TH

The Vergecast: Ad-Free Edition

The Verge

Fitness tracking and future outlook

From Why Big Tech can't quit smart glassesJun 23, 2026

Excerpt from The Vergecast: Ad-Free Edition

Why Big Tech can't quit smart glassesJun 23, 2026 — starts at 0:00

Hello and welcome to the Verge Cast, the flagship podcast of NosePads. I'm your friend David Pierce and today on the show, we're going to talk about smart glasses, specifically why smart glasses are such a pervasive idea in the tech industry right now. We've talked a lot about them. We've been covering smart glasses since the days of Google Glass , and there are so many problems and challenges with smart glasses. There was the whole glass hole problem. There are huge tech nological problems with actually making this stuff real. There are supply chain issues. There are display things no one has invented yet. Smart glasses are going to be very hard to do correctly, and even if they're done correctly , it's still very much in the air whether people want them and what they want them for. And yet, all of that aside , a huge portion of the tech industry, including most of the biggest hardware manufacturers are absolutely convinced that smart glasses are the future. So the Virgus V song is going to come on. She has used all the smart glasses, she has reviewed all the smart glasses, and she and I are going to try to figure out why the tech industry can't quit smart classes. It's gonna be great. But first, here's everything else happening on the verge today. This is ninety seconds on the Verge for Tuesday, june twenty third, twenty twenty six. Meta is turning off, at least for now, a program that it created to log everything employees do on their computers. And I mean everything, including mouse clicks and keystrokes, all to use as AI training data. Turns out, a lot of the data being collected was very private and made accessible across the entire company. Seems bad. More broadly, there's been a lot of reporting recently about a huge morale problem at Meta, where everything and everyone is being pivoted toward AI, whether they like it or not. Meanwhile, obviously, privacy and regulatory issues just abound at Meta. In a lot of ways, the Meta brand right now is just not great in general , which makes this next thing, frankly, very funny. Meta launched a new pair of smart glasses today, just called the Meta Glass es. They're cheaper than the Rayband models, which might be the big reason for dropping the partnership with such an expensive brand, and they come in several new fits, including one made with Kylie Jenner. Meta also told V Theirgin's Victoria Song that the comp any is working on better privacy systems for the glasses and on making it harder to tamper with the smart glasses in order to record without people knowing. Of course, Meta is also reportedly working on a facial recognition system for those very same smart glasses. So big grain of salt on all of that. And finally, some very important gadget news. The HP sixteen C an iconic old school calculator that was once a big hit among nineteen eight yer'as programmers is back . There's only ten thousand of them. It's one hundred and thirty dollars , but now it has a faster chip and it can save and load programs. Your move, clog code. You can read more about all of this at thege V.er com. That is ninety seconds on the Verge for Tuesday, june twenty third . All right, it's time to talk glasses. The Verges V song is here. Hi V. Hi. Who are you wearing today, V ? These are the Meta Ray Ban optics style scriber. That was a lot of words in a row. Yeah, that was a bunch of frickin' words I said. So basically , a couple months ago , Meta basically was like, hey , some of you guys have really bad eyesight and prescriptions that are not handled by the original , you know, meta ray band glasses or the Rayband Metaglasses, sorry, the naming convention of these glass es is very infuriating. So they came out with this version of the glasses, which can handle really terrible prescriptions like mine and have a slightly more ergonomic design that is supposedly better is for people's faces like the hinges go outwards. There's modular nose pads . So if you have like a really low nose bridge like mine, you can take this little guitar pick tool that's in the thing and pop them off and put them put a different pair of plastic nose bridges on there. And supposedly the fit is better and that's what I've been testing. So this is very exciting. Yeah, especially for my prescription. Like I got a little and card it's like gave we you the good one point seven four high index lenses. And I was like, oh, I can tell because the glasses aren't poppin out on the other side like they usually are for me. So that's nice. Yeah. Yeah, this is good news. So I've brought you here for a specific purpose today . We talk a lot about smart glasses on this show. I think in particular, we have spent a lot of time talking about the challenges of smart glasses and all the reasons it's going to be very hard to pull them off all the reasons. They are a total surveillance, hellscape, all of the reasons. None of this might work. I want to go all the way to the opposite end of the spectrum today , because throughout all of this , I continue to be struck by the fact that everyone in tech