Evolution and Significance of Speech Registers

Hey, Flora here. we are wrapping up Science Friday's fiscal year on june thirtieth and we could use your support. We're aiming to raise one hundred thousand dollars to close out our budget And with your help I know we can do it If science Friday is valuable to you, if you rely on our reporting to make sense of the world Or even just to give you your daily dose of joy and wonder, please consider going to sciencefriday dot com slash donate to make a donation. It's fast, easy and secure and any amount you can swing will help to sustain us in this critical moment You know, I know I've said it before, but I really mean it science Friday can only continue with your support that scienceRit. com slush donate. And thanks Hey, it's Flora and you're listening to Science Friday. . One shot for the championship Hey got it F point lead, seven points five to go Dereon Fox across. If you watched the NBA finals last weekend, go Ns, It was easy to marvel at the skill of the players But they weren't the only performers putting on the show lefteft wing head off to Wemenamo with two takes a three that even miss is too strong Enjoy it, Nick fan. signed, sealed and delivered your twenty twenty six New York news. The sentence structure, the elocution, the pitch, the petois, the announcers seem to be playing a beautiful game of their own. And it turns out there are rules to this register. Linguists have studied it And even given the speech pattern, its own name Sports announcer Tal Here to break it down is socioolinguist and dialectologist Dr. Valerie Friedland from the University of Nevada Reno. Valerie, welcome to Science Friday Well, thank you and such a fun topic. I'm so excited to talk about it I'm obsessed. I'm just obsessed by it. Okay. so The way sports announcers talk has actually been studied It has, it has. Yes you, it's actually been studied for about thirty five years. The first real study of Sports Douncer register was done by a linguist named Charles Ferguson and his students, which was published in nineteen eighty three. And I remember reading it in grad school and finding it really entertaining then It still holds up to this day. So break it down for me. what are the conventions of sports Announcer talkal There are two different sort of areas that we look at when we look at Sports Announcer Talk, and it turns out to be really, really unique and very different than our everyday casual talk. He found that there were a lot of omissions and simplifications and reductions. So in the example you played, you could hear it. They just sort of use you know Baskets and shots and counts. They don't really use full sentences a lot of the time, especially when they're doing play by play action. There's a little more of the fullness when you have the color commentary and explaining things about players and their backstories. But generally, when you're reporting and narrating the action, it has to be short because it has to be quick They also do let's just spend one more second on a mission. So like they don't have verbs and subjects. How does it play out? Give me a couple more examples. Sure, A lot of times it's the subjects that are deleted because you either know who they're talking about or they'll characterize it later, but it's really the focus on the action. So it would be something like Smith to Johnson which omits pretty much anything about what's happening except where the action was played, right? But if you're in basketball, you're assuming that meant the ball went from Smith to Johnson. So a lot of that relies on the background knowledge of listeners, or another good example would be Banks, the free throw which would be, again, a subject omission, but also a verb omission in some cases. So a lot of times the is verb is what we find deleted. So they just don't even bother with is because you don't really need it. and you're talking fast and you need to get the information out there Another thing you find a lot of that's really not found in normal speech because we would sound like yoda is inverted speech. So where you invert the word order and that's where you basically say the action before the person doing the action. So that would be something like a foul on Wemby when you would say Wemby was foul normally, or it would be something like a rebound by towns Again, you don't talk that way when you're in everyday speech. You would say towns had a rebound. But we do this a lot in sports announcer talkal. We see this in all sorts of different sports. That seems to be one of the really unique characteristics of that genre and makes it very recognizable because it's so different than the way we talk every day. We don't invert our speech like that unless we are Yoda Okay, is this is this basically like the action is first There are probably two reasons. One is the action is the important part, right? You need to describe, if you're a sports announcer, one of your big jobs is describing what's happening And so the action takes center stage The other thing is sometimes in our brains, it takes a while to process how to put everything together. And when you're following the ball and you're reporting on where the ball is going, you're going to be thinking about the action. that will be the first thing your brain is processing. and then it takes a minute to figure out, well, who's doing that action. So we actually think it's because they need a bit of a lag to figure out Well, okay, I followed the ball. I know what's happening with it, but who was doing it? But it also kind of builds suspense and makes it more exciting. So it seems to be a two way street in terms of what it's doing there. pitch or the musicality. L I feel like there is a tempo and a sort of sing songness to sports announcer talk Absolutely. So that's the second area that studies have focused on. and in Ferguson's day, they couldn't really study that because they didn't have the kind of acoustic computational measurements we have today. But