The Daily
The New York Times
The Landmark Housing Bill That Trump Refuses to Sign
In this episode of The Daily, host Michael Barbaro sits down with journalist Michael Gold to unpack the sudden collapse of a landmark housing bill that had been poised to become a major bipartisan achievement. Congress had successfully negotiated a comprehensive package designed to combat the national housing crisis by streamlining environmental reviews, incentivizing new construction, and reforming regulations for manufactured housing. Despite passing both the House and Senate with overwhelming, veto-proof margins, President Trump abruptly canceled the scheduled signing ceremony and refused to support the measure. The discussion highlights the growing rift between the President and members of his own party, exacerbated by recent congressional votes on military powers. Gold explains that Trump is leveraging the housing bill to demand the passage of his preferred election legislation, which includes strict voter ID requirements that many Republicans oppose. The episode explores the political dysfunction at play, illustrating how the President's priorities have diverged from those of Republican lawmakers who were eager to campaign on economic affordability ahead of the midterm elections. Ultimately, the segment captures a rare moment of legislative unity derailed by internal partisan friction.
Updated Jul 6, 2026
About This Episode
President Trump called a major bill to address the housing crisis “the most comprehensive and consequential housing legislation in the history of our country,” and a Congress controlled by his own party passed it by overwhelming margins.
So why is he refusing to sign it?
Michael Gold, who covers Congress for The New York Times, discusses Mr. Trump’s abrupt reversal and what may lie ahead.
Guest: Michael Gold, a congressional correspondent for The New York Times in Washington.
Background reading:
- Mr. Trump’s refusal to sign the housing bill complicates a bipartisan effort.
- These are the three potential fates for the bill.
Photo: Philip Cheung for The New York Times
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Listen to The Daily in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
More Episodes
The Onion’s Latest Joke: Taking Over Infowars
In this episode, host Rachel Abrams explores the remarkable acquisition of Alex Jones’s InfoWars by the satirical news outlet The Onion. The takeover follows years of legal battles that culminated in Jones being ordered to pay over a billion dollars in damages to the families of Sandy Hook shooting victims. Abrams sits down with The Onion’s CEO, Ben Collins, and comedian Tim Heidecker to discuss the motivation behind the move and their vision for the platform. The guests explain that their primary goal is to transform the once-notorious conspiracy site into a parody of itself, effectively neutering a media hub that had long poisoned public discourse. They emphasize that the venture is intended to provide financial support to the families affected by the Sandy Hook tragedy while offering audiences a cathartic, humorous alternative to the fear-based misinformation that defined the original InfoWars. Collins and Heidecker reflect on the challenges of operating in a chaotic political climate and their commitment to using satire to expose the absurdity of modern information consumption. The discussion highlights a unique effort to reclaim a digital space for independent, critical, and creative expression.
The Most American Episode of The Daily, Ever.
In this special celebratory episode, the hosts and various contributors from The New York Times newsroom explore what it means to be American by identifying the most quintessentially American elements within their respective beats. From arts and culture to sports and technology, the panel offers a diverse, often surprising, and deeply personal collection of answers that reflect the complexities of the United States. Key discussions include Aaron Copland’s evocative music, the cutthroat competition of the reality show Survivor, and the cultural commentary found in films like Get Out and There Will Be Blood. Contributors also analyze the role of iconic American inventions—such as the M&M and Amazon Prime—and delve into the symbolism of the Statue of Liberty and Walt Whitman’s poetry. Through these varied lenses, the episode examines the tension between American optimism and cynicism, the promise of meritocracy versus exclusive power structures, and the persistent drive toward innovation. Ultimately, the discussion captures the spirit of a nation defined not by a perfect history, but by a shared, ongoing experience and a hopeful, collective future.
