You Are Not So Smart
You Are Not So Smart
339 - Enlightened Disagreement
In this episode of You Are Not So Smart, host David McCraney explores the vital mission of the Litwitz Center for Enlightened Disagreement at Northwestern University. The episode highlights the Center’s efforts to combat polarization by teaching advanced dialogue, active listening, and deliberation skills to students. McCraney describes his role as a writer-in-residence during a pilot program where students engaged in specialized modules, including improvisation exercises rooted in Second City techniques and formal argumentation frameworks like the game Point Taken. The discussion emphasizes shifting the focus from winning debates to fostering curiosity and intentional communication. Students share how these tools enabled them to navigate difficult conversations, practice perspective-taking with university administrators, and uncover the deeper values underlying their disagreements. McCraney also introduces his technique of telescoping—a method combining motivational interviewing with structured follow-up questions designed to bypass motivated reasoning and encourage introspection. By highlighting these collaborative academic initiatives, the episode provides a practical look at how we can preserve meaningful discourse in a polarized world, moving away from toxic arguments toward a more empathetic and analytical approach to human interaction.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
About This Episode
Northwestern University just launched the Litowitz Center for Enlightened Disagreement, a real-world institution devoted to "research-backed approaches to cultivating open-mindedness, identifying one’s own cognitive biases, working collaboratively with others despite disagreement and more."
In this episode, David McRaney details his time as a resident of the Center, teaching students how to ask questions that activate a person's introspection, and then follow up with questions that evoke a person's motivated reasoning, then keep going until the other side articulates things they may have never considered before, and, in so doing, reveal the deeper motivations and values generating disagreement.
You'll learn about this and all the other modules of the Center's pilot program. You'll also learn about a new game they are designing to improve scientific literacy of news consumers and news creators.
The Litowitz Center for Enlightened Disagreement
The Center for Public Deliberation
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Listen to You Are Not So Smart in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
More Episodes
343 - Misguided - Matthew Facciani
In episode 343 of You Are Not So Smart, host David McRaney speaks with sociologist and interdisciplinary social scientist Matthew Facciani about his book, Misguided. The conversation centers on why people adopt and spread misinformation, challenging the common assumption that those who believe false information are simply stupid or irrational. Facciani explains that human beings are profoundly social creatures, often motivated by a need to belong to groups, maintain community, and protect their identities. When misinformation aligns with these social goals, it becomes psychologically rational for individuals to embrace it. The episode explores how nefarious actors intentionally exploit these psychological vulnerabilities and social biases to manipulate public opinion and behavior. A key topic is the role of trust, noting that people prioritize the warmth and relatability of influencers over the abstract, often perceived-as-patronizing, nature of traditional institutions. They discuss how the digital age and algorithmic design have hyper-accelerated these ancient human biases, making polarization faster and more scalable than ever. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that no one is immune to these influences, advocating for intellectual humility and a better understanding of the psychological forces that shape our beliefs.
342 - The Conspiracy Theorist Who Changed His Mind
In this episode of You Are Not So Smart, host David McRaney joins Tim Harford on the podcast Cautionary Tales to explore the compelling story of Charlie Veach, a prominent conspiracy theorist who famously changed his mind. Veach, a leader in the 9/11 truth movement, found himself deeply embedded in a community that provided him with the social validation and sense of purpose he felt he lacked in his daily life. The conversation delves into the psychological underpinnings of why individuals join conspiratorial groups, emphasizing that these communities are often driven more by emotional needs and identity than by the specifics of the theories themselves. The discussion highlights the pivotal moment when Veach, while filming a documentary, was confronted with overwhelming evidence—including personal encounters with those who lost loved ones—that ultimately caused him to renounce his beliefs. The hosts discuss the harrowing backlash Veach faced from his former peers, who targeted him with harassment and threats after he publicly recanted. The episode serves as a meditation on the power of social identity, the difficulty of changing one's mind, and the importance of intellectual humility in an age of rampant misinformation.
