TH
The Rest Is Politics: US
Goalhanger
America's Global Alliances and Future
From 187. Trump and Xi Face Off: Who Won and Who Lost? — May 15, 2026
187. Trump and Xi Face Off: Who Won and Who Lost? — May 15, 2026 — starts at 0:00
This episode is brought to you by Woop. Woop is one of my favorite all-time products. It's clear we're living through pretty stressful times right now. It's easy to underestimate how much that can affect our sleep and ability to stay focused day to day. Yeah, avoiding burnout can feel like a full-time job in and of itself. Whoop helps with the bit people miss that shows what actually is going on beneath the surface, Caddy. It's a screenless wearable device that monitors your sleep, recovery, lifestyle, and stress. Yeah, and this matters to me. It even looks very elegant. Did you hear that guy's whoop is so stylish that even Caddy Kay will wear the whoop? It's the little gold clasp, I like that. I'm telling you, I had no idea how much my old routine was impacting my health, but since using Whoop and making those small adjustments, I've already started to feel the difference. Better sleep, clearer thinking, even more energy. Head to join dot WHO P .com Hello and welcome to the rest is politics US with me, Katy Kay, and our new superstar, Anthony Scaramucci. Yeah, I was gonna wear my sunglasses, Catty, but I knew you would be critical of that, so I'm just back. I w I wouldn't I love the photos you were starring in your son's movie. Oh my goodness, the t-shirt. For those of you not watching, admit it life would be boring without me is what Anthony blasted all over his chest. After having played James Bond Villa. Before this show started, if you saw the look and the eye roll from Caddy Kay, it hurt. It's so good to have you back. It hurt. Anyway, we thought we would jump in to give you a quick update on the Trump and She meeting that has just wrapped up President Trump on his way back to America, uh, talking about how China has a ballroom. That seems to be the main thing that he learned, uh, and so he should have one too. Uh and what a great meeting it was. He says it was a huge success. Um, and we just thought it was worth a quick run through of what we both made of the meeting. But first, Caddy . Okay, we should probably talk a little bit about the general sale that is now live for our North American tour. How about that? Okay, so you go to the rest ispoliticsus .com and you get your tickets right now. Yeah, we can't wait to see you there, Anthony and I live on tour in October. We're going to be going to Atlanta, Boston, New York, Washington, Minneapolis, Chicago, and Toronto in Canada. We love doing these tours. We love meeting you. We'll take your questions live. So please uh sign up and get those tick All right. We know a lot of you guys are multitasking while you're listening to us. Stop everything you're doing right this second. Go to the restlesspoliticsus .com and buy your tickets. We want to see you. Uh and we're looking forward. I'm excited, Caddy. It's going to be right before the midterms too. So there'll be a lot of things going on. Yeah. And it'll be good to meet our listeners in North America. Okay, let's get let's have a quick listen um, quick, uh update on how this summit went. I do think it was very important that it happened. First time in 10 years, that the two leaders have met. Obviously, a huge amount of tensions around the world. There's been periods in the relationship over the last decade where there has not been very much dialogue at all. So having dialogue between the two leaders of the two great superpowers in the world is definitely advantage. Um they got a deal, it looks like on Boeing aircraft that had been delayed, but maybe not as big as the markets had hoped it was going to be. I think there were some good things that came out of it. Scott Bessant announced that they are going to have talks around AI and AI security , people are getting much more nervous about that because of Anthropic's Mythos AI program that is very good at detecting weaknesses in infrastructure vulnerabil So I think that's a good thing as well. Put that in the tick column. China didn't get the advanced H200 NVIDIA chips. Some people are saying that is an advantage too. But I think uh Anthony Trump went into these talks having made three big mistakes over the last year that kind of dominated the way that the Chinese received them. He launched the tariff war last year, which he had to then row back on because of the Supreme Court, and because the Chinese stood up to him. He threatened to take Greenland, which alienated um most of Europe and weakened the Western Alliance. And then he launched an unnecessary war in Iran, which has also weakened America's global reputation. And that was the backdrop to this summit. And I don't think America came out of the summit. I don't think Trump came out of the summit with any of those huge big announcements of investments into America that he would have liked to have had. Uh, and it's not clear that much progress was made on getting the Chinese to put pressure on Iran to reopen the Straits of Hormuz. They may do that behind the scenes going forward. Big really came out of it, but I just want to take people back. Uh