250 Years Later, Why We’re Still Fighting About Our Founding
In this episode of The Daily, host Michael Barbaro sits down with reporter Jia Lynn Yang to explore the evolving role of the American founding myth as the nation approaches its 250th anniversary. The discussion highlights a growing political divide: while conservative figures and movements often aggressively claim the founding narrative to promote a sense of national greatness, many on the left have shifted toward a focus on "myth-busting," emphasizing historical flaws like slavery and dispossession. Yang argues that this dynamic has created a problematic vacuum. By focusing exclusively on factual critiques, one side risks ceding the entire concept of national identity and meaning to the other. Drawing on the legacy of figures like Frederick Douglass, Yang suggests that the founding documents should not be seen merely as static historical records or absolute myths, but as living frameworks for ongoing debate. The episode posits that the heart of democracy lies in the shared, albeit contentious, process of interpreting these founding ideals. Ultimately, the conversation advocates for returning to a tradition where citizens across the political spectrum engage with these foundational texts to collectively define the nation's future.
The Fallout of Massive Earthquakes for Venezuela — and the U.S.
This episode of The Daily explores the devastating aftermath of two massive earthquakes that struck Venezuela, leaving a trail of destruction in the coastal state of La Guaira and beyond. The podcast details the chaos that unfolded, as power outages and collapsed telecommunications left citizens isolated and unable to locate loved ones. Correspondents describe a scene of widespread ruin, where hastily constructed social housing projects—built under the administrations of Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro—failed, leading to significant loss of life and raising urgent questions about government negligence. The discussion highlights the inspiring, grassroots resilience of Venezuelan citizens who organized their own rescue efforts in the absence of a coordinated state response. Furthermore, the episode examines the complex geopolitical fallout of the tragedy, focusing on the deepened alliance between the current Venezuelan leadership and the United States government. As the Trump administration increases its involvement in reconstruction, the episode analyzes how this crisis has complicated the opposition’s path to power and fundamentally challenged the narrative surrounding international intervention in the region. Ultimately, the hosts consider how this humanitarian disaster has reshaped the political landscape and the uncertain future of Venezuela.
Why Americans Will Get Less Help Paying for College
In this episode of The Daily, host Rachel Abrams speaks with personal finance writer Ron Lieber about significant changes to the federal student loan program that aim to reshape higher education in America. As college costs have soared, the government is introducing stricter policies designed to act as guardrails for families and students who may be overextending themselves financially. The new measures include caps on the amount parents can borrow for undergraduate studies and limits on loans for graduate programs. Furthermore, the government is implementing an earnings test for specific degree programs; if alumni fail to meet a minimum income threshold compared to their high-school-educated peers, those programs could lose access to federal funding. Lieber explains that while some see these policies as a necessary correction to a system that has encouraged excessive debt, others worry about the impact on students and academic institutions. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the need for greater transparency and data in the college admissions process, encouraging prospective students to ask more informed questions about the true value and return on investment of the degrees they pursue.
The Supreme Court Expands Presidential Power. Again.
In this episode, the host discusses two significant and seemingly contradictory Supreme Court rulings that reshape the landscape of presidential power and federal governance. The primary decision marks a major shift by overturning decades of precedent, allowing the president to fire the heads of independent regulatory agencies at will. By embracing the theory of a unitary executive, the Court’s conservative majority has effectively removed the protections Congress previously established to insulate these agencies from political pressure, fundamentally altering how federal departments operate. In a striking contrast, the Court issued a second ruling that carves out a specific exception for the Federal Reserve. The justices determined that the central bank’s independence is uniquely critical to the global economy, thereby maintaining "for-cause" protections for its governors. The discussion explores the implications of this shift, highlighting how the Court is not only expanding executive authority but also systematically weakening Congressional oversight and consolidating its own judicial power. Ultimately, the guests reflect on how these institutional changes will have lasting consequences, potentially creating a "pendulum effect" where future presidents of any political party can exercise unprecedented control over the federal government.
