TE
Tech Brew Ride Home
Morning Brew
Anthropic Standoff With Trump Administration
From SpaceX Pounces On Cursor — Jun 16, 2026
SpaceX Pounces On Cursor — Jun 16, 2026 — starts at 0:00
Are roll batteries the same? That's like asking ev soccer players are the same Take Messi, the most decorated player ever Is there any other player who has achieved that? No, just him. Now take Duracl. Is there any other battery with power boost ingredients inside? No, just Duracl. Remember, goats only trust goats because they're built different. and Messi only trusts Duracl Welcome to the Tech Weride Home for Tuesday, june sixteenth, twenty twenty six. I'm Brian MCelllle. Today SpaceX is acquiring curursor as its stock soared twenty percent on day one of full trading. Anthropic standoff with the Trump administration churned on without resolution. Opening eyeess twenty twenty five spending hit thirty four billion, and open router's fusion claims to be frontier models by using all the models. Here's what you miss today in the world of tech Think you have to build your own search engine scraping infrastructure. Thank again, folks. SRP API can take care of all your search engine scraping needs. It lets AI products access real time web search data programmatically No scraping infrastructure required Their APIs offer structured JSON data from all the top search engines, including Google, Amazon, and YouTube Tch companies already use SRP API to power their AI agents, their market intelligence tools and their automated research workflows See how it can help you and your team, SERP API provides two hundred and fifty free searches per month Go check it out at SRPapPi. com That's SRP SERpapPi d. com And Well hot on the heels of the IPO, SpaceX is moving fast, quoting Techcrunch SpaceX has agreed to acquire AI coding startup cursor in a sixty billion dollars stock deal just a few days after the space company's historic IPO and less than two months after announcing a tie up between the two The deal is meant to help SpaceX's AI division built around Elon Musk's AI company XAI, which SpaceX merged with earlier this year. catch up to the major AI labs. Despite being a centerpiece of its IPO promises, SpaceX's AI division has been in the midst of a restructuring after running into repeated controversies like allowing users to generate nonconsensual deep fakes of women and children SpaceX told investors during the IPO process that it sees an addressable market for AI products worth twenty six trillion dollars roughly equivalent to the US GDP. SpaceX said Tuesday that the acquisition is likely to close in the third quarter of this year Before SpaceX came knocking, Cursor was on track to close a two billion dollars funding round from the likes of Andreres and Horrowitz Thrive and NvIDia that would have valued the AI coding startup at fifty billion dollars, Tech Crunches reported. Musk's company announced a curious deal in April ahead of its IPO, it would either buy Cursor for sixty billion dollars in stock or pay a ten billion dollars breakup fee if the deal fell through end quote You know what? let's check in on how the SpaceX IPO has gone Cing CNBC SpaceX shares climbed twenty percent on Monday, the first full day of trading, following a record breaking debut last week on the NASDAq Roughly two hundred forty four million shares changed hands. Trading volume on Friday topped five hundred million shares, approaching Facebook's debut in twenty twelve. when close to five hundred eighty million shares were traded SaceX on Friday saw its stock closing at around one hundred and sixty one dollars after being priced at one hundred and thirty five dollars per share That put the company's market capitalization above two trillion dollars after the biggest initial public offering in history. The stock added about thirty one dollars on Monday to close at one hundred ninety two dollars fifty cents Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX posted on X on Sunday that the company be able to reach approximately one trillion dollars in revenue in twenty thirty. And I would be surprised if revenue is not greater than one trillion dollars in twenty thirty one, Musk added in a follow up post CFRA on Friday initiated coverage of the stock with a sell rating and a twelve month price target of just one hundred and fifteen dollars, which is a nearly twenty nine percent drop from Friday's closing price CFRA said its view was, quote, due to the company's extremely ambitious growth strategy, elevated valuation expectations and significant capital intensity, end quote SpaceX's capital expenditures in the three months ended March totaled ten point one billion dollars versus four point one billionars in the same period last year. The majority of that went toward artificial intelligence Morning star analyst, Nicholas Owens released a note on june eighth in which he said the firm valued space exit sixty three dollars per share and described the stock as overvalued Pulina Rosakaska, lecturer in finance at Bays Business School, told CNBC's Europe early edition that SpaceX has made a lot of promises, but at some point that will need to turn into cash flow Aside from those phrases about data centers