uh the last summer you and I were talking about Trump and his campaign, and then we did a series on Donald Trump. Uh and I and I said to you that President She had Graham Allison's book with him. The title of the book is called Destined with uh Destined for War, uh and he had it with him in April of two thousand seventeen when he went to Mar-a-Lago. And so obviously uh I looked at that. I said, okay, I got to read this book. And so I read the book, passed it on to my kids, et cetera. And I think it's important for people to understand what she was saying, because he's close to Graham Allison, who's the dean of the Kennedy School of Government. And there's another great book. If you guys don't mind, I'll just throw it up here. It's Athens and Sparta by Adrian Goldsworthy. Just came out. I haven't started this yet, but I will. And it's about ris ing superpowers, threatening the existing power structure. And so there's been 16 episodic moments since the Peloponnesian War. And so what did Thuticides write about? He said, Well, Athens and Sparta went at each other. Uh, they were competitive superpowers on the Peloponnese. Uh, they thought the war was gonna last a short period of time. It lasted 30 years, and it destroyed both c ity-states. And so this was a cautionary tale. And Graham Allison basically said since that moment, there's been 16 episodic events, 12 of which have led to war. The most recent one is between our two countries. The United States was rising in the 1920s, but uh the United Kingdom accepted this because same culture, same religion, Judeo-Christian values, same legal system. And so it was accepted. So there was no war. But this is a totally different culture, one-party system versus a democracy, et cetera. And so there's a lot of warning lights on , and she doesn't want that fight. And so I thought it was interesting for him to bring it up. Of course Trump reacted to I thought that was very interesting for him to bring it up because in the context of these diplomatic events, she is not giv en to speaking in what was a pretty unveiled threat, I thought, when he said that were America to intervene on Taiwan or help Taiwan, that could be a very effec tively that could be a very dangerous situation. He didn't use the word America, but it was pretty clear what he meant. But even for Xi to have said that, I thought, at the beginning of this summit, didn't you? I thought it was pretty unusual that he went as far as he did. He stood his ground on Taiwan in a way I think is not in in public in a way that is not particularly common for the Chinese leader. I think he was trying to tell people pretty plaintively a these current structural conditions make a miscalculation on your side catastrophic. I think he was trying to say that. And but I don't think he's ready to attack Taiwan. I I can give a lot of reasons for that. But before I go there, I want you to analyze the tweet that came from the president and was put on the White House feed about Xi's comment s. Because I have an opinion of it, but I'd like to hear yours first, if you don't mind. So this is all the context of all of this, guys, is that the fear in Washington as Trump left for China would be that he would change America's position on Taiwan. Taiwan is important for two reasons. It's the Saudi Arabia of the 2020s, 92% of high-end chips produced in Taiwan, and it is also a symbol, I think, of America's commitment to alliances and democracy, particularly in that region. And what she would have liked is for America, for President Trump to say that it opposes uh actively opposes Taiwan's independence rather than saying that it won't support Taiwanese independence. That sounds like a small linguistic thing, but actually is a big deal in diplomatic terms. We don't know what President Trump said on Taiwan, but we do know, as Anthony said, what President Xi has laid out at the beginning of the summit on Taiwan, which is: look, don't make any mistakes, it could be very dangerous if you do, and making it clear that Taiwan was an important issue. So here is what Donald Trump put out on Truth Social. When President Xi very elegantly referred to the United States as perhaps being a declining nation, he was referring to the tremendous damage we suffered during the four years of sleepy Joe Biden and the Biden administration, and on that score he was a hundred percent correct. I thought it was a remarkable thing for President Trump to write . First of all, he's not criticizing President Xi . Um he's in a way he's treating President Xi a little bit, Anthony, I thought, like the way he treats President Putin. He doesn't want to criticize him. He gives him this credit of saying that he very elegantly referred to the United States by going back to classical Greek history. But then and then he just having a president saying that he very elegantly referred to the United States as perhaps being a declin ing nation. You could stop that sentence there. It's a remarkable thing for an American president to write. And yes, he's putting it all on Joe Biden, but I think it's the first half of that sentence that says a lot about the situation between he's not disputing the idea that America has been a declining power relative to