The Ezra Klein Show
New York Times Opinion
A Radical Vision for Israelis and Palestinians
In this episode of The Ezra Klein Show, host Ezra Klein explores a provocative alternative to the traditional Israeli-Palestinian peace frameworks. He sits down with Rula Hardal and Merav Pundak, the co-directors of the Land for All initiative, to discuss their vision of a confederation model. This approach moves beyond the binary choice of a two-state solution based on segregation or a one-state model of total unification. Instead, the guests propose two sovereign, independent states—Israel and Palestine—that maintain political separation while sharing open borders and joint institutions. The discussion highlights how this model acknowledges the deep psychological and historical connections both peoples feel toward the entire land, while simultaneously addressing the intertwined physical reality on the ground. The guests argue that the old paradigm of security through physical walls has failed to provide safety or hope, instead perpetuating cycles of domination and violence. They share their perspectives on the importance of human rights, the necessity of re-imagining a future for their children, and why a pragmatic, shared vision is vital to breaking the current impasse. Klein engages them on the significant hurdles, including security concerns, the role of religious factions, and the intense trauma of the ongoing conflict.
Updated Jul 7, 2026
About This Episode
The old solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict don’t seem to fit the present reality.
A two-state solution feels increasingly impossible, given the scale of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the Palestinian determination for a right of return. And a one-state solution, in which Israelis and Palestinians would live as equal citizens in a single state, is hard to imagine, given how strongly both peoples seek political self-determination.
But what if those aren’t the only options?
A Land for All is an Israeli-Palestinian initiative that is proposing a confederation model: two sovereign states, structured to allow freedom of movement between them. It’s a theory of peace based on neither separation nor unification. It holds, first, that both peoples have a relationship to and claim on all the land and, second, that both peoples want to control their own political destinies.
I have been — and am — skeptical of solutions to a conflict that is so devoid of the political conditions for a settlement. But even if you’re far from your destination, it’s worth knowing where it is you hope to go. So could this be an answer for both peoples? How would it handle the problems that have bedeviled previous solutions, from security and violence to religious extremism?
Rula Hardal and May Pundak are the executive directors of A Land for All. Hardal is a Palestinian citizen of Israel who received her doctorate in political science from the University of Hannover in Germany, and Pundak is an Israeli lawyer, activist and social entrepreneur. They joined me to explain how A Land for All would work and why they think it might succeed where so much else has failed.
Mentioned:
Rula Hardal’s Book Recommendations:
The Holocaust and the Nakba, edited by Bashir Bashir and Amos Goldberg
States of Denial by Stanley Cohen
Israel: What Went Wrong? by Omer Bartov
May Pundak’s Book Recommendations:
Tomorrow Is Yesterday by Hussein Agha and Robert Malley
A Psalm for the Wild-Built by Becky Chambers
The Moomin series by Tove Jansson
Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.
You can find the transcript and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.html
This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Jack McCordick. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris and Kelsey Lannin. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Johnny Simon. Our recording engineer is Johnny Simon. Cinematography by Marina King and Eric Laplante. Our executive producer is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Marie Cascione, Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu, Kristin Lin and Emma Kehlbeck. Original music by Pat McCusker. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta. The director of New York Times Opinion Shows is Annie-Rose Strasser. Transcript editing by Filipa Pajevic and Marlaine Glicksman.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Listen to The Ezra Klein Show in Podtastic
For listeners, not advertisers
More Episodes
The America That’s Still Possible
In this episode, host Ezra Klein sits down with Brian Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, to discuss the complex and often painful history of the United States. As the nation approaches its 250th anniversary, the two explore the necessity of a holistic national narrative that embraces both triumphs and tragedies. They examine the difficulty of reconciling American ideals of freedom and equality with the stark realities of slavery, lynching, and systemic racial violence. Stevenson argues that a nation, like a person, cannot be truly healthy if it ignores its past traumas. He draws parallels between the importance of Holocaust remembrance and the need for Americans to confront their own history of racial injustice to ensure that past atrocities are never repeated. Throughout the discussion, Stevenson emphasizes that acknowledging the "ugliness" of the past is not meant to diminish the country’s achievements, but rather to foster the courage and wisdom needed for genuine progress. By moving toward a more honest and integrated understanding of history, he believes the United States can finally begin to dismantle the lingering narratives of racial hierarchy and move closer to the democracy it has long promised to be.
Chris Rufo Thinks the Right Can Control This. I Don’t.