has decided that this is going to work. And I think it's pretty unusual actually to have this many companies this aligned on a particular kind of project , even as we look at AI, right? Like everybody has different ideas about AI things everybody thinks it's going to be smart glasses. And so what I want to do with you is I have found ten different things a pair of smart glasses can do. I didn't prepare you for this. We're just going to do this off the top and it's going to be great . I have ten things and you're going to you're going to give me a one to five score for each one. Five being like, this is a killer app for smart glasses. This is why we're doing this. This is smart classes. One being like, nobody cares, this is not long run important. But the overarching question here is basically like why can't tech quit smart classes? Do that sound reasonable to you? Yeah, that's that sounds reason able me. There's a lot of reasons why, but let's get into it. Okay I have ten features for you and then at the end you get to fill in any gaps that I missed . This is in no particular order . The first one is navigation, basically like heads up navigation through the world with directions that you can see . One to five, how important is that as a smart glasses feature? I think it's a three because if you are traveling and you're in some place you don't know, that's great. It's like a super great use case when I went to Italy and I had the meta yes, the Meta Rayband I have to like buffer for a second when I'm talking about their glasses just because they changed the naming conventions. But when I had the display glasses with me in Italy and we were trying to get our way to the Vatican Museum, it was great. I had these heads up directions, the it's not like New York City where you have a grid layout and it's just all you need are your cross streets and you can get anywhere just fine. You don't need to really have a great sense of direction. Italy is not that. Rome is not that. There's a lot of twist little windy roads there, so it was actually really helpful and it was a great little experiment because my family , my in laws, they had their phones out with the Google Maps and I had the glasses on and I was just zooming. I was going fast, I was weaving my way through things. I had my heads up. I was like, oh, this is fantastic. This is great. But then I come back home to New York City and places that I know and I never use that feature. So it's one of those things where it's like, if you travel a lot or you're just someplace you don't know very well , what a game changer to have it, especially if you're like in an older city that doesn't have logical grid shape navigation . But if you're somewhere at home , you know, where you know the streets, well, you're never turning that on, right? Why would you do that? So it's sort of like to me, a great use case for when you're traveling, but you know, these glasses are things that Big Tech wants you to wear every day. So it's a nice to have, not necessarily a need to have, but when you have it, super great in a pinch, especially if you know, like in Italy, the traffic laws are a suggestion and there's always someone on a moped just going real fast and so you need that awareness about you That was the time or the navigational features. I was like, oh yes, love this. Super great. And they all have different ideas about how they want to do it, like when I did the Android XR demo. One thing I really liked is that when you look down , you can kind of have a map orienting you where you are. So even, you know, maybe when I am able to have an Android XR pair of glasses to test in New York City, when I get out of a subway and I'm disoriented about where in my grid I'm looking, I can look down and kind of that automatically. And that's by the way is a demo we've been seeing for like a decade. They'll like walk out and it'll tell you what direction to turn is A terrific idea and be a very old idea about very old ideas might be. And it's just like I would love to have a pair of glasses that actually does that in the wild outside of a controlled demo just to see how much would I actually use that? Because I'm always getting out of the subway and going like, oh, my eyes are garbage. Time to use my phones, gazillion time zoom to see what the street says over there. Okay, that's the wrong direction. I just walk until I can see the street sign and then realize I've gone the wrong way and then I walk to the other street sign . Take out your phone, find the closest street sign, just zoom in too far and then and then you'll be able to tell. So these are like things that I've done as someone with garbage eyeballs. Yeah, so three feels right to me here. It's like, yeah, feature you will use if you buy a pair of smart glasses, probably not the reason you will buy smart glasses. Yes, in theory. I buy that. A nice to have. Sure, sometimes, yeah. Okay, thing number two, big ass monitor for your computer. This is gonna be a two, but I want to caveat this here. Honestly, two feels generous. Two feels generous. I'm gonna caveat this. I'm giving it a two because there is a certain subset of people who I've interviewed for various things who are just like, this is the number one reason for XR ever . We call these people