This Is Why
Sky News
Why grooming gang ringleader cannot be deported
This episode of This Is Why examines the complex legal and social challenges surrounding the release of Shabir Ahmed, the ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang. Despite being stripped of his British citizenship and convicted of horrific sexual offenses against vulnerable minors, Ahmed cannot be deported following his prison release. The podcast explores why this has occurred, highlighting the intersection of public outrage, legal frameworks, and human rights legislation. Legal expert and journalist Joshua Rozenberg joins the discussion to clarify the specific provisions of the Immigration Act 1971 that prevent Ahmed’s removal, noting that long-term residency often creates legal exemptions. The conversation moves beyond this individual case to address the broader difficulties in deporting foreign-born offenders. Rozenberg explains the role of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects private and family life, and how this is frequently utilized in legal appeals to block deportation. The episode provides a nuanced look at the tension between public safety, the desire for accountability, and the practical and ethical constraints imposed by both domestic law and international agreements.
Updated Jul 4, 2026
About This Episode
He’s a convicted child rapist who’s been stripped of his British citizenship. But the ringleader of a notorious Rochdale grooming gang – released from jail this week – cannot be removed from the UK.
Shabir Ahmed was sentenced in 2012 for multiple counts of rape and sexual offences against girls as young as 12. But provisions in the Immigration Act 1971 mean he is safe from deportation.
Politicians from all parties – including prime minister-in-waiting Andy Burnham – are calling on the Home Office to take action. But what legally can be done? And how does the law actually work?
Niall is joined by lawyer, journalist and legal affairs commentator Joshua Rozenberg.
Warning: today’s episode contains references to grooming gangs, rape, sexual abuse and coercive control.
If you have been affected by any of the issues Joshua and Niall discussed you can call The Samaritans, free of charge, on 116 123.
Have you got a question for Niall? Email us: why@sky.uk
Listen to This Is Why in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
More Episodes
Why has Nigel Farage resigned as an MP?
In this episode of This Is Why, the host and political correspondent John discuss the dramatic decision by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage to resign as the Member of Parliament for Clacton-on-Sea, effectively triggering a by-election. This move follows ongoing parliamentary investigations into Farage’s financial arrangements, specifically concerning donations from a crypto billionaire and assistance provided by a convicted money launderer. The discussion explores whether Farage’s resignation is a strategic attempt to frustrate these investigations or a calculated political gamble designed to bypass parliamentary scrutiny by seeking a fresh mandate from his constituents. The hosts analyze the tension between Farage and the media, his narrative of victimhood, and his consistent claims that he has done nothing illegal. Furthermore, they examine the potential risks of his strategy, noting that while his base remains loyal, these financial controversies could alienate wavering voters. Ultimately, the episode dissects the nature of Farage’s political tactics, framing the upcoming by-election as a classic "Nigel versus the establishment" stunt aimed at maintaining media dominance and defying his critics while the investigation into his financial transparency continues.
Why is Sky buying the home of Coronation Street?
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts explore the significant implications of the proposed 1.6 billion pound takeover of ITV by Sky. The discussion centers on why two of Britain's most iconic broadcasting entities believe consolidation is necessary to survive in an increasingly competitive global media landscape. By combining Sky's technological reach with ITV's extensive catalog of free-to-air content, the companies aim to create a domestic streaming giant capable of standing up against massive international competitors like Netflix, Amazon, and YouTube. The episode clarifies that Sky is acquiring ITV's broadcast division and the ITVX streaming platform, rather than the entire company. Notably, the deal includes complex arrangements regarding production studios and intellectual property, such as the exchange of Love Productions. The hosts analyze the regulatory hurdles ahead, particularly concerning media plurality and the influence of American ownership through Sky’s parent company, Comcast. Ultimately, the conversation highlights how shifting viewer habits, the decline of linear television, and the dominance of tech giants in advertising are forcing traditional broadcasters to adapt rapidly to ensure their long-term viability in a transformed digital age.
