VE

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Premiere Networks

Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Jun 25 2026

Jun 25, 20261h 2m
Summary

In this episode of the Clay and Buck show, Buck Sexton holds down the fort while Clay Travis is on vacation. The episode primarily focuses on the host's analysis of recent Supreme Court decisions regarding immigration and a broader discussion on the psychology behind modern far-left ideologies. Sexton discusses two significant Supreme Court rulings, Mullen v. Dow and a case involving the Immigration and Nationality Act. He highlights how the Court’s six-to-three decisions pushed back against attempts to limit the executive branch’s authority over immigration policy, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining borders and the integrity of asylum systems. Furthermore, Sexton delves into the aftermath of recent New York City elections and protests. He offers a critical perspective on the motivations driving radical far-left movements, arguing that these ideologies are often rooted in resentment and emotional fragility rather than genuine policy concerns. The host contrasts this with his vision of a low-crime, high-trust society and explores the rise of performative activism, specifically touching upon the recent controversy surrounding a Brooklyn coffee shop. The episode concludes with reflections on the moral implications of these trends in contemporary political discourse.

Updated Jun 26, 2026

About This Episode

Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton!  If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

 

Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

 

Buck Sexton focuses heavily on Supreme Court decisions, especially a key case involving immigration and executive authority. Buck highlights a 6–3 ruling in Mullen v. Doe, emphasizing that the Court sided with the executive branch and reinforced presidential authority over immigration programs such as Temporary Protected Status (TPS). The discussion frames TPS as a humanitarian policy originally intended for individuals fleeing war or natural disasters, but now often extended far beyond its “temporary” purpose, sometimes lasting decades. 

 

Buck examines the aftermath of the New York City primary, questioning whether the relatively small turnout contests still signal a growing trend of far-left political momentum in urban Democratic districts. He frames the election results as part of a larger ideological shift within the Democratic Party, suggesting that even smaller races may offer insight into future national elections and Republican strategy heading into the midterms.


A central theme throughout the hour is Buck’s contrast between conservative political philosophy—rooted in constitutionalism, optimism, and Trump-era governance—and progressive ideology, which he characterizes as driven by resentment, grievance, and opposition to success. He argues that conservative politics aim to improve America through stability, growth, and public safety, while criticizing progressive policies as being more focused on punishing perceived inequality than delivering effective outcomes.

 

guest Ryan Girdusky, focusing on the rise of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), New York City politics, voter turnout trends, and the broader ideological direction of the Democratic Party under President Donald Trump’s current administration. The hour centers on the aftermath of recent New York primary elections, spotlighting controversial progressive candidates such as Zohran Mamdani and Darializa Chevalier, while examining how socialist-aligned movements are reshaping Democratic coalitions at the local and national levels.


A major theme of Hour 3 is the growing influence of the DSA in New York City politics, described as the “crown jewel” of the organization’s national network. Buck and Girdusky analyze how DSA candidates and aligned figures are leveraging the Democratic Party as a “ballot access vehicle,” pushing a more openly socialist agenda from within while viewing the traditional Democratic establishment as an obstacle. This strategy is portrayed as increasingly effective, particularly in affluent, college-educated, and heavily progressive neighborhoods referred to as the “comedy corridor”—a stretch of waterfront districts from Astoria in Queens down through Brooklyn, which has become a hub of far-left political activism and extremely high voter turnout.

 

Buck speaks with guest Dan Mason, former CBS Radio CEO, who reflects on the evolution of radio, the enduring power of one-to-one audience connection, and the changing media landscape in the digital age. Mason emphasizes radio’s unique ability to build personal relationships with listeners, contrasting it with less intimate platforms like television, and highlights ongoing debates over public broadcasting, including NPR funding and perceived political bias.


The hour concludes with a broader optimistic outlook on America under President Donald Trump, with Buck pushing back against pessimism from a caller and encouraging listeners to embrace patriotism, stability, and historical perspective heading into major national celebrations like Independence Day. He underscores that, despite political tensions and global concerns, the United States is not facing crises on the scale of war, economic collapse, or pandemic lockdowns, and remains in a strong position. 

 

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL

More Episodes

BONUS POD: Rising Socialist Star One Day, Democrats Rush for the Exits the Next

Jul 7, 202610 minSummary

In this episode, the discussion focuses on the rapid shift in Democratic support for Maine U.S. Senate candidate Graham Cartwright following severe allegations of misconduct. The program analyzes the timeline of events, noting that while Cartwright faced prior scrutiny regarding disturbing past comments and controversial personal history, the party continued to back him as a rising progressive star. It was only when the latest allegations became politically toxic that Democratic leaders and organizations began calling for his resignation. The host argues that this sudden reversal is not motivated by moral clarity or a newfound commitment to standards, but rather by political calculation and liability management. By examining the timing of these withdrawals—coinciding with key election deadlines for candidate replacement—the episode suggests that the party is prioritizing electoral strategy over principle. The commentary highlights a perceived double standard in media and political accountability, asserting that Democrats conveniently abandon candidates only when their scandals become insurmountable burdens to the party's broader goals. Ultimately, the discussion serves as a critique of partisan blindness and the inconsistency of those who claim the moral high ground.