who bought Vision Pros and refuse to feel bad about it. That's what those people are called. Correct. Yeah. And you know, I've been in situations where I've used a pair of XR glasses and been able to have a second monitor on a plane where, you know, if you use a second monitor often and you're on a and you're on a place where all of a sudden you're like, oh crap, I have I only have thirteen inches of my MacBook Air to work with. How dare anyone expect me to work with such limited screen real estate? And you know, there are people who have called into the hotline who have been like, I need my second monitor in a coffee shop. What do I wear? And then I tell them that the XR glasses exist . There is a very loyal, passionate subset of people who will absolute ly buy a pair of glasses for this reason and this reason alone. Hence I give it a two . But when we talk about the general public, there are a couple on this list that I think are going to be either a one or a five and nothing in between. But like some people they will be the reason they buy the thing and for other people, utterly irrelevant feature. And I think I think this goes on that list, but I think it is mostly irrelevant God speed if this is the thing that you want out of your smart glasses. I don't think this is for most people. This is not for the I want to say ninety percent of people, but for the ten percent of hyper passionate people who love XR who think this is the ultimate way to experience productivity in a coffee shop. Yeah, they're going to one hundred percent buy the first pair of smart glasses that allow them to do this. And honestly, prefer that for your plane work than a vision Pro . Just saying like have we seen people with Vision Pros on planes in the wild frequently? No, because it's heavy . So yeah . Some day I'm going to reveal my take about VR on planes and how it's a terrific idea and your mind is just gonna melt. But today is not that day . Thing number three, camera, just pure hands free on your face camera for taking pictures and video . Four. Okay , because again, we're going to have a subset of people who are being like, if I see a camera on your face, I'm gonna punch you. And I will say I will say that when I go out into the world sometimes I take my little bangs and I go like this over the camera so that people not because I'm using it in that way I'm trying I try to be very mindful about when I'm using these devices, but because I just don't want people to notice that I'm not using it, but that it has the potential to be used and I'm just using my side bang cut to like slightly obscure the camera because one, if the camera's on, I'm going to ruin the shot anyway with bangs. And this is actually why I've had a lot of higher cuts with bangs recently because it's great for testing , not only camera placement and how often I tilt my head in these photos, but yeah, but I will say that when I wear these at home , I get really great David Attenborough level cat videos. And I love that. And there are so many people I know who their main reason for that is in the privacy of their own home when they want to have really great candid videos of their kids. This is something they really enjoy doing . Content creators , I have seen some like recipe creators use meta ray band glasses or Rayband metaglasses, whichever model they have while they're doing POV shots of like recipes and doing I have seen some of that pop up in my TikTok feed and obviously some commenters are always disappointed in that creator for submitting to surveillance tech, whatever, but you know there are certain public or in the privacy of your own home where you can feel a little more comfortable with those things, where the camera as a content creation tool is very popular . And then you have accessibility communities where like we've done Virgincast on this before with a low vision and blind communities for some of them, they feel that the ability to have the real time AI, like the Be My Eyes feature with these glasses is super helpful for them to be , you know, just kind of living more independent lives where they can get help via the camera as to what they're seeing, what they're doing . So it is a very powerful tool, which is why I give it a four as the reason why a lot of people are gonna buy it, but it doesn't get a five because it's gonna be a reason why some people don't buy specific glasses as well. So I've heard that from people. That is fair, yeah. Yeah, yeah, I think to the extent that there is going to be a market for smart glasses without a camera, I think you're probably right that it's not, it is not like the killer app for these things. It's not the killer because it is going to convince a lot of people not to buy it or to buy one that doesn't have a camera. So I think the solution and I don't know, this is free. I'm putting this out here. I think the solution is some sort of physical shutter or a modular camera where you can stick it in and out so that when you're in a situation where you're like I don't want to make people feel uncomfortable. I can actually put a physical shutter or something over the camera to just visually signify that I'm not being a creep right now. You know, like a version of my bangs that's not so finicky or whatnot. I think that would be