Why Burnham could be getting the Milibands back together
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts delve into the intriguing possibility of a political reunion between the Miliband brothers, David and Ed, within a potential cabinet led by Andy Burnham. The discussion highlights the personal and professional tensions that have defined their relationship since the 2010 Labour leadership contest, where Ed famously defeated his elder brother. The episode explores how politics is pushing these figures back onto the stage, noting that Ed Miliband has already sounded out David regarding a return to frontline politics. While David has spent years building international prestige as president of the International Rescue Committee, the conversation weighs the risks and benefits of his potential appointment as Foreign Secretary. The hosts also examine Ed Miliband’s own path toward a possible role as Chancellor of the Exchequer, despite the political baggage from his past leadership and his reputation for being polarizing. Ultimately, the discussion frames this potential alignment as a high-stakes, soap-opera-like development that could define the future of the Labour Party, questioning whether Andy Burnham can successfully manage two powerful, ambitious brothers without inviting political instability.
Why Trump’s Iran war is finally costing UK households
In this episode of This Is Why, host Mari Aurora sits down with business and economics reporter James Sillers to analyze why UK households are facing a thirteen percent increase in energy bills despite the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East beginning months earlier. The discussion centers on the role of the Ofgem energy price cap, which functions as a necessary safety net for households on default tariffs, and why this recent hike is only now reaching consumers. Sillers explains that the disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and the broader impact of the conflict on global gas prices have finally permeated the UK market. While the immediate rise amounts to roughly eighteen pounds per month, the experts express caution regarding the upcoming winter season, noting that energy market volatility remains high. The conversation also explores the growing concern over national energy debt, which is projected to reach seven billion pounds by the end of the year. Finally, the pair discusses potential government solutions, including the possibility of a targeted social tariff to support vulnerable families struggling with the ongoing cost-of-living crisis.
Why Burnham’s housebuilding boom is doomed
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts examine Andy Burnham’s ambitious proposals for a massive social housing building program and analyze whether such a plan can realistically address the UK's long-standing housing crisis. Joined by David Byers, Deputy Property Editor at The Times and The Sunday Times, the discussion explores the current state of the construction sector, including the impact of soaring building costs, labor shortages following Brexit, and the complex planning regulations that have consistently stifled development. The conversation highlights the disparity between bold government pledges and the reality of delivery, noting that previous targets have been missed by significant margins. They also debate the feasibility of replacing council tax and stamp duty with a proportional property tax, a move that could stimulate the market but faces enormous political and logistical hurdles. Ultimately, the episode serves as a critical assessment of the structural issues facing the British housing market. The hosts suggest that while Burnham’s vision for social rent homes is socially appealing, the underlying economic realities—including inflation, supply chain disruptions, and the precarious state of building firms—make these goals exceptionally difficult to achieve.
Why British waters are less safe under defence drone plans
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts explore the contentious state of British defense policy and the government’s controversial shift toward a hybrid military model. As the Ministry of Defence prepares to replace aging, large-scale warships with a fleet of smaller, budget-friendly vessels and autonomous drone technology, critics argue that the move prioritizes fiscal constraints over actual national security. The discussion highlights the resignation of the Defence Secretary, who expressed deep concern that the investment plan fails to reflect the lessons learned from modern conflicts, such as those in Ukraine. Expert analysis suggests that while drones and uncrewed systems are essential, relying on them as a cost-cutting measure while abandoning proven, high-capability defense systems leaves the UK dangerously vulnerable. The episode also critiques the UK’s current standing within NATO, noting that the nation is lagging significantly in rearmament efforts compared to its allies. Ultimately, the conversation paints a picture of a government struggling with a massive funding gap and mounting international pressure, questioning whether current leadership truly understands the requirements for national resilience in an increasingly volatile global landscape.