Celebrating America’s Greatness and Answering the Call to Defeat the Communists Taking over the Democrat Party

Jul 6, 202633 minSummary

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson reflect on the nation’s 251st year following Fourth of July celebrations. The hosts share personal anecdotes from the holiday, emphasizing the importance of family and the symbolic beauty of American traditions, including the record-breaking fireworks displays. The conversation shifts to a more serious tone as the hosts address what they describe as a critical juncture for the United States. They analyze recent political speeches, specifically critiquing rhetoric they identify as a shift toward radical leftist and communist ideologies infiltrating the Democratic Party. The hosts argue that this represents a fundamental challenge to the principles of individual liberty and limited government. They discuss specific political candidates they view as embodying this ideological shift, expressing concern over the potential long-term consequences for the country’s direction. Finally, the discussion moves to the sports arena, where they celebrate the reversal of a red card penalty against a U.S. soccer player in the World Cup, framing the victory as a win for the team and a moment of national pride.

Minnesota Fraud Whistleblowers Hunted, the Fight for the Future of College Athletics & Controversial DA Practices in PA Week In Review

Jul 4, 202634 minSummary

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, the host and co-host Ben Ferguson break down three major news stories from the past week. The conversation begins with a report on Minnesota, where government officials allegedly hired private investigators to intimidate whistleblowers who were attempting to expose massive social services fraud. The hosts discuss the implications of this scandal, criticizing the state’s leadership and emphasizing the necessity of federal accountability. The discussion then shifts to the future of college athletics. Senator Cruz details his new bipartisan legislation aimed at protecting the collegiate sports ecosystem. He explains how current legal challenges and a lack of clear rules have pushed college sports toward a chaotic model that threatens to eliminate non-revenue sports and scholarships for hundreds of thousands of students. Finally, the episode examines the practices of progressive district attorneys, with a specific focus on Philadelphia. The hosts argue that outside financial influence in local DA races has shifted the justice system toward policies like bail reform and reduced sentencing, which they contend lead to increased crime and societal instability. Throughout the discussion, the hosts analyze the motivations behind these trends and advocate for a return to traditional law enforcement principles.

Happy Birthday America: Celebrating What is Extraordinary about our Great Nation

Jul 3, 202635 minSummary

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States. Moving away from typical political debates, the hosts dedicate the episode to reflecting on what makes the American experiment unique and why citizens should feel a sense of pride in their country regardless of the current political climate. Senator Cruz highlights the bravery of the Founding Fathers, noting that by signing the Declaration of Independence, they were committing treason against the world’s most powerful empire, risking their lives, fortunes, and honor. The discussion centers on the revolutionary concept that sovereignty rests with the people rather than an elite ruler, and that fundamental rights are endowed by the Creator rather than granted by the government. The hosts emphasize the importance of passing these values down to the next generation, encouraging parents to have meaningful conversations with their children about the blessings of liberty. Ultimately, the episode serves as a patriotic reflection on American resilience, the nation’s founding principles, and the responsibility to preserve the republic for the future.

BONUS POD: Democrats Double Down on Trans Athletes Ahead of Midterms

Jul 2, 202612 minSummary

In this episode, the hosts analyze the political fallout following a recent Supreme Court ruling that allows states to enforce laws prohibiting transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports. The discussion centers on how this issue is poised to become a defining theme in the upcoming midterm elections. While conservatives celebrate the ruling as a victory for fairness and the preservation of biological advantages in competitive athletics, the hosts highlight the starkly different reaction from Democratic leadership. The program examines comments from figures like J.B. Pritzker, who characterizes such state-level bans as a distraction and expresses concern for the mental health of transgender youth. The hosts argue that despite Democratic attempts to frame these policies as exclusionary, the move to restrict transgender athletes in female sports is supported by a significant majority of the American public. By contrasting the legal arguments heard in court—focused on testosterone levels and physiological differences—with the heated rhetoric surrounding the campaign trail, the episode illustrates a deepening divide. The discussion concludes that both parties are utilizing this cultural flashpoint to energize their respective bases as the election season intensifies.

Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Jun 30 2026

Jul 1, 202659 minSummary

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, the host discusses a significant and controversial Supreme Court ruling regarding birthright citizenship. The decision effectively maintains that individuals born on U.S. soil are automatically citizens, regardless of the circumstances of their birth, including cases involving birth tourism. The host expresses strong disapproval of the ruling, arguing that it represents a serious error by the court and devalues the meaning of American citizenship. The discussion highlights the legal implications of the decision, noting that it complicates efforts to address illegal immigration and the use of the immigration system to gain long-term status. Later, the episode features a conversation with Congressman Jim Jordan, who weighs in on the ruling and explores potential legislative responses. Jordan emphasizes the need to tighten immigration laws and eliminate sanctuary jurisdictions, which he describes as a harmful policy that prevents local law enforcement from cooperating with federal authorities. The discussion also touches upon the upcoming election cycle in Ohio and the broader challenges of maintaining national security and legal integrity in the face of current immigration policies.