341 - Positive Rants - Heather Barnes
In episode 341 of You Are Not So Smart, host David McRaney interviews Heather Barnes, a Northwestern University professor and expert in leadership development and communication. With a background in corporate IT consulting and years as a performer and instructor at the legendary Second City, Barnes specializes in translating improvisation techniques into professional tools for business and organizational settings. The conversation centers on the art of communication and the importance of fostering connection in professional environments. Barnes introduces the concept of "positive rants," an exercise designed to help individuals reframe complaints through the lens of their core values. By requiring one person to express a pet peeve while the other paraphrases the grievance using exclusively positive language, the exercise shifts the focus from negative venting to understanding the underlying beliefs of others. This approach helps reduce conflict and encourages empathetic listening, moving beyond the common tendency to prepare a rebuttal while someone else is speaking. Additionally, the episode touches on effective presentation strategies, emphasizing the dangers of "the curse of knowledge" and the need to prioritize audience engagement over information overload.
340 - Thinking Sideways - Jennifer Shahade
In this episode of the podcast, host David McRaney sits down with Jennifer Shahade, a two-time U.S. women’s chess champion and professional poker player, to discuss her new book, Thinking Sideways. The conversation challenges the pervasive myth that genius-level thinkers in complex fields like chess or poker possess the superhuman ability to calculate thousands of potential futures. Shahade explains that, in reality, even the greatest masters do not think dozens of moves ahead. Instead, they rely on "thinking sideways"—a strategy of identifying a small, manageable number of high-quality options in the present moment and evaluating them based on experience and intuition. The pair explores how this approach applies to life, arguing that obsessing over long-term outcomes often leads to "tunneling," where individuals become fixated on a singular, rigid path while ignoring the inevitable chaos of reality. By balancing analytical rigor with the flexibility to adapt when plans go awry, people can make better decisions. The episode also touches on the concept of the "intermezzo," the importance of avoiding the trap of over-planning, and how shifting one’s perspective can help unlock creative solutions to complex problems.
338 - May Contain Lies - Alex Edmans (rebroadcast)
In this episode of You Are Not So Smart, host David McRaney interviews economist Alex Edmans, author of the book May Contain Lies, to explore how human cognition is governed by constant inference. The discussion centers on the brain’s tendency to use heuristics and biases to simplify a complex world, a process Edmans describes as the architecture of assumption. The conversation highlights key psychological concepts like the makes sense stopping rule, where the brain ceases to seek information once it reaches a plausible conclusion, regardless of its accuracy. Edmans explains how confirmation bias and motivated reasoning—often more prevalent in highly intelligent individuals—lead people to accept information that aligns with their existing worldviews. To counter these pitfalls, Edmans introduces the ladder of misinference, a framework designed to help individuals critically evaluate information. This ladder guides listeners through the distinct steps from statement to fact, data, evidence, and finally proof. By learning to distinguish between these categories, listeners can avoid the common traps of black-and-white thinking and develop a more nuanced, granular approach to the information they encounter in daily life.
337 - Cognitive Surrender - Gideon Nave and Steven D. Shaw
In episode 337 of the You Are Not So Smart podcast, host David McRaney sits down with researchers Dr. Gideon Nave and Dr. Steven D. Shaw to explore a growing phenomenon they term cognitive surrender. The discussion centers on the psychological impact of integrating artificial intelligence into human decision-making and reasoning. The episode distinguishes between cognitive offloading—using tools like calculators or GPS to reduce mental demand—and cognitive surrender, where individuals abandon critical thinking entirely to follow AI outputs blindly. Drawing on their recent study, Thinking Fast, Slow, and Artificial, the guests explain that when people use large language models for complex tasks, they often fall into a trap where they fail to verify AI outputs and, crucially, begin to treat the machine’s conclusions as their own thoughts. The guests discuss how humans are susceptible to agentic pareidolia, an innate tendency to project agency and trust onto non-human systems that mimic human-like interaction. Their research demonstrates that even when AI provides incorrect information, users frequently adopt it, often performing worse than if they had relied solely on their own cognition. The episode highlights the urgent need for updated critical thinking strategies in an AI-driven world.
Related Podcasts
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.