China, which seems to be a growing power. What did you is that the one you're thinking of? Yeah, well that's the one I'm thinking of because see som,ebody from the White House got to him and said, Oh, by the way, he was shitting on America and letting you know that we're in decline. He's on the rise, hence the the city's trap. But there's another thing that happened, which I think is total BS, and I'm gonna call BS , blowing the whistle here, dropping the yellow card or the yellow flag, depending on which country you're in. Okay. Uh Trump says on the way back on Air Force One that she asks him if he's going to intervene if there's a military strike on Taiwan. Okay, he said that on the plane, and then Trump said, well, only I would know that answer. And of course, I dismiss the question. Okay, that is total BS because I'm going to give you several reasons why. But the first one is that is not the way the president of China communicates. He's way too careful. He's a careful scripted interlocutor. He's not somebody that would just flippantly say that. That's Trump being dramatic for the press and being the fabricating showman that he is. Okay, the Chinese readout of the whole situation does not support that. It does say fire and water, it does say there's a red line here. We'd like you to stay away from Taiwan, but I don't think she turned to Trump and said, hey, I if I militarily strike Taiwan, are you gonna back Taiwan? First of all, that would violate decades of entrenched Nixonian Mao strategic ambiguity related to Taiwan. Okay. And so that would be a violation of all of that. And then last piece of this, Caddy, because I know Mr. Trump reasonably well, President Trump reasonably well. The retelling has classical Trump tells. Okay, and just hear me out for a second. There's only one person that knows that, and you know who that is, me . I'm the only person, okay, and I'm not doing his accent well. I gotta get Steve Colbert for that. But but that is a Trump set piece, okay. That is the dramatic, cool refusal. He used nearly the same constru ction when he talks, like you just said about Putin and Kim. So anyway, I don't think that happened. Now he's put them in a quandary because they're not gonna deny . They probably want to from their diplomatic core and from she himself. He probably wants to put out a statement, hey, MF, that did not happen, because it really goes against the whole architecture of the way the Chinese are going at these things. So what is your reaction to that? No, I completely agree with you. Okay, thank you. I'm calling total BS on that. These are very US, by the way. I mean, but look, you know, he also came back on the plane and was berating a New York Times journalist and accusing him of treason. This is David Sanger, who has a very long history of covering international affairs. And he's basically saying the free any free press which questions our success in Iran is guilty of treason. I mean, that's that is an absurd statement. He also said that the New York Times subs criptions were failing. They're not, they're higher than they've ever been. So we know that even on the plane, he's saying things that aren't true, which makes it very difficult to get a real readout. Okay, let's go to a break, and we'll be back with more on the trip. Let's move on. We discuss Taiwan because I think the other important element, and I think the way we judge the success or not of this trip diplomatically is going to be one, does America resume long-delayed large Taiwanese arms sales packages to Taiwan after this? They've been set aside for the visit. Does America resume those? That's going to be worth watching, guys, because that suggests that uh Trump is sticking to the longstanding policy that Anthony is talking about. And I think the second bit of the test of this trip will be after the trip again, does China quietly behind the scenes use its influence on Iran to pressure Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz, which is what America would like it to do? Uh I I 'm actually pretty skeptical. I was talking to a uh somebody who's been involved with um negotiating with the Chi Chinese before, and they don't think that they're gonna actually lift much of a finger to help open the straits, partly because they're getting oil out through other means. We're seeing today the UAE is announcing that it's got, you know, other pipelines that it's expanding. We know the Chinese, the Iranians are also getting oil out, as we said earlier in the week on the podcast , uh, through Pakistan and through Turkey. So I don't know that um they're gonna do much there. They may s they may stop giving the Iranians some of the targeting data that the Iranians need for launch ing missiles and operating their interceptors, that's possible. But do you think they're gonna this changes the situation in Iran very much? I know you've long been advocating for Trump to go to the Chinese and say help us out on the Iran And I thought uh and I have to admit I have to grudgingly admit that you had two fantastic guests on this week. Because you know I get jealous, Caddy K, when you bring on these people. Both Eugene and Michael did a very good job. Particularly the young people. But you said something