's crazy. Why would anyone believe that? And then he like tweeted, are you all stupid? Why would you? But like you posted it. It's interesting because if you look at the exchanges that they posted or the DM that they posted, it's very it's not like it's not as obvious as like hello and are there any fights rigged? I would like to bet on them. Like you play. How's it going? And he's like, Oh, I didn't expect to hear from you, man. It's good to see you and your family at the fight. Can't wait. He's like, Hey, plays any bits and then he just keeps going. He's like, All right, fine, I'll get to it. Any of the fights rigged. Who knows what's real or what's fake anymore? Anything could have happened. Could have been hacked, some one could have done it. I don't know, but yeah. Well, this is the problem with these people being tell the corrupt liars. They're corrupt liars who it is completely believable to me that it's fake. It is completely believable to me that it is true. You have no credibility I would not be surprised in either direction. You are completely morally vacant operators who are profiting every day off the office. We can't take your word for it. Maybe we'll never know the truth 'cause everyone you is a liar, but that's the price of being so dishonest, I guess. Celebrity attendance at the event was mostly limited to the Maga billionaire sector, in addition to David Ellison and the crypto dot com CEO , MMA enthusiast and masculinity advocate Mark Zuckerberg was in attendance . Maybe not quite out of Dullah's baggage claim yet were executives from Anthropic, who apparently flew to the Capitol last minute to meet with the Trump administration on Monday on Friday, the administration slapped export controls on the company's top AI models, which forced Anthropic to take Fable five and Mythos five offline. Anyone want to talk about what this is all about with Anthropic and whether it has anything to do with their earlier dispute with the Pentagon. This to me actually similar to the Eric Trump thing. It's because we know that they picked this fight with Anthropic a few months ago, it's actually hard to know what's true. If you read the details, there does seem to have been a legitimate concern with access to the models that were raised by Amazon and others. But then it appears the administration, which has a vendetta against Anthropic maybe went too far in its reaction and now the executives have to fly to DC to make nice because it's not about what's in the interest of the Pentagon or the country, but it's about personal relationships and ego. And so they have to figure out how to smooth things over and you can it is just very hard to tell the difference between penalizing anthropic because it's now an enemy of the administration versus actually stepping in because there may have been an issue or if it's somewhere in between. Yeah , I mean, so there was a concern about anthropics model and the ability for it to find cybersecurity vulnerabilities and exploit them. So they limited the distribution. And then these researchers at Amazon got access to Fable five, which is like it's like mythos with guardrails that they release to the public . They were able to trick it essentially into giving them restricted information. And then the Amazon CEO titled to Scott Besson about what happened. Now, normally . Normally I',d be like, actually , that's good. That's like how the system should work because you want, you know, sort of a circuit breaker there in some way to prevent the distribution of these models to bad actors. What the administration did was they cut off access for foreign users . But yeah, I mean, it just the thing that was so odd about this is all the little Trump propagandists went to Twitter and they tried to dance on Anthropic's grave and they gave all of us reason to think, oh actually this is just part of this ongoing pissing match between anthropic and the Pentagon and because anthropic doesn't want to create autonomous killer drones or be used in bulk mass surveillance of American citiz ens. Yeah, it was hard to read between the lines and the Axios story about it too, which is also like, you know that the Axios story kind of came mostly from the administration. And there's some administration official in background saying like the real problem is they don't know how to anthropic doesn't know how to communicate with this administration and the ideological differences are really getting in the way. And it's like, what does that have to do with a potential security vulnerability that you're saying was the root of the problem here? What is the ideological differences in communication have to do with anything? Also, if you know that, if you have insight enough to know that they're not communicating effectively with you, then it seems you know what they're trying to communicate. Call them. Yeah, so hey, like , you're not being nice enough in how you're handling me. to you want If you want me do what, you better you better be a little bit more sensitive to my issues and my needs. In anthropics preparing for an IPO, it seems like a great way to damage them in