Why Everyone Cares About This World Cup
In this episode of The Daily, the discussion centers on the profound cultural and geopolitical impact of the latest World Cup held in the United States. While the tournament has broken records for attendance and goal-scoring, the show explores how it has transformed into a unique human experiment, bringing together diverse global populations despite significant international tensions. Listeners hear about the unexpected connections formed as international fans travel across America, engaging with local communities in places ranging from rural Kansas to Boston. The episode highlights how these interactions often defy geopolitical divisions, showcasing a softer side of international diplomacy where shared passions for the sport bridge deep-seated differences. The episode also features an intimate look at the experiences of Iranian-American fans. Through the story of a father and son, the program examines the complex struggle of maintaining national pride and family heritage amidst an ongoing war and internal community divisions regarding their country’s government. Ultimately, the episode illustrates the World Cup as a complex, "spicier" stage where personal identity, diaspora politics, and the universal language of soccer collide, demonstrating how a sporting event can simultaneously reflect global conflict and foster unexpected unity.
The Last 12 Weeks
In this episode of The Daily, host Rachel Abrams introduces a gripping new collaboration between Serial Productions and The Marshall Project titled The Last 12 Weeks. The series offers an unprecedented, fly-on-the-wall look at a high-stakes legal battle to stop the execution of David Wood, a man convicted of being a notorious serial killer in El Paso, Texas, during the late 1980s. The narrative centers on Greg Warchuck, a veteran death penalty defense attorney who is convinced of Wood’s innocence. With only months remaining before the scheduled execution, the podcast follows Warchuck and his team as they race against time to challenge decades-old evidence. Key to their strategy is uncovering potential corruption from the original trial, including the testimony of jailhouse informants who may have been coerced. Warchuck faces immense resistance from the legal system, local authorities, and public opinion, all while fighting for the DNA retesting that he believes could prove his client’s innocence. This episode captures the intense pressure of capital defense work, illustrating the moral complexities and procedural hurdles that define one of the most contentious areas of the American justice system.
Robby Hoffman Will Always Feel Poor, No Matter How Rich She Gets
In this episode, comedian Robby Hoffman joins host Lulu Garcia-Navarro for a candid conversation about the intersections of poverty, fame, and her unique path into the world of professional comedy. Raised as the seventh of ten children in a strict Hasidic community in Crown Heights, Hoffman reflects on a childhood marked by trauma and financial instability. She explains how these formative years continue to shape her worldview, noting that despite her current success in Hollywood, she remains emotionally tethered to a mindset of scarcity that makes it difficult to feel truly secure. The discussion delves into Hoffman’s transition from a religious upbringing to her eventual move to Canada and her path toward coming out at seventeen. She speaks openly about her use of comedy as a survival mechanism, highlighting that her material is born from a life where nothing was considered off-limits. Hoffman discusses her views on creative freedom, the complexities of wealth, and the strange, uncomfortable nature of navigating celebrity culture. Throughout the interview, Hoffman remains unflinchingly honest, revealing the deep-seated motivations behind her craft and the enduring influence of her meager beginnings.
Supreme Court Delivers Big Wins for Trump’s Immigration Agenda
In this episode, the hosts analyze two major Supreme Court rulings that provide significant legal victories for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. The discussion centers on the administration's efforts to systematically reshape immigration enforcement through more meticulous, behind-the-scenes tactics rather than the high-profile operations seen previously. The episode focuses on two specific legal outcomes. The first concerns Temporary Protected Status (TPS), a program that has historically shielded immigrants from deportation when their home countries face war or natural disasters. The court ruled that the executive branch has the authority to unwind these protections without judicial interference, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of individuals vulnerable to deportation. The second ruling addresses asylum claims at the border, with the court effectively narrowing the window for individuals to seek protection while still in transit zones like Mexico. The discussion highlights the administration’s strategy of utilizing existing laws to remove legal pathways for migrants. While logistical challenges remain regarding mass deportations, the episode emphasizes that these rulings provide the administration with the authority and confidence to pursue more permanent, quiet, and broad-reaching changes to the American immigration system.
Related Podcasts
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.