in the orbit, which are high promises, if you're asking for seventy eighty billion dollars contribution, I think that you owe investors a little bit more than poetry, Rozakkaska said The IPO prospectus lacks details on governance or execution risks, she said. So I'm wondering what are these promises based on, Rzakkowska said However, other analysts are more bullish on the stock. New street research initiated coverage of SpaceX with a one hundred and sixty five dollars price target. Can you look at this business? let's say over a longer time frrame than you would over most equities to justify to get to the current valuation? We think you can, James Ratzer partner and senior analyst at New Street Research tolds CNBC Squakbox Europe on Monday But we think you have to be looking out over kind of twenty to twenty five years in terms of a time frame. I think a lot of the building blocks are in place to succeed, but it is definitely a much longer dated equity story than most, end quote Rratzer said SpaceX has at least a ten year lead over competitors when it comes to its rocket launch capabilities When you look at SpaceX and driving what's needed to succeed on Starlink on direct to Cell, orbital data centers, everything has to hinge back to success on launch And you look at what they're building with Starship, the advantage they will have with that, the mass they can put into orbit is a huge advantage, Ratzer told CNBC, and quote And quoting from a different CNBCPiece, SpaceX underwriters have officially exercised their overallotment of shares in the historic initial public offering, bringing the total raise to eighty five point seven billion dollars by the company, according to an investor relations update. on Monday. The additional money raised in the SpaceX overallotment is bigger than almost all tech IPOs on record Underwriters typically exercise the overallotment when the stock rises. SpaceX staff were Green shoes on the trading floor Friday and a nod to the green shoe option. And Musk reshared a photo of that on X told employees gathered at SpaceX's Starbase headquarters in Texas on Friday that he wanted to take the company public now to raise capital for a quote, significant growth phase, end quote AI because of course, there's still the money question running around in the background for everybody. quoting the FT. OpenAI spent thirty four billion dollars last year as the Chat CPT maker poured money into a race to dominate the fast growing AI market ahead of a planned stock market listing. Audited financial figures confirmed by people familiar with the matter show the company spent about nineteen billion dollars on research and development in twenty twenty five and nearly six million dollars on sales and marketing as well as other costs The spending figures up sharply from the previous year offer a rare glimpse into the economics underpinning the AI boom, particularly, opening eyes lavish outlet to build models, fund data centers, and recruit top researchers The numbers, which were first shared with the FT by independent journalist Ed Zitron, suggest open eyes revenues are outstripped by rising costs Open AI only booked about thirteen billion dollars in revenue last year. By the end of twenty twenty five, it was generating two billion dollars in monthly revenue up from one billion dollars a quarter. By the end of twenty twenty four, making it one of the fastest growing businesses in history But heavy spending contributed to a nearly eightfold increase in the net loss attributable to OpAI, which soared from five billion dollars in twenty twenty four to around thirty nine billion dollars in twenty twenty five. A person familiar with the matter said, the large majority of that jump reflected a noncash accounting charge linked to the company's previous structure rather than its underlying operations, end quote And then there is the running undercurrent of price wars and competition and commoditization. Open Router has debuted fusion One of the new type of tools that prompts multiple AI models in parallel, depending on the task you're doing These are growing in popularity. But with fusion, Oen Routers claims it can reach and surpass fable level performance on deep research tasks coding digit Fusion leverages a concept called panel of models. It means that when making a request The system sends your query in parallel to several models, giving each of them the ability to perform web search and fetch operations After receiving all the answers, the judge model compares all of them creating a structured list of agreement areas, contradictions, gaps in information, and valuable ideas each model has contributed thenen the final model creates the answer based on this structured comparison It is all hosted on the server side and can be accessed via one API request with the Model sllug open router slash fusion Open Router used the Draco framework for benchmarking, which is a deep research evaluation suite created by Perplexity. It involves conducting one hundred research assignments in ten different areas such as law, medicine, finance, and comparisons of products. Each assignment is evaluated based on approximately thirty nine weighted