advance of that. Yes, yeah. But for what it's worth, we should say Dana White and a bunch of other participants at the White House event condemned the comments about Michelle Obama, which was nice to see. Now the right thing to do would be Donald Trump to call Michelle Obama and say I'm so sorry that was disgusting, but that obviously the White House sort of wouldn't even make a just sort of brush bastard refused to apologize . In the moment, you actually see Rogan's face as soon as he said it and Rogan was sort of like you like backed away like a guy. Do you see what smallest tie was? It was very like a half a time. Like what to hear? You could tell that like the, yeah, the Dana Whites, the people and Donald Trump was probably like yeah, like Donald Trump was probably like, yeah, he probably loved it. He's reposted stuff like that in the past. Well, the guy then gave his like metal to Donald Trump, the guy who made the comment and Dald Trump accepted it. So it was like Trump posted a video of the two of them. Right as apes. Yeah , we were sort of six months ago through the looking glass on that one. One more corrupt date that broke as we were preparing to record this, Gavin Newsom said in a video Monday morning that he and wife his are being targeted by Trump's DOJ, saying that federal agents have been knocking on the doors of their family friends and former employees in Newsom's words. He said they're digging through quote years and years of documents and quote abusing the grand jury process trying to quote, look for crime. Then there was this line. Donald Trump isn't just coming after me because of my mean tweets. He's coming after me because I'm considering running for president. He then went on to attack Trump on corruption for several minutes. We didn't get a ton of detail from Newsom's statement other than the DOJ seems to be focused on Jen, his wife. I saw some takes about how this will be great for Newsom's potential presidential campaign and fundraising, sure. But it also seems like a fair ly chilling preview of what's to come in twenty twenty eight for any Democrat who runs for president. I don't know. What do you guys think? Yeah, look, it's nice to say it's great for fundraising before we know any of the details about what the charges could be, how serious it is , what they're trying to do. But I don't think anybody , even if it does make them get some attention is excited to find out that they're sort of there's a grand jury trying to indict you . And we have gone from Pam Bondi, who was as pliant and willing to do Trump's bidding as you could imagine until we got to Todd Blanche, who's somehow even worse Trum.p just put his personal attorney in charge of the Southern District of New York. We have a completely politicized department of justice unlike anything we've ever had before in our history, and part of the job will be about not only prevent ing those things from impacting our politics directly, but also figuring out how to create guardrails and fix it in the future once Trump is gone. Yeah, as much as I can understand the kind of galaxy brained political takes, like the human take is Gavin Newsom sits down at dinner and is like, Hey, honey, this is going to help me in the early states. Like, what are we talking about here? It's like horribly chilling for your wife to be potentially prosecuted by the Department of Justice, even if she did nothing wrong. It's scary, it'll cost them money, it'll cost them time. Yeah, I look the, maximum cynical view is that Trump is doing this because he thinks Gavin's talented and a possible competitor to the Republican Party and wants to take him out of the race preemptively by going after his family . Maybe it's all on the merits, right? There was a Gavin Newsom former aid who was just prosecuted, maybe it's coming out of that. What we know is Trump has openly called on his attorney general to go after his enemies. He just tried to install Bill Polte, a man with no national security experience as the director of national ell Iigntence solely because that man is shown a creativity in using his access to information to go after Trump's critics. So it seems like part of a pattern. Yeah, I mean it is the cynical view. It's also the like we've seen from Trump over the last decade leads you to believe that whoever he thinks is leading in the race for the Democratic nomination, he's going to look to see if there were any kind of possibilities for investigation, right? Like that's all it takes to is so yeah, so Gavin Newsom's former aide, right, who ended up , you know, being convicted or taking a deal or something based on activities that preceded her time working for Gavin Newsom at all . But it doesn't matter, you know, like Jen Newsom has some kind of a nonprofit and is there is there questions about the nonprofit and the payments? Like any thread that Trump and his administration can pull on any of these potential contenders, they will . And probably knowing that they can't actually investigate all of them at once when they're all on the primary stage together, they're going to go after the people who are leading