Understanding the Historic Supreme Court Victories & Losses this Week

Jul 1, 202642 minSummary

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, the host and co-host Ben Ferguson provide a detailed analysis of several landmark rulings issued by the U.S. Supreme Court. The discussion centers on categorizing these decisions as either significant victories for constitutional principles or notable losses. A primary focus is the overturning of the 91-year-old precedent in Humphrey’s Executor. Cruz explains why he believes the court correctly ruled that the president possesses the authority to remove executive branch officials, specifically noting the case involving the Federal Trade Commission. The hosts also touch upon the nuances of presidential power regarding the Federal Reserve, highlighting the court’s reluctance to grant total discretion in that specific area. Furthermore, the podcast celebrates a major win regarding the protection of women's sports. Cruz breaks down the court’s decision to uphold state laws that require athletes to compete based on biological sex, discussing the constitutional and civil rights implications. Finally, the episode covers a decision involving the Federal Election Commission and the First Amendment, where the court struck down strict limits on how political parties coordinate spending with their candidates, which Cruz argues is a vital win for political free speech.

BONUS POD—FREEDOM VS. MANDATES: The Fight Over Faith, Jobs and Vaccines

Jun 30, 202612 minSummary

This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz examines the findings of the Religious Liberty Commission, a body recently tasked with identifying threats to faith-based freedoms and proposing legislative and executive remedies. The discussion centers on the commission’s final report, which offers a roadmap for protecting Americans from government mandates that conflict with their sincerely held religious beliefs. A primary focus of the episode is the impact on the healthcare industry and the U.S. military. The hosts analyze recommendations aimed at shielding medical professionals and service members from being forced to choose between their livelihoods and their conscience, particularly in the aftermath of COVID-19 vaccine mandates. The report advocates for stronger enforcement of federal conscience laws and more meaningful religious accommodation processes. While critics argue these protections could hinder access to certain medical services, proponents view them as essential safeguards for constitutional rights. By establishing a framework for future policy, the commission aims to ensure that federal agencies face a significantly higher legal bar before overriding religious exemptions, fundamentally shaping the landscape of religious liberty in the United States for years to come.

BONUS POD: Billions Stolen, War Paused & a Communist Mayoral Candidate goes for DC

Jun 29, 202625 minSummary

In this bonus episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, the hosts delve into a series of pressing national and international concerns. The discussion begins with a shocking healthcare fraud scheme involving billions of dollars, highlighting the tragic case of an eighteen-year-old student whose death was linked to fraudulent medical testing. The hosts emphasize that this systemic corruption is not merely a financial crime but a human one, stealing both taxpayer money and lives. The conversation then shifts to the recent diplomatic developments in the Middle East, specifically the temporary pause in hostilities between the United States and Iran. The hosts analyze the fragility of this agreement, noting the potential impact on global energy markets and the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz. Finally, the episode addresses domestic politics, focusing on the mayoral race in Washington, D.C. The hosts criticize the platform of the leading progressive candidate, labeling her policies as radical. This segment connects local issues to broader concerns about political influence, referencing significant financial contributions from major donors aimed at shaping the direction of the country's leadership.

Activist DA in Philly Releases Criminals 'wit' LUV, Biden-Judge 'Sparkles' helping Illegals Vote & 2 YUGE Victories in SCOTUS Week In Review

Jun 27, 202628 minSummary

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and host Ben Ferguson provide a critical analysis of recent legal and political developments. The conversation opens with a sharp critique of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office, specifically targeting the policies of Larry Krasner. The hosts argue that Krasner’s administration has prioritized the release of convicted murderers by frequently and questionably conceding error in criminal cases, a practice they describe as a dangerous misuse of prosecutorial power that undermines public safety. The discussion then shifts to a federal court ruling regarding the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program. Senator Cruz expresses concern over a decision by a district court judge that limits the government's ability to cross-reference databases to identify non-citizens on voter rolls, labeling it an act of judicial activism. Finally, the episode highlights two significant Supreme Court victories for former President Trump regarding immigration policy, specifically involving the Remain in Mexico program and the revocation of Temporary Protected Status. Senator Cruz offers his legal perspective on these rulings, emphasizing their importance for maintaining national border security and executive authority in immigration enforcement.

All podcast names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Podcasts listed on Podtastic are publicly available shows distributed via RSS. Podtastic does not endorse nor is endorsed by any podcast or podcast creator listed in this directory.