a really smart solution. There's probably reasons why they haven't done that, but I'm just saying. We need free idea. Beanies that you wear that have little flaps that come down. Yeah, or like you know with your webcams on your computer where you just have a thing where you go , it's it's not on. Like, yeah, I feel like that would be super a easy thing to do to make other people feel comfortable. I don't know why we haven't done that yet. So yeah, I agree . All right, let's keep moving. Thing number four, and you kind of mentioned this already, and I think this is actually a quick five and we can just move on is accessibility stuff. And this is the sort of be my eyes stuff. It's live captioning, which comes up a lot, but the idea that basically for people who are low vision or have hearing difficulties , these are an accessibility thing. And I think you've reported on this enough to know that this is very much a killer app for people, right? Like for people who need this easy, huge victory. Yeah, huge victory. The only thing is that they need to commit to supporting it because there are people within that community who are worried that oh like in three years they're just gonna take this tool that I've come to rely on away but like fair worry fair, fair worry but like you know, easy five for me . Yeah. Okay, cool. Next one, music and podcasts, just basically like smart glasses as headphones. Five. Like really it is it is higher than camera . Yeah, because there's no there's no downside really to it. I get to have my situational awareness. It is actually easily the feature I use the most . So like I'm in a house which is a very vertical narrow house and sometimes I have to yell to my spouse or something or they're yelling to me and if we have our airpods in, we just can't hear each other. So then we have to track up three floors of things and be like I've been yelling . You can hear me and it's like oh s,orry I got my, really great noise canceling , whatever's on. So when I'm doing laundry and I'm just listening to an audiobook or a podcast and I have these on where they're not sunglasses indoors. I just use this and I can hear things going on when I'm outside on a walk and there's my agro neighbor going fifty in a residential area in or giant range rover. I can keep my awareness and not turn into a pancake while I'm walking about listening to my music and audio books. The only time is not great is if you're on the subway, yes, you are going to have to pull out your AirPods or whatever you use at that point, but I use the audio all the time for my podcast and all of that. It is like the number one uncontroversial feature that I use these for. I'm with you actually. And the meta ones in particular are like a sneakily great phone call device. Yes. They sound good. The mic is pretty good. My only caveat is that I often have to do this when I'm on calls because of my low nose bridge. You go full librarian? I go full librarian because the way my nose is shaped and I even have the low nose bridge modular things that I put on here. I still on some sound on some phone calls I've been told I sound muffled and I'm like, hold on, let me just how do I sound now? And they're like, you sound great. So that is one my one feedback. But for most people who don't have a very low profile nose, you probably won't ever have that issue. So yeah. Okay . So that's a five for headphones. That actually makes me happy because I'm with you in that that is my single most used feature , but I kind of controversial. That was just me. Yeah. So that makes me happy. And actually related to this one. The next one on my list is communication , like calls. Video calls is a thing that has been demoed since like Google Glass , but basically just any sort of communication tool , phone, video, whatever you want on smart glasses. One to five . Three just because I don't think they have tweaked what the best use of for it is I have the non display version on right now. I get a text on my phone. It's like someone has texted you and then I have either have to like out loud say that or pull out my phone. So it's not really a replacement. The spoken communication stuff is awful that way. It's not great about being in public . So the vast majority of what people will probably buy at this point is the model that I'm wearing, which is just mostly audio. So when it's a mostly audio experience, it's not that different from a smartwatch. And a smartwatch can be a little more discreet and easy to interact with in my opinion. But when we get to the display glasses at a price that's affordable to people, I do think being able to see a calendar notification, being able to see who texts you and what very quickly, very discreetly is going to be much more of a reason. We're just not fully there yet that people can have. And I also am very mindful of once you put the display in, you just inevitably are always looking off to the side every so often and people just feeling a little disrespected when you do that a little too often. So I'm not sure how that will play out in the long term. Which is why I say three because I think it could be a very good use case, but not sure how people will feel long term. Are you at all compelled by the idea of the like first person video call that you can