in the polls. Really, I think the only way you're going to avoid investigation from Donald Trump is if you were last place in the polls and suddenly surprise everyone and then win win a race and then you know then they'll get an investigation going pretty fast. Yeah, but that's like going to go. We need like a junior Soprano to be the kind of to be in the face of the operation while Tony's running things behind the scenes. So Ben Jacobs on Twitter was like, this is a good case for Hunter Biden being the nominee since he was already already part of that part y investigated. Don't get many ideas . He's already flooding himself for this. But that I mean, it is it's pretty to me it was like a preview of even now we're like, okay, Democrats could do all in the midterms, everything's fine. Like we're heading to twenty twenty eight and the idea that this is just going to be some kind of a fair fight. And even if there's a lot between Donald Trump refusing to leave the White House or running for a third term and then everything going swimmingly and nothing happened. There's just a ton of room between them. I think we just can say whoever is the Democratic nominee , regardless of what investigation launched for the primary . There will be an intensive effort to try to paint them as a corrupt criminal sort of say sort of June and the election. They will use all the power at their disposal. They will try to muddy the waters. And by the way, like part of this is this is why selective prosecution is so dangerous. We live in a free society and we know that if you start digging into anyone's finances, taxes, history, you can try to drum something up, you can find a discrepancy . You can find something that you can use to bring to a grand jury. Like the that is what it is so dangerous to have a DOJ like this and you know that the client right wing media, if they find anything, they will say, well, look, this is this was a legitimate investigation. They found this IRS discrepancy. This needed to be punished and without sort of any understanding of how dangerous is to have people being chosen as targets to look for crimes. Did Gevin front run this? Yeah. Yeah. So I'm going to say the time story did I wonder if they got a call from the Times saying we're running this and they got ahead of it or how this went because I do the Times Story does have some of some newsome officials on the background in there. And it also has some officials , I guess, from the Justice Department as well, though the Justice Department won't comment officially, obviously . They also said that it was like started by federal officials in California, not in Washington the investigation . But I do think that it was we haven't talked about like the politics of this, but I thought it was smart that Newsom got out ahead of it and was able to frame it as Trump coming in. Yeah, I mean it just shows how much communic ations have changed over the last decade or two because normally when there's some sort of criminal prosecution or investigation, you don't say anything. You let your lawyers speak or you don't comment and you don't want to put anything else in the public domain . They view this as a PR battle, which tells you they probably feel confident about the legal side of things and they just want to get ahead of the political fight. I also think this is going to be a collective action problem because everyone's interests are obviously not aligned here, but I've read the other Democratic and no one's announced yet, so it doesn't work right now. But as we get into this, like all the other Democratic candidates, someone gets targeted like this, even if it's your potential rival, you got to go out and say that it's absolutely bullshit. Stick up for them. I think they'll get stick up for each other. Yeah, I think that's also free, by the way. Like, I don't think there's a lot of equity for people but just saying, I think Trump has a point about Newsom. Like I don't think there's a lot of there's a difference between there's a difference between waiting to get asked about it and saying that and then coming out strongly. Yeah. And saying it's going to be a fucking problem. What about going down to John Bolton's prison and singing him some sort of song through show Yeah. Is he where is he right now? Because I saw his comment was that he cut a deal, right? He's cutting a deal but he could, I don't think it's gone through the process yet, but I think you could get up to five years, even with this deal. He was just money. I thought he was just paying money. The reporting I read was fine potentially up to five years . Hopefully for his sake, that there'll be some leniency. But like the dude was like sending emails to himself and to his wife and daughter with classified information. It was like the dumbest thing you could possibly do. Look, I've said this before. I'll say it again. I hate what Donald Trump has done to the DOJ. I will not be angry if James Coney goes to prison . Wow . eighty seconds. Listen, I'll obviously be upset about the injustice, but I'm just saying he used a couple nights behind those bars to think