on the podcast this week. And I said, wow, uh, in addition to your usual insight, I think it's important to reemphasize that they are trucking, shipping , and rail freighting oil. I learned that from an oil dealer. That's very interesting. And I and I give you huge props for that because that's telling you why the Chinese don't have to open that straight anytime so on. They're finding ways to get at the oil, and they want to damage the president more. They want to damage the administration more. Um, I think that they will do some things to help, though, because they want us be seen as a savior to the global economy for Europe and things like that. So it's just not going to happen quickly. Uh but but it's not it's not and it's certainly not going to happen on the time frame that Trump wants that happen on. But let me ask you this question : I told President Xi that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, and he agreed . Okay, is that a bullshit comment too, Caddy Kay? Or you think that uh President Xi agreed to that as well? I I think the Chinese would be quite happy for Iran not to have a nuclear weapon, but I don't hear that exchange having More important is did they discuss China's nucleus did they discuss China's um expansion of nuclear weapons because China has had a massive expansion of nuclear weapons of its own, which would be what it now has six hundred nuclear weapons and American intelligence reckon that by twenty thirty five it's going to equal U S and Russia's nuclear arsenals. That would have actually been the more important conversation. Okay. I didn't I didn't hear any readouts of that. Maybe I mean I'm surprised President Trump has not flown back on the plane saying China has agreed not to expand its nuclear arsenal. That would have been interesting. Okay, I don't think they had that conversation, but that is not my bullshit detection number three. So let me give you my bullshit detection number three. Fantastic trade deals. Well, I'm channeling you. You were trying to make a dog sound, and you know, you sounded like a duck last week. Yeah, that's true. Fantastic trade deals, Caddy K. You think there were fantastic trade deals done, Cadi K? I I have not heard the Chinese interestingly specify any particular trade deals, which I think is in and of itself interesting because the Chinese would probably say what trade deals were done. Donald Trump went to China surrounded by American businessmen who all hope to get investments uh secured during this, but the only one that they've actually, talked about is this one for Boeings, which we were anticipating. President Trump has said that in an interview, he said that they were gonna buy 200 Boeing aircraft. The Chinese don't have the capability at the moment to build their own airliners, so they want to buy Boeings . This has been long delayed as well. It looks like this is going to go ahead, but Boeing's share price was down what, like four percent this morning because the market had expected 500 planes to be bought, but I haven't seen any others. Maybe, oh, access to agricultural Chinese are going to up their access purchases of it looks like of American agricultural products, which is a big deal. The three Bs, Boeings, beef, and beans, soybeans. So it looks like they have said that. But on the other hand, you never quite know with the Chinese when they agree to a deal, does it actually mean the deal is going to go ahead? Because in a previous trip there in 2017, Donald Trump thought that he had got big treat that trade deals, announced big trade deals, uh, and they didn't all materialize. So the announcement of big trade deals doesn't necessarily mean big trade deals, but there weren't very many announced this time around. Despite the agreement they signed with the Trump administration, one about agricultural purchases, they never made those agricultural purchases during the Biden administration. So a lot more to quote Joe Biden, a lot more malarkey coming out of all this. But having said all that, uh I want I want the Americans and the Chinese to get along and I want there to be business and I want there to be a fruitful relationship. And I think it is very, very important for these two systems and these two countries to cohabitate peacefully and with prosperity on earth. And so for all those reasons, you want people getting together versus not getting together. But let me talk about the Hermit Kingdom , which used to be China. My buddy Graydon Carter, who you know, I have deep respect for, says to me, Anthony, are we now the Hermit Kingdom? And what is the answer that getting? Because we seem to have one ally now, which is Israel. That's our ally. Uh, the Europeans, uh, he beats up on them regularly. And I think the Europeans have frankly had enough because you know I go back and forth to Europe quite regularly, meeting with a lot of leaders, spent some time with some government officials in Europe last week. Europeans are not happy with the relationship with the Trump administration. And you know what? They don't want to be an abused spouse. They're moving on and they're thinking about it differently the way Mark Carney is. So So are we the new Hermit Kingdom? We just left the old Hermit