factors. Importantly, negative marks will be awarded for wrong answers. Therefore, no model can achieve a high score simply by bluffing or providing a long winded response The results are impressive. The fusion of Fable five and GPD five point five into one panel using Claud Opus four point eight yielded. sixty nine percent in Draco outperforming any individual model that was tested Fable five achieved sixty five point three percent on its own merits. More importantly, even the budget panel did very well in this test. The fusion of three cheaper models, namely Gemini three Flash Kimi K two two point six and Dep Sk V four Pro gave sixty four point seven percent in Draco This performance was better than that of both GPT five point five, which achieved sixty percent and Clauded Opus four point eight, which gave fifty eight point eight percent in separate assessments Open Router also ran an experiment where a single model clawed Opus four point eight was fused with itself as a two model panel. That combination scored sixty five point five percent compared to fifty eight point eight percent for Opus running alone The six point seven point jump. from running the same model twice suggests the synthesis step itself is doing meaningful work, not just the diversity of different model architectures, end quote You know how after a meeting you end up spending too much time trying to piece everything together, going back through notes, trying to remember what was actually said? It adds up fast, but that's where Plaod Note Pro comes in. It's a small AI powered device about as thin as a credit card that captures discussions, meetings, and calls and turns them into searchable notes and summaries automatically. instead of doing work Twice You can stay focused in the moment while Plaude handles organization afterwards This means less time reconstructing conversations later and more time moving things forward Claud's also designed with privacy in mind, meaning Enerprise grade standards, including SC to, HIPA and GDPR compliance. Check it out at plod. Ai slash TBrh. That's PL aU d. Ai slash TBRH and use code TBRH for ten percent off. You want to meet your customers in the most relevant moments, not after their attention is elsewhere. That's why with Twilio, you can transform fragmented campaigns into orchestrated customer journeys helping ensure every promotion reaches the right person on their preferred channel, whether that's SMS, RCS, WhatsApp, or others Twilio helps brands reach customers on the channels they love right when it matters most and all from a single platform. Twilio's API first approach also gives developers and marketers the flexibility to build custom promotional workflows triggered campaigns and dynamic messaging, logic tailored to their business needs. Real time behavioral signals like browsing, card activity and in store activations activate timely, relevant offers to customers, so your brand is always on and always personal. Get started at twilio. com slash TB one. Tillo d. com slash TB one So good, so good New summer arrivals are at Nordstrom Rack stores now. Get ready to save big with up to sixty percent off brands like Rag and Bone, Levi's, Adidas, and Free People. Join the Nordy Club to unlock exclusive discounts, shop new arrivals first, and more. Plus, buy online and pick up at your favorite rack store for free. Great brands, great prices. That's why you rack The latest anthropic Buhaha with the government turns on with no resolution at least at the time of this recording Anthropics says its senior leaders met Trump administration officials on june fifteenth, and both sides are working to resolve things quickly. Qoting Politico. It will likely take longer than a few days to reach a resolution that eases the federal government's Friday action, which had barred Anthropic from allowing non U S. users to access its newest model because of potential security vulnerabilities, a senior White House official said. The official left the door open to the possibility that it can be done quickly. That's up to Anthropic, the official said The company raced to send senior leaders with research and safeguard expertise to DC after multiple hours long calls among anthropic cofounder Tom Brown, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik, and National cyber director Sean Karncross over the weekend, said the officials, who, like others quoted in the story, were granted anonymity to describe the discussions Anthropic head of public pololicy, Sarah Heck was also present on those calls. Monday's in person meetings held by Commerce and Karen Cross's office were more technical and were led by staff, including Chris Fall, who heads Commerce's Center for AI Standards and Innovation, the person familiar with the discussion, said Anthropic gave a presentation to administration officials explaining Anthropic's cybersecurity safeguards and hopes of moving past the restrictions, the administration officials said Representatives from anthropic included Logan Graham, who evaluates and stress test models as part of the company's frontier red team Dave Or, the company's head of safeguards and Nicholas Carlini, its lead security researcher, a person close to anthropics