about what he's done. I'm just he's so tall and he's made so many mistakes . I think it's morally reprehensible. I don't think it's a good thing. I'm just saying I think he'll videos what he does post everything he does. I think that has been an imprisonment all of its own. Sure. I don't think he needs to share inside of a jail cell. Just saves. No worries a bulwark exclusive. They're up at that ceiling . Run that tin cup across the bars, James Comey. MSNBC reports that the Trump administration has been pressuring DOJ officials to come up with a case against Gavin Newsom. Yeah, I mean so there you go. All right, when we come back, Tommy talks to Senator Mark Warner . Potty America is brought to you by mill in our polarized climate. There's one thing that unites us all. Dealing with communal household and office trash is terrible. The food waste, the smell, the constant overflowing trash cans. That wasn't until Mill took care of it. While we weren't even looking. Mill is the Odorless, effortless fully automated food recycler, potato peels avoc,ad o pits, chicken bones, even dairy, milk takes almost anything. Nice. While you sleep, milk quietly transforms food scraps into nutrient rich, shelf stable grounds, no mess, no smell. No fruit flies. You can use the grounds in your garden, add them to curbside, compost , or mill can even pick them up and get them to a small farm for you. And mill offers a ninety day risk retrial. So if you don't love it, you can just send it back. We have a mill recycler in the crooked kitchen. Crooked mill stats, we recycle a total of two hundred fifty five and pounds of food scrapes so far. That's about fifty one pounds a month. Cricut staffer Zevi, a great designer, takes the food grounds home to use in her garden. Try mill risk free for ninety days and get seventy five dollars off at mill. com slash crooked and use code Cricut, that's seventy five dollars off at mill dot com slash crooked and use the code crooked . Indeed, presents hires you can't afford to get wrong, like Warehouse Operations Manager. Where are the fortlifts? I sold them. They were too expensive. I got a great deal on these scooters though. You expect us to move a two ton pallet on a scooter. It'll be fun. Just think of the core strength you'll build. This is a job for sponsored jobs. This is what happens when you don't sponsor your job on indeed. So the next time you need someone to get the job done right, get matched with quality candidates with an indeed sponsored job. Visit indeed. com slash next hire and sponsor your job today. Looking for your next office. Discover WeWorks' new real estate platform built for a smarter way to work, with forty five million square feet of office space in one hundred and twenty cities across thirty four countries. We've got you covered. For global coworking to custom office solutions, visit Weewk. com My guest today is Vice Chair of the Senate intelligence committee and the senior US Senator from Virginia, Senator Warner, thanks for doing the show. Thanks, Tommy. So we're speaking on Monday afternoon Pacific time. We're still waiting with bated breath to see if we'll ever see the actual text of whatever Donald Trump negotiated with Iran about their strait of Hormuz . What do you know about this digitally signed memorandum of understanding between the U. S. and Iran. And what do you make on sort of the leaks in reporting on it so far? I know Zippo . I know nothing more than you and I think frankly , even my Republican Senate friends have not seen any of this We do wonder whether this was time for his birthday or to try to affect the markets today . We do know I think this is less than what it appears. And we knew at some point Trump was going to declare victory . And the sooner we get out of this war of choice, the better . But if as, you know, I hate to kind of like suck up, but if you look at your tweets today , you know, you are absolutely right on all four of the goals that Trump laid out. We're not close to any of them. Yeah, it sounds like we maybe have an agreement to have more talks where they will try to get to an agreement that's about the nuclear program, the ballistic missiles, support for proxies, et cetera. But it's all forward looking as far as I can tell, right? Yeah . You know , one the things we do know are this . The regime is more hardcore now than it was before. The new leader has sentially killed his dad, his wife, his kid, more hardcore . We do know that the Iranians have been masters for years at trying to hide the ball on their enriched Iran ium. And the idea that we're somehow going to get this without troops on the ground or by some international agreement, God willing, but I'm not going to hold my breath . The fact that the DOD and HegSef misrepresented how much we had taken out of the Iranian ballistic missiles , obviously not the case since they're still shooting them off, and that doesn't even count their drones. And then we've taken what was an international open gateway of passage straight of Hormuz , and Iran will have something to say on a going forward basis. None of that makes us, none of that makes