In this episode of The Ezra Klein Show, host Ezra Klein sits down with conservative activist and strategist Chris Rufo to analyze the current state of the American right and his own influential role within it. Known for his successful efforts to challenge DEI initiatives and critique critical race theory, Rufo discusses his philosophy of activism, which he defines as a form of counter-revolution aimed at restoring traditional American values. The conversation explores Rufo’s provocative views on institutions, arguing that they can never be truly neutral, only impartial. They delve into his advocacy for agitprop—a method of channeling true narratives toward political victory—and his belief that conservatives must move beyond abstract argumentation to engage with the emotional and rhetorical power of modern media. A significant portion of the discussion centers on Rufo’s growing discomfort with the conspiratorial and anti-institutional tendencies of the online right. While Rufo remains committed to his conservative goals, he expresses concern that certain segments of the movement are drifting into nihilism and madness. The episode provides a fascinating look at the internal fractures within modern conservatism, the challenges of building enduring institutions, and the struggle to balance effective political messaging with intellectual rigor and truth.
I Keep Telling People We’re Living in This Dystopian Novel
In this episode of The Ezra Klein Show, host Ezra Klein sits down with author Gary Shteyngart to explore why modern life increasingly feels like a descent into the dystopian world of his 2010 novel, Super Sad True Love Story. The conversation centers on how the book’s satirical predictions—such as hyper-visual social media, constant personal ranking, and a shallow obsession with longevity and wellness—have manifested in today’s reality. Shteyngart and Klein examine the corrosive impact of the modern digital landscape, which prioritizes immediate sensory feedback and data-driven metrics over genuine human connection and introspection. They discuss the concept of "verbling"—the difficult, authentic act of verbal communication—and how it is being replaced by performative digital interactions. Furthermore, the two reflect on the "sad girl" novel trend and the broader decline of interiority, as younger generations struggle with anxiety and a loss of meaningful pleasure in an era of constant performance. Ultimately, the discussion serves as a poignant critique of how technology and corporatized metrics have severed our capacity for joy, urging a return to deeper human engagement and the cultivation of true self-awareness.
Graham Platner, Jon Ossoff and the New Rules of Political Attention
In this episode of The Ezra Klein Show, Ezra Klein is joined by journalist and author Chris Hayes to analyze the evolving nature of attention as a primary currency in modern American politics. The discussion centers on the rise of Graham Platner, a political newcomer who successfully challenged Maine’s incumbent governor by defying traditional recruitment models. Klein and Hayes explore how political parties have historically prioritized institutional success and candidates with stable backgrounds. In contrast, they argue that today’s media environment rewards charisma and the ability to command attention, often favoring figures who express authentic disillusionment with the status quo. The hosts examine whether this shift toward high-risk, high-charisma candidates signals a necessary evolution for the Democratic Party, which has often relied on safer, institutionally vetted candidates who may struggle to connect with a weary electorate. The conversation also touches on the concept of political "code-switching" and the potential risks of relying on candidates with unconventional or controversial personal histories. By analyzing both Platner and other rising figures, the pair highlights the tension between institutional "company men" and the new, attentional, and often more volatile style of leadership shaping the future of national politics.
What’s the Left’s Vision for Foreign Policy After Trump?
In this episode, the host explores the growing ideological rupture within the Democratic Party regarding its approach to foreign policy, particularly in the wake of the conflict in Gaza. The discussion examines how the party’s traditional stances are being challenged by a new generation of staffers and legislators who are demanding greater moral and strategic clarity. The conversation features Matt Duss, a prominent foreign policy expert and former adviser to Bernie Sanders, who argues that the Biden administration’s handling of the war in Gaza represents a profound failure that necessitates a serious reckoning. Duss critiques the long-standing "no daylight" approach to the U.S.-Israel relationship, arguing that it has shielded the Israeli government from accountability and empowered extremist policies while neglecting international law. Beyond the immediate crisis, the episode addresses the broader shift in how Democrats define their international role. By contrasting current policies with historical failures—such as the Iraq War and interventions in Yemen—the discussion delves into the necessity of a foreign policy rooted in human rights, solidarity, and the needs of working families, rather than solely focusing on maintaining the existing security state and the military-industrial complex.
The New Right’s Very Old Vision of Men
In this episode, the host explores the rise of masculinism, a growing ideological project within the American New Right that seeks to dismantle modern gender roles in favor of a return to traditional, often historical, structures. The conversation features Helen Lewis, a staff writer at The Atlantic, who analyzes how this movement—which spans from internet provocateurs like Bronze Age Pervert to intellectual and political figures—uses nostalgia for the 1950s or even ancient civilizations to frame modernity as a failed experiment that has thwarted natural masculinity. The discussion highlights key themes of the movement, including the rejection of "feminized" institutions, the focus on hormonal health and diet as political tools, and a shared belief that equality has been detrimental to society. The guest provides a critical perspective, characterizing many of these arguments as a form of "LARPing" or elite intellectual cosplay that fails to account for the harsh realities of the past. Ultimately, the episode probes why this vision has gained significant traction within the current political climate, functioning as a unifying theory that promises to restore order and vitality to a world these thinkers view as increasingly hollow.