said, and quote, Now there is a growing narrative that Anthropic maybe fundamentally does not get what the government wants or culturally jibes with the government O maybe the fault is specific to certain people inside of anthropic quoting Ben Horn on Twitter This developing story about Dario's failed communications with the White House confirms everything I've ever believed about the enormous power of the sales chad You can be the smartest, most hard wororking, well meaning guy around, but if you can't get people to like you, it's all for nothing When the time comes to send one of your own to meet inside the Hlls of powerower, you don't send the geek squad. You must send the affable beer drinking golf loving sales chad. It literally doesn't matter if he understands the product half as well as everyone else, you send him It's what he was put on earth to do end quote. And then there's a picture of Roger Sterling from Madmen and a quote from Roger Sterling saying you're not good at relationships because you don't value them Anyway, paraphrasing Axios According to a U S. administration official, some White House staff had previously supported closer more constructive cooperation with anthropic, but recent developments have shifted that position. Everybody said Anthropic was a bad actor. Some of us said it was time to give them a chance. Now those people are questioning that. They screwed us. An anonymous source told Axios. According to the news outlet, dissatisfaction with anthropic within the administration had been building for several reasons One was reports that the security mechanisms in the Mhos and Fable models could be bypassed, which the government had raised with Amazon Another was White House concerns over possible access to methos by an organization linked to China Washington believed the company had not treated both risks with sufficient urgency. Representatives of Anthropic reject this account of events. The company says it received direct government authorization to launch Fable and did not refuse to address the issues when they were raised Axios also reports that the Trump administration was dissatisfied with how anthropic interacts with the government in general. A source told the news outlet that the situation could be described as it's like they just speak in different languages, end quote A propo of nothing. I'm going to add this bit from the end of Ben Thompson's latest piece in Stratecary, quote, The entire anthropic origin story is rooted in the founders' belief that openp AI wasn't taking safety seriously enough The company believes that only they can control AI and that because they uniquely care about safety, they are justified in trying to control everyone else, up to and including the US government. Here's the thing about these safety justifications. I think they work because to anthropic, they aren't justifications. The company really believes that they are the only ones who believe in superintelligence and thus are the only ones who are sufficiently concerned about the dangers. That excuses decision after decision, policy after policy, and confrontation after confrontation that to people on the outside look like a bizarre combination of cynicism and naivete The contrast to OpenAI is massive. I think that one way to understand how and why OpAI lost its lead is that in the years following the release of Chat GPT, OpenAI has been at war within itself internally as to what used to be a research lab, suddenly being seized with the burden of being the accidental consumer tech company that it became To the extent openp eye solved that conflict, it was by bleeding huge amounts of talent to anthropic in particular Anthropic, on the other hand, has perfect alignment between talent and mission and business. The company gets to sell to researchers the creation of a machine god with the mantle of being the sort of person who cares about the dangers and is smart enough to navigate them on behalf of humanity That every policy change that falls out of that happens to be great for business is the most beautiful coincidence in the world. I respect this alignment and I fear it I respect it because it is so clearly effective. The closest analogy is probably Apple, which has always framed every self serving action in the guise of doing right by users. Oftten they were So it is with anthropic. What I fear, however, is that it is one thing to have people convinced they know best building a smartphone that I can take or leave. It's considerably more concerning and have them building super intelligence that has the potential to rial or exceed the power of nation states or merely massive corporations The history of brilliant peopleople convinced they know what humanity needs is a sordid one precisely because they have convinced themselves that their intentions are good, justifying actions that very much are not, end quote. The final link in the show notes today is to my launch on product hunt of resumewriting dot comot So you know, I'd love your support there if you had a chance. Talk to you tomorrow
This excerpt was generated by Smart Features
Listen to Tech Brew Ride Home in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.