our Gulf Allies. None of it even frankly makes Israel stronger than when we started one hundred and seven days ago? Yeah, I mean, Senator, I noticed in the run ups of the war, the Iran hawks trotted out of the new talking point, which is that Iran could create a ballistic missile arsenal that was so great that it might be able to prevent the U. S. and Israel from taking out their nuclear infrastructure in the future. So I did want to ask you about the state of that ballistic missile inventory and their capacity to manufacture new ballistic missiles . What do we know that you can discuss publicly? Well, we know that we have degraded some it's both the missiles and their launchers. We took out some of them . The earlier estimates, and I can say this because it's in the public that we had eliminated seventy eight ,y, ninety percent are just factually not true . And they have had many of the launchers as well are still existing . They can they can obviously reconstitute some of these missiles. We have not been able to blow up how all that started . And these missiles are significant. But again, we took down many of them . But as we go into this war of choice, what we have done and this is the part where the Iranians , I think will come back unfortunately and bite us is they have been dribbling out their missiles . We have been using both with the missiles and the drones very expensive interceptors that cost two and a half million dollars apiece and they have bled down our supplies , our supplies, Gulf Allies, even Israel supplies so that if they have anything close to what we presume they can continue to bleed that down and at some point we won't have the capacity to take them out. One of the one of the reasons why it was so insane that we didn't take the Ukrainians offer in December where they were going to say we will give you our antidrone technology in which they have the best in the world, which could have at least taken down the Iranian drones. Right, right. And you mentioned the new sort of set of leaders. I mean, the previous supreme leader of Iran was quite well known. He'd been around for a while . As were a lot of the senior members of the IRGC and the Iranian military, then Israel and the US killed a lot of them . Now it's Iran is led by this new crop of leaders. The Supreme Leader's son is apparently really wounded in hiding, but presumably more hardline than maybe his father since, we killed his dad , we killed his wife, we killed his kids, I think, reportedly. Now there's a new crop of younger IRGC generals who seem to be more firmly entrenched. Trump keeps saying that the new crowd is more pragmatic. What do you know about the New Krout? There is absolutely zero evidence that anybody in the New Krout is more pragmatic, that is more westward leaning . They may live in fear. I think we have put fear of God in them , but the idea that they're more willing to make a deal, there's been no evidence to date that I've seen any intelligence on that. As a matter of fact, the structure in Orion was they always had they have a government and they have a former military that's a little bit separate from the RGC . The one thing that is the case is that the government, which was sometimes more moderate in the more traditional military , they have lost power in this last one hundred and eight days. So IRGC, more radical, more in power. Excellent. A big win for us. What we think is maybe the outlines of a future deal would require Israel to honor a ceasefire in Lebanon against Hezbollah as well. Do you have any confidence that Netanyahu or Hezbollah will honor that ceasefire? Because it seems like has a pretty decent political incentive to blow up the deal given the initial response to it in Israel. I have no confidence that BB's got his own political problems and I think in many ways has really hurt Israel's reputation in the region and around the world . And in the again, tragedy on top of tragedy , I think there was a moment in the fact that Israel is negotiating with the Lebanese government, if we could have actually put some oomph behind that and helped the Lebanese government who does have a military actually disarm Hezbollah , the people of Lebanon might have come out of this better . They are not now. And instead, you've got the Netanyahu government bombing not only the Shia, but unfortunately Druze, Christian, and Sunni villages in the south. And my fear is pushing some of the Lebanese back into the hands of Hezbollah. Yeah, and it sounds like Israel has not agreed to pull its troops out of Lebanon. My understanding is they're occupying up to sort of six miles over the border. I'm just wondering how ongoing occupation is not likely to lead to renewed if not increased conflict. Was that called a softball question? Yes. You know, it's like, yeah, and we've seen, you know, BB's got his own political problems . He's under indictment . He has to maintain this far right agenda. And my fear is not only Lebanon, but what also is taking place. And one of the reasons why I voted against even giving any more bulldozers to Israel . The other tragedy that's taking place