Kingdom. Are we the new Hermit Kingdom? I think diplomatically you can make that case. America has under the last in the Trump administration this time around has done a magnificent job of alienating allies, not just in Europe, but also in in that area of the world, in Asia as well. Alienating uh the Philippines, alienating Australia, alien alienating South Korea, alienating the Japanese , all because of the tariff policy, and now because of the Iran War, which has jacked up energy prices enormously in that area of the world, even more than it has for Americans at the pump. But I do think that I was reading the Wall Street Journal this morning, there is a case to be made that you know a lot of the world's still the Chinese are catching up, but still a lot of the world's brain power still comes through the United States and when Donald Trump turns up with uh the bosses of NVIDIA and Apple and SpaceX, it is a sign still of America's flourishing intellectual capacity . An intellectual capacity that the world relies on more than ever because we are all becoming more technologically advanced and more technologically interconnected. So you've got kind of two Americas at the moment. You've got the America that the world wants a part of, which is America's Silicon Valley and tech giants and needs . And you've got the America which is the diplomatically and uh strateg ically unreliable partner at the moment. And I think the question for whoever runs the White House next is: can it bring America's uh security commitments back online in a way that the two are more in harmony with each other. And America once again becomes the country that people want to visit, want to do deals with, want to do business with, that is seen as a beacon of democracy and most critically rule of law, so that countries want to invest in the country. And I think that's that's the question. It's a it's a bifurcated country at the moment. It is. And Caddy , I want to talk about something that was signed in nineteen sixty. Imagine that, long time ago, during the Eisenhower administration. It was a US Japan treaty of mutual cooperation. Okay. It is a binding alliance. And I'm going to read you a quote. In the territories under the administration of Japan, it would trigger a mutual defense obligation. Okay, the the legal foundation of this is roughly U.S. troops in the area would defend the Japanese in the event of an attack. In 1979, it's not a treaty, but it's the US-Taiwan Relations Act. Okay , and this is something that we should also talk about. It's an old uh Sino-American mutual defense treaty, terminated in 1954, re-established in 1979 , and this is the thing. It's never been formalized, but the Japanese have been told by the Americans over 62 years there's a naval blockade of Taiwan, it's a effectively threat on democracies in the area. And so the US, in order to defend you, pursuant to that treaty, would come in and interdict the blockade. Okay, now Donald J. Trump . Uh, even if he knows about all this, I'm assuming Marco Rubio knows about all this because he's our Secretary of State. Uh, what would Donald J. Trump actually do, Caddy K . Uh and remember, we have this security umbrella that's been well documented and adhered to by every American president, Democrat and Republican, strategic ambiguity, et cetera. Okay, go Donald J. Trump, what does he do? Well, Marco Rubio told NBC this week that it would be a quote a terrible mistake if China took Taiwan by force. So you do have the Secretary of State, you're right, understand s this and puts down a marker, which was the most forceful comment that was made from the American side on defending Taiwan during the course of this week. But I don't think that Donald Trump was more ambiguous in his support for Taiw an in Trump one. He's even more ambiguous in his support for Taiwan in Trump two. Meanwhile, they've also had to move assets out of the region. They've depleted their supplies. Um I think the Chinese realize that Trump's commitment to defending Taiwan is a lot shakier than his predecessor's commitment. And the Chinese smell some weakness there . Which is why she can Aaron Powell But before we leave it though, I don't think any of that's gonna happen. I think she's too smart for all that. And I think he still thinks that he can get potentially. The Kuomintang went to visit him first time after 10 years. And I think he thinks he can get it politically without having to do any of that. That's what I think. But anyway. Okay, we're gonna leave it there. And we will be back on Monday as usual. And don't forget, tickets for the tour are live now for general sale. We really hope to see you there. Atlanta, Toronto, Boston, New York, Washington, Minneapolis, and Chicago in October. We're excited. Buy some tickets and ask your questions. We'll answer them live during the shows. These are really fun for us, and it'll be lovely to meet you all. Okay, guys, we'll see you Monday. People miss me, but I missed all of you. I'll just leave it there. So good to have you back. Of our resident James Bond villain. See you next week, guys.
This excerpt was generated by Smart Features
Listen to The Rest Is Politics: US in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.