Why the King's tax return leaves unanswered questions
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts delve into the implications of King Charles’s recent decision to publish his tax returns. While Buckingham Palace presents this move as a significant step toward royal transparency, the hosts and their guests—royal correspondent Laura Bundock and forensic accountant Professor Atul Shah—argue that the gesture falls short of genuine openness. The discussion highlights that while the monarch voluntarily paid 12.9 million pounds in taxes, the public lacks the necessary context to assess this figure meaningfully. The panel explores the complexity of royal finances, including the Sovereign Grant and the vast, private wealth held within the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall. A central tension emerges regarding the lack of clarity surrounding the King's total private income, his full asset portfolio, and the significant deductions claimed for official duties. Beyond the numbers, the episode examines broader concerns regarding governance, the modernization of the monarchy, and the sustainability of the current financial model. The hosts question whether the lack of transparency weakens the institution, especially as public support wavers among younger generations and skepticism grows over the high costs associated with maintaining royal estates.
Why we're in the dark on defence under Andy Burnham
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts explore the uncertainties surrounding Andy Burnham’s potential approach to national defense as his influence in British politics continues to grow. Joined by Sky News political correspondent Rob Powell and military analyst Sean Bell, the discussion dissects Burnham’s lack of a clear track record in foreign affairs and defense, contrasting his background in domestic social policy with the urgent demands of a volatile global security landscape. The panel examines the current challenges facing the UK military, highlighting the gap between existing defense spending and the financial commitments required by NATO. Key topics include whether Burnham would prioritize national security amidst pressing domestic concerns and the possibility of creative funding solutions, such as war bonds, to bridge the gap. The conversation also touches on the importance of political storytelling in building public consensus for increased defense investment. Ultimately, the episode argues that while Burnham is a skilled communicator, significant questions remain regarding whether he fully grasps the gravity of the threats facing the country or how he would navigate the complexities of defense in an era of renewed global conflict.
Why is the UK feeling the heat more than ever?
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts delve into the increasingly intense heat waves affecting the United Kingdom, exploring why these events are becoming more frequent and severe. By examining the science behind heat domes and the role of humidity, the discussion highlights how higher temperatures, coupled with increased moisture, create dangerous conditions for the human body, particularly for the vulnerable. The episode underscores the reality that the UK’s infrastructure—designed for a cooler climate—is currently struggling to cope with rising temperatures that are significantly exacerbated by long-term climate change. Beyond the immediate weather impacts, the hosts engage in a broader analysis of the political and economic challenges surrounding climate adaptation. They debate the urgency of updating national infrastructure, such as water systems and power grids, against the complex backdrop of the net zero transition. The conversation addresses the skepticism surrounding the economic costs of environmental policies while emphasizing that failing to prepare for a changing climate carries its own substantial risks. Ultimately, the episode serves as a thoughtful examination of the friction between immediate political pressures and the long-term necessity of building a resilient, climate-proof society.
Why Brexit will define Burnham’s relationship with Europe
In this episode of This Is Why, the hosts explore the complex political landscape facing Andy Burnham as he navigates the UK’s post-Brexit relationship with Europe. A decade after the 2016 referendum, the conversation examines how Brexit continues to act as a drag on the British economy and a source of political instability in Westminster. The discussion highlights the persistent challenge for any British leader, particularly Burnham: reconciling the need for a pragmatic, closer economic relationship with the European Union while respecting the sensitivities of a divided electorate. Although Burnham has historically been viewed as a pro-European, his current political position—representing a constituency that voted heavily to leave—requires him to tread carefully. The episode delves into the state of current UK-EU relations, describing them as a cautious standoff characterized by superficial warmth rather than deep integration. The guest analyzes whether Burnham could effectively challenge figures like Nigel Farage, while questioning if he possesses a clear strategy for re-engagement. Ultimately, the episode suggests that while Burnham may favor closer ties, the structural and political hurdles of the last ten years remain a significant test for any potential future Prime Minister.
Related Podcasts
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.