is what's happening on the West Bank as the Israeli settlers frankly do awful things on to some of the Palestinian villages. Yeah. Just big picture. I mean, I'm struggling with how to talk about this as a Democrat because I think the best option available to Donald Trump was ending the war as soon as humanly possible for a variety of reasons, but especially because I was worried that this was going to lead to a famine in places like Sudan and mass starvation and death because fertilizer and fuel just wasn't getting through the strait. At the same time, I don't think we should give Donald Trump a pass for launching this catastrophic unnecessary war because all the outcomes he might get through this negotiation process he could have gotten just by talking to them in the first place and not bombing them . So how are you thinking about how to talk about this? Tommy , it is a that is a very fair question . I don't want to Trump gets no credit for this war of choice and where we are. And that doesn't even count the one hundred billion dollars assets we've lost in the region. It doesn't cost the sixty billion dollars of increased gas prices . It doesn't cost the effect of in Sudan and elsewhere . But I'm not going to, you know, but the question is I'm not going to just blast him for ending it because ending it was you know this agreement will not stand the test of any scrutiny . You know, I'm not going to give him credit, but I'm glad he ended it rather than continued where what could have led to even a worse circumstance. So I actually think on this one there is no way even a Trumpian figure can turn this into anything other than what it is is that we America and our friends are in worse place than we were at the end of February. Yeah, agreed with you there. Switching gears a little bit. So Trump tried to install a man named Bill Poulte as the director of National Intelligence. I'd love to hear your thoughts on why you think he made that selection, whether Pulte even would have met the stat utory requirements for the job. I should say he yanked Polte's nomination after Democrats in the Senate said, hell no, no way. And did that selection make you even more worried about how Trump might abuse the intelligence community? Absolutely . Bill Polte is a third generation rich kid who literally got thrown out of his own family's company . Right. And then, you know, taking what would be a relatively benign oversight of the mortgage Fanny and Freddie was able to take private information about Lisa Cook at the Federal Reserve, Adam Schiff, one of my colleagues, and weaponize that . I do think figures in the White House tried to prevent Trump from doing this , but as always the case, Polte or whoever speaks to the president last, he got him he got him put in . And I'm, you know, and this came at a moment in time when we have to reauthorize something called Section seven hundred and two, which is a critical intelligence tool that the Biden's, Obama's, everybody supported . And we've used our leverage to say , you know, we're not going to reauthorize seven hundred and two if Pulty is there. Now, my concern, frankly, is seven hundred and two has got enough bells and whistles and audits that if he misuses that , it will be I think we'll find it. I'm more concerned about the fact that this guy who doesn't even have a national security clearance suddenly gets the keys to eighteen agencies maliciously or not gets exposed to things that could be a huge security risk . And our challenge right now and this goes down the rabbit hole , you know , Trump has finally appointed somebody else , someone who, you know , I've worked with at times. I still need to ask him, Jay Clayton, who was the former SEC head and the current US attorney for the Southern District of Manhattan, you know, I want to make sure he's not going to interfere in our elections and you know basic constitutional rights . But if we delay getting him in, Polte could still serve and there's nothing we can do as an interim for a few days. And you know, I think the Democrats in the Senate will have to decide do we waive to get this through? He will get confirmed. I hope the sooner the later so that we don't have Polte in this office hopefully ever. Oh, so that's why you're trying to fast track Jay Clayton's nomination to try to shrink the amount of time that Pulty could be in that job. Yes, sir. And again, and it's and it's like and the irony and here's the thing , you know, I had huge problems with Tulsi Cabbard Current . She was going to stay until the end of the month. Pulse tried to fire her . And they advanced her leaving date till this coming Friday. If she would just I never say I want to say Gabbard stay, but if she would stay until the beginning of July, we could get it done in two weeks . Whether we get it done in one week will be frankly up to my Democratic colleagues who, you know, they can vote against Clayton. They can, you know, vote against seven hundred two, but please , let's separate keeping Pulty out of the job and the , you know , the renewal of section seven hundred and two? Yeah, but I'm with you on prioritizing