see what I see as we're on a FaceTime or whatever together? That's like a sometimes thing for me. I don't think that's gonna be, I think that makes way more sense in an enterprise or a workspace. So it's sort of like, hey, I'm trying to fix this thing. I don't know how to do this. Call my father in law being like, I don't know how to fix my toilet. Yes, that's gonna be great. That's awesome. This by the way, our killer app for smart glasses in general is like in general see instructions next to you as you do stuff, remote support, like all this stuff, there's a reason Smart Glasses have found genuine like honest to God product market fit in like factories. That's a real good thing. And I think you're probably right that this works there better than anywhere right now. Yeah, it's going to be a it's going to be like the heads up directions where when you need it great. I have I have a use case for it. I am sure many husbands be using it when their wives are like, I asked you to get Holland e sauce. I can't find it in the grocery store and then the wife is just like, I'm just gonna give you directions, turn left here, go there. Yes, I think that'll be a use case, but it'll also be a sometimes thing. You're not going to buy it just so you can do that. But when you need it, it'll be cool. That sort of thing. Okay , I buy it. Okay, so far we've talked through navigation , big ass monitor, camera, accessibility, what I would just call headphone mode , and communication. The next one on my list is kind of next to communication, which is notifications and reminders. And this becomes , I think, another question of what matters in audio versus what matters when there's a display in front of you . But again in terms of like why big tech can't quit this idea , you do see pop up notifications in the corner of your vision in every single one of these demos and concept videos . But for people who might someday buy these, is that is that a killer app? One to five. What do you think ? That's a four . And the funny thing is that I just got a not ification through these glasses saying that my best friend had texted me . And that's good . That's good. That is cool. But the reason why I don't give it a full five because I do think there are a lot of people who would love a discrete way to be like, oh, I got notified while I am heads down and doing stuff is that we haven't found the tweak yet of how to filter these notifications in a way that's truly useful because I know for a fact that my best friend probably just texted me some TikTok video of something and that that can wait . And that, you know, it kind of distracted me from this thing that I need my full focus on right now, which is doing a great Virgin cast . So in some ways, yes, great. Love it. Gonna be super helpful when I can see, oh, crap, I have a meeting coming up soon. I got to go and do all that sort of stuff. I think that'll be great for a lot of people. But the notification w is just why we don't want to look at our phones anymore too . And you can't not see it in front of your eye or in your ears . So I think for some people, in some cases, a for it is a very powerful use case, but what they haven't figured out is how to have intelligent notifications . So ones that you really it's just everything at the moment and you don't always need everything coming through on your glasses. You just don't don't, you want that . It's going to make you super tired of it long term. So I think they need to do a little more tweaking and fine tuning and giving you more control over all the different types of smart glasses for it to be a super killer use case, which is why it's only getting a four. Yeah, I think I think you're right. I remember I had a conversation with a very senior Google executive like ten or eleven years ago now . And what he told me is that the single hardest problem for all of this is A , understanding as the product maker that most of the time your job is to not be visible at all, that in fact, your AR glasses should be nowhere most of the time . And that B , figuring out the when you've hit the level of actually putting yourself in somebody's face is so different than the level of buzzing somebody's phone in their pocket that it is going to take a long time to figure out and boy are we not anywhere close to anybody actually solving that problem? Nowhere near. But I think you're right that like done correctly , that becomes a killer app for this thing. But that done correctly is a big giant ask. They pitch these as AI glasses and what I want the AI in these glasses to actually do is know when I'm in a meeting and when to silence notifications and then maybe surface the notification notification that it reads as urgent or not urgent so it can decide for me when I'm in a thing whether I actually need to know it at what moment. And like that, they can't do that. They can just push it. All they do is they push it. So you know, we're not at the point where it m akes where it's killer. It's just another phone on your face kind of situation. Agreed. Okay, I'm glad you brought up AI because I have three AI ones for you in a row. Let's go. AI thing number one, translation. Another one that comes up in all of these demos, the idea of like you and I are talking and I can either see