now a lot of the more recent work on sports Announcer talkal really focuses on what's called the prosity or the rhythm of that speech. And so it's really based on prettyretty much three things, which is the pitch patterns Pacing and the loudness a lot of times. So what we find is this buildup in a play by play accounting of something. So if you're following the action, the ball's going down the court and they're about to get into the zone What you're going to hear is they start at a slower tone and a sort of low pitch and then every phrase unit where they're describing some play gets slightly higher in pitch, slightly faster in articulation, Fewer pauses as you get to it a device. Right. So that's exactly what you hear. And in fact, a study that was done and this one was on soccer. A lot of the studies have been done on soccer, but they find sort of the same kinds of things elsewhere found that when an announcer announces what they called the climax moment, which is, you the goal being scored or the basket making it, that the commentators and this was men that they studied actually went to a four hundred herz pitch range which is astronomically high and something we don't talk in normally. So the average pitch of a male voice is about one hundred to one hundred and fifty herz So you're talking about a two hundred and fifty herz climb to you know make sure you're bringing that action to the full There are a lot of studies that suggest that low pitch, particularly in males is more attractive and heard as more socially dominant and more physical. So it's actually a very unusual thing to find men speaking at such a high pitch. And so one other study looked at their body movements and their mouth when they were doing it and how they offset the sort of femininity associated with such a high pitch. And they found that instead You know, just doing the high pitch, they often do the high pitch with a bigger body movement. So they're like swinging their arms out and they're making their shoulders really broad and they're opening their mouth really wide, probably to offset the more feminine associations with that high pitch. And the other thing they do is once they get to that goal, not only do they go to a higher pitch, but they slow down that very fast articulation rate And they'll often elongate the vowels and Right? So that's the very recognizable tempo and build upp that we get with sports announcing Well we have a clip of this actually from the World Cup, which is where of course, you know, hundreds of millions of people are also hearing sports announcers right now. Let's hear it I love it. Yeah, so you can hear it. and that's actually called the goal roar In the studies that have been done, it's when a goal is scored, it's called the goal Rar that has name There a name for it. Yes. You know, we linguists like to come up with fancy names for everything. that's the goal Rar You know, we played a clip earlier from Monica McNutt. She's one of the N announcers continontues Two years of the phrase hy to the books So she's playing more of the sports analyst role there, but I also feel like she brings a different you know, a different style and I wonder how these registers evolve and can they evolve They absolutely can. And one thing that we have seen is that certain announcers can be very influential on the future of announcing in that sport. German linguists by the name of Mueller did a study in the early two thousands of German commentating and they tend to use a faster speech rate than the English commentators tend to use simpler sentences than the German commentators and be more sort of variable and excitable in the way they report sports. And he found that that was actually probably because of a single commentator that was very, very popular in Germany who had a very subdued style that was really influential because adored him And that caused sort of the style to become more subdued over time. So I think it's absolutely the case that when we have an iconic sports announcer that becomes very influential, people model themselves off of that commentator and they can end up shifting the form itself Wow. Okay, well zoom out with me, Valerie. I mean why do linguists care about documenting registers like spports Announcer talkal? What's the big picture? You know, I think the thing that people forget is registers are part of everyday life and everything we do. and when we hear someone talk, we often know a lot about them by the register they use. And so we're not studying spports Announcer talk just because it's cool, but it is. We're actually it's a fun thing, right? But it's really just a form of understanding the way that language works to fit the needs of speakers based on not just who we are so where we're born, that determines the way we talk, but how we live. actually alters the fundamental ways that we interact and that alters the way we talk. So you we recognize the way that doctor sound, we recognize the way that lawyers sound We also recognize the way that young people sound, these are all forms of registers, and you can learn a lot about how language changes over time and what makes it change by specific sort of deep dives into types of registers. So it gives us more information more generally about the way that language works and how it interacts with social life Valerie, you have to come back and talk to us about scientist register Oh, I'd love to do that. Yes. There's all sort We can just have a whole day on register. And I would be here for it. Thank you so much for joining us today Absolutely, it was a blast. I' Dr. Valerie Friedlland, professor of linguistics at the University of Nevada Reno, and author of Why We Tal Funny, the realal story behind our accents. This episode was produced by Dee Peter Schmidt. You know, in the podcasting world, a three pointer is considered a five star review. So if you're feeling it, maybe give us some that five star review. It's happening. science Friday I'm Flora Lichman, than Thank you for listing