keeping Polte away from all of that information. I did want to ask you about FISA Section seven hundred and two though because for those who aren't familiar, this is a provision that lets the intelligence community get information from American telecom companies to turn over the electronic communications of foreign persons located outside of the United States without a warrant. And civil liberties advocates have long been concerned about seven hundred and because of the potential for abuse and also because communications to and from American citizens and those foreign persons are often captured in the process without a warrant and could be reviewed in, you know, by people investigating them, the information. So in the past, I have mostly felt like on balance that Section zero two was defensible for a variety of reasons. It is the thing that national security professionals will tell you is the most important tool in their toolkit. But I'll tell you after the Pulte election, I no longer have confidence that Trump won't use all of these tools to abuse his author ity. So why am I wrong? Why am I wrong that Democrats should fight this? Well, first of all, Section seven hundred two, which has had prior abuses , we've gone through three rounds of reforms . The FBI used to be very callous about how it used it. They went from only sixty percent compliance to ninety eight percent compliance on making sure that appropriate checks and balances are dealt with. Number one, number two , my concern with Palte is so great, not about seven hundred and two , because there are enough reporting that he will at least be discovered. Now that may not assuage you , but there will be an audit trail whereas he could try to get other information that doesn't have near the same audit trail. And then I do think there is a one of the things that took me a long time to wrap my head around this, so you've got two Russian spies. One of Moscow, one in Paris. They're talking about they keep mentioning this guy Tommy . And we don't know from listening whether Tommy is collaborating with the Russians or someone the Russians are going after to see if they can hack into Tommy and actually be a victim. Right. And the idea what this is the part that I don't think people fully understand , if we want to look at who else Tommy has called because we've got Tommy's name, we've got his number , we can only look at , you know , the numbers , but not the content . If you want to look at the and say on an email, like Tommy sent something to Mark , if you want to look at the content, you have to get a warrant . But the idea that you could get a warrant because there is the circumstance that this could be an active live terrorist event and you don't know whether Tommy's about to go do a bomb, the idea that you could get a warrant when you only know the name when twenty percent of the time, fifteen to twenty percent of the time Tommy is the victim, not the bad guy . It is it is at the end of the day, I've come down that this is such an important security tool. President Obama supported President Biden, Trump. It is seventy percent of what we was in the presidential daily brief, but I understand that people have feel the other way and we have added additional requirements that if it's a politician, if it's a religious figure, if it's a media person, you have more hoops, if it's somebody information might be about their constitutional rights because you're out protesting ice. You can't use it there . It will never be for friends like Ron Wyden who is a hardcore civil libertarian, we're never going to I will never satisfy him. I do think there will be at the end of the day, you know, somewhere around fifteen , twenty Democrats that will still say absent the problem because here's my problem . This goes away. God forbid something happens . And Donald Trump then says, We wouldn't have had this incident if we had this tool. And the irony, just one last point on this is, I don't think Donald Trump actually even supports the provision that much because it took until like six weeks, seven weeks before the bill expired that he even came out and formally said he supports it. Right. Well, wouldn't the actual ex kindist ofing authorities not expire for almost another year if there wasn't a reauthorization? That is again the where the rubber hits the road. In twenty there is the ability that this authority is certified once a year and it would be maintained until March . Right. When this came up under Biden , what we heard from the Telcos and this is mostly Telcos and the Googles and the hyperscalers , they said to Biden's security team, if this expires , we are no longer going to participate because we don't have indemnification . This expired on Friday night. So we're now into an area where you know who is right, will they continue to participate or not? One of the telecos today told me, thank goodness , that they will participate. The others, we don't have an answer. And what is insane to me is
This excerpt was generated by Smart Features
Listen to Pod Save America in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.