or hear you speaking in another language in my language in real time. Two . It's it's a better in theory idea than it is in practice for me thus far because one, how often are you in a situation that you need things translated? There's going to be some people who travel a lot love that . There's going to be people in multilingual families in which case how good are you at doing pigeon because my family speaks Conglish and they do things to these language that are very creative and I think has thus far really tripped up these AI translators that I've tested . And then there's just like the issue of, again, I was in Italy. I put these transl ating on . And when you have everyone in Italian yelling around you mixed with English, it doesn't know who to translate when. That is a thing that's really tough. So right now these live AI translations with these glasses and other devices. They're great for when you're in a quiet place, one on one with someone. Again, I was on a I wrote about an optimizer. I was on a train with this really cute Chinese grandma and she only trusted like, I don't know why, well, I know why I look at my face. But she went up to me and she's like, I'm so afraid I'm not gonna get off the thing. And we were using these AI translators. And that was a really wonderful experience because she was so scared and I was able to help her, even though I'm not the right kind of East Asian for her in that particular experience. So I think once in a while it'll be great , but it won't work quite as well as you want. And there's a lot of technical challenges too right now. I think I agree. It's a terrific demo more than it is like a really sort of everyday mainstream product . And it probably will be that way for a while. Everyday life is very loud. We do horrible things to language that the AI has a hard time keeping up with, so we'll have to see. And actually, in a weird way, the behavior of like holding my phone up to my mouth while I talk and then holding my phone up to your mouth while you talk is actually kind of solves a bunch of those problems in a way that's like ambiently listening with my smart glasses doesn't . It feels awkward, but it weirdly kind of works. Every time I've tried that, it has worked better than work s because we understand, oh, I have to talk slow. I have to be more patient . Where if they don't know and it's just happening and it's a one way translation where you understand what they're saying, you're chewbakaing the experience . Yes. Yeah . Chubacca is a verb is a new one. I really liked that very much. That's my life. AI thing number two, facial recognition, AKA Neil I Patel's ideal dystopian hellscape. The thing where you're walking along and it pops up a thing over their head that says, This is the person you met two weeks ago. This is a one. This is like a this is like get this out of my face . I think the vast majority of people do not want to get this out of my face. The only time that people actually want this is like when you are at a mixer or a meeting and you want to be saved the zero point two seconds of embarrassment when you're like, oh sh oot , this person knows me and I don't know them. But honestly, that's easily solved by being a human and saying hi. Can I tell you my theory about this feature? Yes. I think this feature should only exist thirty minutes at a time, maybe not even maybe like ten minutes at a time. And it should cost five hundred dollars and it should be this should be like some charity should create this and it should give the money to a good cause and you should be able to very briefly turn it on to solve this one specific problem that you're talking about. And it should be prohibitively expensive. But if you're like, I am not going to get this job if I don't remember this person's name. It's worth it to me to turn this on for three minutes and I'm going to do it , I'll allow it. This is like an ambient thing, I think, is just a complete societal nightmare . But like, let's let's monetize this in insane ways. I'm all for it. I'm gonna like kind of riff on what your version is. And I think geofencing. So like if you could geofence this feature to like a conference hall or let's say you're working with dementia patients who can't remember people . I And think that 's one use case that people sometimes quote facial recognition in these glasses for. Like, let's say you're a dementia patient. You need to remember who people in your family are. You can geofence your house for a certain amount of people in program who it's supposed to recognize. If you have heavy guardrails for specific places and or specific like in hospital, maybe you're okay in a certain treatment ward for dementia patients and you can geofence the features so that it only works within that specific place . I think maybe you could make an argument for it. I also like the idea of it being like a two way buddy list situation where like you sign up to remember me with your glasses and I sign up to be remembered by your glasses. That becomes like a more give and take situation that works. So like, yeah, at a teeny, tiny sort of person to person scale there is something here as a like overall feature of these devices. I'm with you, one out of five. Can we give a zero like a zero out of five I just know