Ian Bremmer on the Risks America Poses to the World
In this episode of The Ezra Klein Show, host Ezra Klein sits down with political scientist and author Ian Bremmer to examine the evolving role of the United States in a fractured geopolitical landscape. The conversation begins by questioning the nature of Donald Trump’s influence, with Bremmer framing him less as an original cause and more as a symptom of deep-seated, long-term frustrations within the American electorate. Bremmer and Klein engage in a detailed discussion regarding the "political revolution" Trump represents, drawing a provocative comparison to Franklin D. Roosevelt—not in ideology, but in the desire to fundamentally upend existing checks and balances. The dialogue shifts to the puzzling divergence between positive macroeconomic indicators and the widespread, persistent negative sentiment among the public. They explore why, despite objective economic growth and low crime rates, the national mood remains historically sour. The hosts weigh various theories, including the impact of inflation, the erosion of the social contract, and the toxic influence of algorithmic media, which they argue amplifies grievance and creates a self-sustaining cycle of cynicism that is increasingly disconnected from the country's actual material reality.
Does Trump Want to Lose the Midterms?
In this episode of The Ezra Klein Show, host Ezra Klein explores a provocative hypothesis: that Donald Trump is not actively trying to win the upcoming midterm elections. Instead, Klein argues that Trump is prioritizing the consolidation of his control over the Republican Party above electoral success. Klein points to Trump’s intervention in primary races, his rhetoric regarding January 6th rioters, and his apparent disregard for key economic concerns as evidence that he views the Republican Party—not a congressional majority—as his ultimate power base and shield against future scrutiny. Joining Klein is Republican strategist Liam Donovan, who offers a professional perspective on the current political landscape. Together, they analyze Trump’s record-low approval ratings and the structural challenges facing the GOP. Donovan discusses the "mythology" of Trump’s first term and the tension between his desire for absolute loyalty and the pragmatic needs of winning competitive races. They delve into specific electoral contests, such as the race in Texas, to illustrate how Trump’s influence can act as a double-edged sword for the party. The conversation provides a deep look at the internal power dynamics of the modern Republican Party and the strategies of a leader who seems more focused on dominance than traditional governance.
Yuval Noah Harari on the Mistake Strongmen Keep Making
In this episode of The Ezra Klein Show, historian and author Yuval Noah Harari explores the fundamental tension between the pursuit of power and the necessity of human cooperation. Harari argues that while populist movements often frame history as a brutal struggle governed by force and hierarchy, human progress has historically relied on our unique ability to cooperate at scale through shared stories. He emphasizes that nationalism, when at its best, fosters care for strangers rather than hatred for outsiders, and he critiques contemporary leaders who prioritize division. The conversation delves into the fragility of the liberal international order, which Harari describes as a complex system of self-correcting mechanisms rather than a promise of final redemption. He discusses the decline of this order, suggesting that modern liberalism has struggled to maintain social cohesion because it has lost sight of the concept of fraternity. Throughout the discussion, Harari addresses the role of fiction in society, the importance of empathy, and the historical evolution of Jewish identity, ultimately cautioning against a worldview that abandons intellectual and moral traditions in favor of sheer brute strength.
How to End the Gerrymandering Doom Loop Forever
In this episode, Ezra Klein explores the escalating crisis of gerrymandering in the United States alongside guest Lee Drutman, a political reform expert at New America. The discussion centers on how the decline of traditional norms and recent Supreme Court rulings have transformed redistricting into a high-stakes, perpetual battleground. Both red and blue states are increasingly discarding independent redistricting commissions, opting instead to maximize their partisan advantage, which effectively disenfranchises voters in the minority party and minimizes the number of truly competitive house elections. Drutman explains that this "maximum warfare" approach has turned American house elections into a system where politicians choose their voters rather than the other way around. He characterizes the current landscape as a "doom loop" where partisan sorting and algorithmic map-making have left voters with little voice. As a potential remedy, Drutman advocates for proportional representation, arguing that moving toward multi-member districts where seats are allocated based on vote share could neutralize the incentives for extreme gerrymandering, increase voter turnout, and force parties to broaden their appeal. The conversation provides a thoughtful critique of the current American political infrastructure and considers whether structural systemic change is the only path forward.
Related Podcasts
All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.