that like I've had people in my DM's just screaming that this is not something they want and totally I feel like it's obvious why. Nor should they? It is Neili Patel's most monstrous take . It's my humble opinion . All right, next one, last AI one is just sort of overall AI interactions. Everybody wants you to use these things to talk to chat GPT, talk to met AI as the like sort of ambient companionship of an AI bot . One to five. What do you think? It's a two. There's always going to be someone who really argues or comes up with a really creative way. So I'm giving a like an allowance for someone who finds a way that I'm not thinking of in this moment that is creative, that is useful and that is helpful . But by and large , I fundamentally disagree that AI is the killer use case for these things just because, when I 've used it outside of very heavily guardrailed demos, frickin' useless. I've taken these glasses and looked at a pile of books and been like, hey , these are my books. I'm trying to figure out what to read. What do you recommend? And I go, I don't have an opinion. Well, thank you . Like that is an actual dem like actual thing that I've tried with these glasses where it was like, I don't have an opinion. You should just read what interests you. Well, thank you. I bought the book because it interests me. I'm asking for recommendation. I will say we had friends over a couple of weeks ago and the one of them went to the wine store, pointed his phone at the shelf of wine and said, Which one of these should I buy to go with? I think we were having pizza. And it recommended him like a pretty good bottle of wine and he came and he was so proud of himself for having used AI to successfully solve this problem. And it was good wine. And I was like, A , like genuinely neat AI feature, B erfectly fine on your phone. Like we've solved no new problems by offsetting this to smart classes . Or it's just like one of the suggested dem os that I've done in the past is like open your fridge and ask it to suggest a good recipe for you. I opened my fridge, wilting vegetables on the left , sad other things on the right. And it was just like you, could make scrambled eggs. Aw, thank you. Thank you. Yes, scrambled eggs. That's what's on a shore. You know, so I think the correct answer there is like, V, get your life together. Love, Meta AI. Yeah , or you know , my spouse is a super car person. I get dragged to car events. A lot of the testing I did with these for identification of objects was going up to cars and going, what am I looking at? What model of car is this? Giant Ferrari logo, right? I'm like, even I know a Ferrari logo at this point and it's just like, oh, that's a sports car. Can't tell you which sports it c isard, not very great at logo recognition. And at that point, I'm like I don't see the point Yeah, I'm eager to see the ways in which that stuff gets better with camera stuff in particular . But right now that as like an ambient thing just doesn't really seem to work. Unless you're a museum and you've programmed these glasses and instead of like those crappy little audio tour things where you have to punch things in. You give them a pair of glasses, they look at a thing, and it pops up what the thing is. I tried doing that in Italy, but again, the Pope did not have holy WiFi at the Vatican Museum. It worked for one Belvedere torso and the rest it was like, here is a Renaissance butt that you can look at. So hope Leo, if you're listening, and I know that you are , fix this for V for next time. All right, I have one more for you, and I saved this for last for you in particular because it's fitness tracking. This is this is like a sort of niche thing right now , but I will say still to this day the nicest thing you have said about a pair of smart glasses was about the Oakley, what they call the vanguards , which are fundamentally fitness based smart glasses . So fitness tracking as a killer app for smart glasses, one to five, what do you think? Three because it depends on the implementation . I think let's assume if it's good , are we looking at like four or five? Like does this become a reason people a lot of people buy smart glasses? I think it's a reason why people buy might sports smart glasses, just very specific use case sports smart glasses where you can swap , which is an idea that the vanguards have where you swap the lenses for the sport that you're doing . And then you can get like cues like, oh, you've done a mile. Here's your cue or your heart rate training, your heart rate's too high. Here's a visual cue in here. Like slow it down. Like for those elite at or like very intense athletes, I think that could be really useful, especially if you give heads up navigational directions where they can be like, oh, I know where I'm going or I know where I'm running, here's my route. That I think becomes a very useful and powerful training tool but for the, average person who's just like, I'm gonna run my local five K. You don't need that. Don't you're good. These are for the people who like to email me saying actually garmins are better than the Apple Watch . Like if that's you, this is for you. If that's you, I actually think you're really gonna enjoy the Oakley Bangards. Like I really enjoy them when I'm just training. And I could imagine them being, you know, runners, they're they're always doing the black and they're like mile one , mile two. Mile three . Like if that's you, I think you're gonna have a good time with with these Oakley Meta vanguards and having time lapses that you can share on Strava. Like that's you're going to love them. They're expensive, but you're going to love them. But it's a specific use case and it makes sense. And it's a tool that is very clear. It's a it's like a it's like a, I don't know, this is an idea I just had. What if we had smart glasses that are made for specific use cases that people are like, oh, that totally makes sense. Like content creation glasses that you use for that specific purpose or exercise glasses, for that specific purpose? Well that's what I was just going to say because I think everybody wants smart glasses to be like the smartphone in that it is sort of the one device you have for everything. And the advantage that the vanguards and things like them will have is that it is a specific thing for which people buy specific gear. And there's nobody feels bad taking off their running sun glasses at the end of a run, right? Like it is you bought it for that purpose, you use it for that purpose and then you take it off. And that is such a lower bar for success than like put your prescription in, use them all day every day for the rest of your life. And worry about battery life all day for the rest of your life. You wear those metaglasses, the Oakley ones, I become Lady Gibroni. It's a different persona and everyone looking at me is just like, oh she's just doing that thing. Yeah . Good for her. But yeah, it's Lady Gaboroni parentheses complimentary . Yeah , yeah. I mean, I look I look like a certain type of person when I put those on and that's fine. It's it's great. Yeah. That's what you're doing. That's that's Lady Gabroni is a vibe All right, so it seems like we're at the point now where we've gone through this whole list and the most basic use cases basically headphone mode, camera , simple sort of notification stuff, fitness tracking, like there's a handful of things that have potential to get there, but right now it is still the simple stuff that is the best reason people might go buy a pair of smart glasses. One percent . Nothing . All the big ambitious stuff about this kind of replacing your phone , not I so'ldm on it yet. I don't think they found it's a bunch of little things that are nice to have when you have them, but as an overarching one big thesis , one, I don't believe AI is it. And two , we're not there. I don't know if we'll ever get there. There's very it's a very possible chance that Meta will ruin it for everyone by being Meta before we ever get there. But But you know with niche tech it has to fit into your life and the things that actually fit into your life naturally and organically are the listening to your podcast, the taking a picture of your cat or your kid and the easy stuff. That's the stuff that people like. And that's the reason why the most basic versions are the ones that sell and not the ones that are who'sy, what'sy, everything is floating in my vision. So totally yeah. All right, that's my list. It was actually eleven things, V I'm sorry, translation was originally a sub thing of communication, but once we started talking about AI I just made it its own thing. So those are eleven things. If you think there are killer apps that we missed, if you think there are other cool things that people are going to want to do with smart glasses, hit us up, call the hotline, eight six one, send us email Virgas to Virgo. com. Yell at V on social media . We love hearing from you. Don't yell at me on social media. Don't yell at me. Politely give me your comments and I will respond in good faith. There we go. We love to hear it. Vee, thank you for being here. Appreciate it. All right. All right, that's it for the show. Thank you to Vee for being here and thank you as always for listening. Like I said, if you have thoughts about smart glasses, if you have things that make you absolutely not want smart glasses, if you think you have things that you will buy them for that we didn't talk about, we want to hear from you. The hotline is eight, six, six, version one, the email is Virgast at the Virgot com. Send us anything and everything all the time. We truly, truly love hearing from you. And as always, the best thing you can do to support everything that we're up to here is go to the Verge. com slash subscribe and subscribe to the Verge. You get ad free podcasts, including this one, you get all of our exclusive newsletters, you get all of our coverage of smart glasses, V's working on a bunch of really cool stuff, has done a bunch of great coverage. We'll put it all out there for you. Go get it all at Verge. com slash subscribe. Thank you in advance. And thank you to everybody who subscribes. Verse cast is V aerge production and part of the Fox Media podcast network. This show is produced by Eric Gomez, Brandon Keefer, Travis Larch, and Aaron LaCaso. We will see you tomorrow. Rock 'n' roll

This excerpt was generated by Smart Features

Listen to The Vergecast: Ad-Free Edition in Podtastic

For listeners, not advertisers

All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.